Print 57 comment(s) - last by 91TTZ.. on Jun 8 at 10:47 AM

After the Phantom Eye landed, it was slightly damaged when the landing gear hit the lakebed and broke

Boeing sent its Phantom Eye unmanned airborne system (UAS) on its first autonomous flight last week.

Boeing's Phantom Eye is a hydrogen-powered unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) that is propeller-driven. The aircraft uses two 2.3 liter, four-cylinder engines capable of pushing 300 horsepower total and can loiter above a target for up to 10 days. Its main purpose is to gather information or conduct attack missions.

The Phantom Eye took off at 6:22 a.m. PST for a 28-minute flight. It reached an altitude of 4,080 feet and a speed of 62 knots. The flight took place June 1 at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base in California.

"This day ushers in a new era of persistent Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaisance (ISR) where an unmanned aircraft will remain on station for days at a time providing critical information and services," said Darryl Davis, president of Boeing Phantom Works. "This flight puts Boeing on a path to accomplish another aerospace first -- the capability of four days of unrefueled, autonomous flight."

After the Phantom Eye landed, it was slightly damaged when the landing gear hit the lakebed and broke. But overall, the flight was a success.

Previous to the June 1 flight, the Phantom Eye took part in a series of tests throughout April, such as navigation and control, pilot interface, and mission planning.

The Phantom Eye used for demonstration purposes has a 150-foot wingspan and can carry a 450-pound payload. It can fly up to 96 hours without needing to land, but Boeing is looking to make a new model in 2014 that can fly up to 240 hours without landing.

Source: Boeing

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Hydrogen?
By 91TTZ on 6/8/2012 10:26:41 AM , Rating: 2
I find the choice of engine configuration more unusual than the choice of fuel. A prop configuration demands high RPM, not torque, which is why inline and V-configuration engines were terrible in world war-era planes.

I think you have that backwards. Prop aircraft don't require high RPM. Piston aviation engines usually turn at a much lower RPM than automotive engines. People that use automotive engine conversions on their homebuilt aircraft often have to use a speed-reducing gearbox so the prop doesn't turn at full crankshaft speed. This increases the weight of the aircraft.

A popular 4 cylinder aircraft engine like the O-320 produces 160 HP at 2700 RPM.

And rotary engines like the Wankel are very inefficient, so fuel efficiency would be horrible. For instance, a Mazda RX-8 gets slightly worse highway fuel economy than a larger, heavier Corvette Z06 with the 7 liter V8.

"DailyTech is the best kept secret on the Internet." -- Larry Barber
Related Articles

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki