Virtually Every Ultrabook Appears to Violate New Apple Patent
June 7, 2012 2:30 PM
comment(s) - last by
The Ultrabook category could potentially be killed off or diminished by Apple lawsuits
: Apple's patent appears invalid due to prior art -- Sony Corp. (
) released a teardrop laptop in 2004, the Sony VAIO X505.]
Apple, Inc. (
) has brought
the smartphone market, with a
slew of lawsuits
which essentially seek to ban all of its top smartphone competitors products. According to Apple, all of its competitors are ripping off its technology.
Now Apple may be preparing to bring that same brand of litigious chaos to the world of personal computer, thanks to its victory in convinced the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
to allow it to patent the design of its
MacBook Air (MBA) case
. Apple was granted U.S. Design Patent
I. Nearly Every Ultrabook is in Violation
Very clever in its working, Apple's new intellectual property jewel is carefully crafted to place nearly every one of its competitors designs in violation, via making its claim very general and wide.
The patent covers claims exclusive ownership to thin teardrop/wedge-shaped notebook computers. At first glance many of its competitors Ultrabooks would appear to be in violation of this patent. In other words, with this patent, Apple appears to be well along the way to having the legal firepower necessary to obtain a ban all competitors lightweight laptops.
Samsung's Series 5 Ultrabook Convertible
ASUSTek Computer Inc.'s (
Acer, Inc.'s (
Aspire S7 Series
[Image Source: Pocket Lint]
Hewlet Packard Comp.'s (
Dell, Inc. (
II. Patenting Fundamental Physics
There's a reason why all of these laptops are teardrop and/or wedge shaped. Given the size of USB ports and the size necessary for the hinge, there's no real other possible design that would allow these laptops to achieve the kind of thiness and light weight that the Ultrabook spec demands.
Now one thought might be that the USPTO merely granted Apple a narrow patent on its MacBook Air design. But Apple's patent makes it explicitly clear that it's claiming a very wide exclusive rights to produce thin, wedge shaped laptops. It says that size, hinge design, etc. are irrelevant. It says that the back can have "any contour or shape" and still infringe.
Apple's patent is very tricking in its claim, designed to place nearly every ultrabook design on the market in infringement. [Image Source: USPTO via The Verge]
In other words, if the USPTO read the patent, they had to have recognized exactly how wide a design ownership they were granting Apple.
III. What's Next?
A couple important things to bear in mind. Apple hasn't sued anybody -- yet. But it now has the ammo to do so, and could potentially gain a monopoly on ultrathin notebooks, if it chooses to pursue lawsuits against all of its computer making rivals. HP has already
pledged to defend its design against potential litigation
Apple could be fearful of the damage to its reputation that requesting a ban on all rival Ultrabook designs might have. But it has shown little such fears in the smartphone market, so image may not be enough to convince Apple to avoid seeking bans.
Likewise, fundamental physics (hinge design) and universal standards (USB port size) seem to dictate no way around Apple's design, hence the patent seems highly questionable. But for better or worse the USPTO has decided that Apple should have it.
No one is questioning that Apple pioneered the Ultrathin category with its MacBook Air. While
launched not long after, it featured a more traditional flat design and hence was more constrained in size, weight, and specs. But the question is whether Apple gets to have a monopoly because it got their first and because the laws of physics (and standards) dictate few alternatives. That may be an issue that is pressed in court, if Apple's swelling legal team and history of looking to litigate rather than compete are any indication.
Update 1 June 7, 2012:
Well if Apple does sue anyone, it will have a tough case to make. Get a load of
Sony's VAIO X505
launched in 2004. Turns out Apple wasn't even the first to pioneer this market -- Sony was the first (to our knowledge) ultrathin maker.
Sony's design clearly is in violation of Apple's patent -- but it came first. That means Apple's appears highly likely to invalid. In a sense, its wideness -- a gambit to ensure everyone infringes, may prove its downfall.
[Image Source: Notebook Review]
[Image Source: Image Shack]
It should be interesting to see how this plays out, if this goes to court.
USPTO via SBNation [PDF]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Too late?
6/7/2012 5:14:34 PM
As of 2011, the US patent system is "first to file", not "first to invent", not "first to market". If a company doesn't file a design patent for a product, a competitor can clone the product and file a design patent. Likely the original product won't be found infringing (though this still depends on the courts and who has the better legal team/larger legal budget/more bought off politicians/judges), but future products from other companies would be.
In order to invalidate a design patent, one would have to show that a company committed IP fraud by filing the design patent with knowledge of the prior art. This is very difficult to do, especially against a large corporation with effectively an infinite legal budget and many politicians/judges in their corner.
As I mentioned in a different post, the new "first to file" system has created enormous incentives for IP fraud and espionage. So we see today a huge number of very broad patent filings and a vast landscape of IP lawsuits. In the future, we will see unprecedented levels of industrial espionage, all due to the rewards that are given to those who are "first to file".
RE: Too late?
6/7/2012 5:36:32 PM
No, you all are all wrong. it is the job of the patent examiners to check for prior art. if they find none they grant it. lately is seems they don't even bother to do their jobs.
RE: Too late?
6/8/2012 9:30:21 AM
can patent bureaus be sewed for granting ridiculous patents ? like for incompetence, negligence etc ?
companies could maybe make a lot of money by sewing those patent bureaus into oblivion or until they get their act together.
a bit like 'the court of xxx has decided that bureau yyy has granted an unlawful patent that let to financial losses for companies a, b, ... , z amounting to a loss of income calculated at xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx us $ which is to be payed by company xxx and bureau yyy to companies a-z'
a ruling like that would prevent companies to try and get a patent on something like 'we have a patent on using a form of energy as a way to power devices' and would force the patent bureau to do it's work properly (search for that prior art etc..) or face law suits that are assured to force the patent bureau into bankruptcy.
"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
Apple Looks to Kill Samsung's Galaxy S III and the Rest of Its Family
June 7, 2012, 2:08 PM
Lenovo, Samsung Join the Windows 8 Touch-PC Feeding Frenzy
June 5, 2012, 5:54 PM
ASUS Shows Off Windows 8 Desktop+Tablet TAICHI, New Transformer Tablets
June 4, 2012, 12:10 PM
Acer Embraces Windows 8 with New Tablets, Ultrabooks, and All-in-Ones
June 3, 2012, 11:29 PM
Game Over? Apple's Bid to Kill HTC Nears Fruition as ITC Blocks Imports
May 16, 2012, 11:35 AM
Air Force Expects to Save Over $50 Million in 10 Years by Using iPads
May 17, 2013, 12:26 PM
Former Intel CEO Regrets Passing Up on iPhone Gravy Train
May 17, 2013, 11:46 AM
Intel-Based Lenovo Yoga 11 Lands, is $240 USD More Expensive Than ARM Version
May 17, 2013, 11:02 AM
Galaxy S IV Looks to Hit 10 Million Sales in Just Four Weeks
May 17, 2013, 10:12 AM
Nintendo Wii U: No EA Games for You!
May 17, 2013, 8:35 AM
Quick Note: CyanogenMod Hits 5 Million Users
May 16, 2013, 1:42 PM
Most Popular Articles
Report: Microsoft Eyes Return to "Dying" Windows 7 Path After Windows 8 Flop
May 13, 2013, 9:50 AM
Windows 8.1 Will Be Free; Microsoft Holds Onto Struggling ARM Variant
May 14, 2013, 2:57 PM
Bill Gates Gets Teary-Eyed While Discussing Steve Jobs, Shows Off Life-Saving Tech on 60 Minutes
May 13, 2013, 12:30 PM
Google Announces "Pure" Galaxy Nexus S4 for $649, Android Updates
May 15, 2013, 1:42 PM
Google's Eric Schmidt: "Don't Be Evil" was Stupid
May 14, 2013, 11:00 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
Elon Musk Willing to Spend More Money on Widening of 405 Freeway
Apr 26, 2013, 7:28 PM
New $100 Bill Due in October
Apr 24, 2013, 11:52 PM
Volkswagen Shows off iBeetle in Shanghai
Apr 22, 2013, 9:29 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information