backtop


Print 21 comment(s) - last by Lerianis.. on Jul 8 at 12:41 AM

Bans are not working in many instances proving you can't fix stupid

Governments at both the state and federal level are working to find some way to reduce distracted driving in the United States. Automakers and mobile phone makers are also joining in the fray to help reduce the number of accidents caused by drivers being distracted while texting, e-mailing, and talking on the phone while driving.
 
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention released a survey last week that shows how problematic distracted driving is. The survey shows that distracted driving is especially pronounced among younger drivers with 58% of high school seniors admitting to having texted or e-mailed while driving the previous month. According to the survey, 43% of high school juniors acknowledged having texted or e-mailed while driving. Those numbers are despite the fact that 39 states ban texting and driving for all age groups and five more states ban texting and driving for teen drivers.
 
The fact of the matter is there is no absolute cure for distracted driving despite technology. Many apps that promise to eliminate the ability to text or make calls while driving have limitations that make them unusable in some circumstances. One circumstance is that these applications can't tell if the user is a passenger or driver in the car. Since the app can't differentiate between a passenger in the driver, they're easy to override if the driver decides to text or make phone calls.
 
A potential solution for this problem are similar products offered by companies called ZoomSafer and CellControl. These companies offer apps that put the driver's phone into driving mode blocking texting and e-mail using a device that plugs into the engine diagnostic port or listens for a while the signal from the cars integrated electronic system. The systems are able to differentiate between a person driving in the car and the person who is riding the bus where they can text while moving. The downside is that the systems are expensive with one company charging $130 for the device that admits the tone the phone listens for to block texting.
 
While parents of young drivers and drivers themselves may be looking apps to help curb distracted driving, the federal government is looking to law enforcement. The Transportation Department awarded $2.4 million to Delaware and California to operate pilot projects combining more police enforcement of bans along with publicity campaigns against distracted driving. Reducing accidents caused by distracted driving is one of the reasons some auto manufacturers and search giant Google are pushing for automated vehicles. An automated vehicle in some instances is able to drive itself, taking the driver out of the equation.
 
"If you are really going to look to the future, you are going to have to ask yourself: Is Google right? Should we have driverless cars?" said Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the Center for Automotive Safety, a consumer group. "The computer driven car with a GPS system is going to make less mistakes than a human being. The question is, is society ready for it?"

Source: The Detroit News



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Another Law that is not tested
By tecknurd on 6/12/2012 5:29:04 PM , Rating: 2
Banning texting and e-mailing while driving is only as good if the person gets caught which means the cop have to look through the windows of each car to catch people in the act. Cars come with tinted windows, so catching people in the act makes it harder for cops to enforce the ban. In this case the banning is completely a stupid law that got pass with out thinking can people be caught in the act of texting or e-mailing. The answer to this is NO!

This law is the same as buckling up. You know that you should buckle up, but not everybody does it. You know that texting or e-mailing should not be done while driving, but people still do it.

To me people that are addicted to these social devices and still drive while using them is another way for nature to eventually kick the asses of these people because they do not have any common sense or just being stupid. Just another law that is not tested.




RE: Another Law that is not tested
By jRaskell on 6/19/2012 1:42:55 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
In this case the banning is completely a stupid law that got pass with out thinking can people be caught in the act of texting or e-mailing.


There is one aspect of enforcing these laws that you aren't taking into consideration.

http://articles.cnn.com/2012-06-06/justice/justice...

Sure there's little consolation there to the family of the victims, but I am absolutely positive that the outcome of that case has opened some drivers eyes to the potential penalties involved, if not the dangers themselves. Without the laws themselves in place, it's far more difficult to convict guilty parties of these reckless actions.


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser

















botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki