Oracle Shifts Gears, Prepares for Bitter "Divorce" Court Battle With HP
June 4, 2012 1:56 PM
comment(s) - last by
Companies are at odds over Itanium, other issues
After being dealt
court crusade against Google
) Android, Oracle Corp. (
) and its CEO Larry Ellison are collecting themselves for their next major court battle. Back in court (
Case "Hewlett-Packard Company v. Oracle Corporation" No:111CV203163
), Oracle finds itself on the receiving end as Hewlett-Packard Comp. (
) looks to punish it with
regarding Oracle's decision to kill support for Itanium servers.
I. Oracle and HP Quibble About Fate of Itanium
Itanium is an alternative architecture
from Intel Corp. (
) specialized for mission-critical systems. While pricey and outdated in some ways, Itanium remained for many customers remained the best option, hence constituting a small, but lucrative annual revenue stream for Intel.
Intel's latest Itanium,
launched in Feb. 2010 after years of delays. It was originally announced in Feb. 2003 under the code-name "Tanglewood". [Image Source: Intel]
With recent statements from Intel raising the possibility of a merger of the Itanium and x86 architectures, some companies -- including Microsoft Corp. (
) and Red Hat, Inc. (
) -- perceived that as a signal that Itanium was going the way of the dinosaur. Both companies dropped their support, putting substantial pressure on the Itanium ecosystem.
Oracle, not looking to be left in the dust, also announced its decision to jump ship. Unfortunately that move may have breached its contractual obligations to HP -- or so HP says.
The pair was unable to settle their differences in mediation, so the court trial will be kicking off today. HP seeks $4B USD in damages. Oracle's lawyers claim that HP "cannot support" its allegations of breach-of-contract. Further, they allege that Intel and HP had a secret understanding that Itanium was headed for end-of-life. Oracle
over that alleged understanding, accusing HP of false advertising.
The spat is expected to draw in Intel CEO Paul Otellini to set the record straight about
, although Intel is not a plaintiff or defendant in the case.
The court conflict is set in scenic Santa Clara, Calif. [Image Source: Treehugger]
The contract dispute between the two California-based companies (HP and Oracle) will take place in state court -- the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Santa Clara, to be specific. Santa Clara is located at the heart of Silicon Valley in northern California (in the Bay Area) and is home to Intel's headquarters.
II. Judge Likens Case to "Divorce" Proceeding
The first phase of the trial, presided over by Judge James Kleinberg, will constitute the Judge seeking to verify whether a contract still exists between the two companies.
The spat between the software and hardware giant is particularly acrimonious. Its roots might trace to
Oracle's acquisition of Sun
recent business software purchases
, both of which put the companies out of their traditional realm and into direct competition with the others' products. Further hurt feelings stem from Oracle CEO Larry Ellison's decision to
appoint dear friend and former HP CEO Mark Hurd
as a co-President after HP fired him.
Mark Hurd ex-HP CEO is now an Oracle co-President and Oracle CEO Larry Ellison's right-hand man. [Image Source: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images]
While HP had no interest in keeping Mr. Hurd after he
lied to board members
, they were quite upset with him for jumping to the frenemy, calling the decision "anti-consumer". HP
tried to stifle
the appointment, but Mr. Hurd was eventually
allowed to work at Oracle
Judge Kleinberg acknowledge the bitter nature of the spat commenting, "This case appears to be the end of a marriage."
The case is an important one for Oracle, who in the wake of the Android defeats will likely look to save face with this major dispute. Another loss could be perceived as a sign of weakness from investors -- something Oracle desperately wants to avoid.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Yet another HP blunder...
6/5/2012 9:05:51 AM
Yeah 1999 would have sounded a little closer to the correct answer there.
"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
Jury Finds Google Innocent of Java Patent Infringement
May 23, 2012, 3:53 PM
Top Anti-Android Blogger Florian Mueller is Being Paid by Oracle
May 8, 2012, 5:54 AM
Deadlocked Jury Shifts Momentum from Oracle to Google in Android Java Trial
May 7, 2012, 9:52 PM
Oracle Steps up Lawsuit Against HP, Alleges Itanium Conspiracy
November 21, 2011, 1:27 PM
Quick Note: Meg Whitman Says She Will Continue Apotheker's Plans for HP
September 23, 2011, 12:11 PM
"Prepare to be Punished": Microsoft is Killing OneDrive With Cuts, Blames Users
November 3, 2015, 8:23 PM
Apple's New "Magic" Peripheral Line Packs High Tech, High Prices
October 13, 2015, 9:39 PM
Samsung Adds 2 TB 850 EVO, PRO SSDs for $800, $1000
July 7, 2015, 4:23 PM
Seagate Senior Researcher: Heat Can Kill Data on Stored SSDs
May 13, 2015, 2:49 PM
How to Recover Most Apps After Your NVIDIA Driver Crashes in Windows 10
March 30, 2015, 12:54 PM
Tinkerer Gets Old School Mac Plus Running on the Modern Web
March 24, 2015, 6:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information