Facebook Wants Childen Under 13 to Join Its Site
June 4, 2012 10:17 AM
comment(s) - last by
Facebook is looking to bypass privacy/safety issues and make a little money in the process
Facebook already has over 900 million users, but it's looking to
grab the attention
of a new age group -- children under 13.
Currently, Facebook bans its social networking services to those under the age of 13. Users are required to fill in their date of birth when creating a Facebook account, ensuring that all who join are over that age limit. Facebook does this because of privacy concerns, where children could potentially be exposed to inappropriate content shared on the site or be contacted by strangers.
However, many children lie when filling in their birth date to bypass Facebook's "13 or older" rule. In fact, Consumer Reports said that 7.5 million children under the age of 13 had a Facebook account last year. Over 5 million users under the age of 10 had a Facebook page as well. Another study, conducted by Microsoft, showed that 36 percent of parents were aware that their children under the age of 13 had joined the social network.
This puts Facebook in an awkward position because people have found a way around its rules, which could potentially put children in danger. Inevitably, people would blame Facebook for a child's harm despite the disclaimer that users must be 13 years of age or older.
Now, Facebook is looking for ways to allow this younger age group to join without
worrying about privacy and safety
. A couple of solutions include connecting children's Facebook accounts to their parents', where their activity could be monitored, and parental controls where a child's parents can see and control every aspect of the child's Facebook experience, including who they become friends with.
"Recent reports have highlighted just how difficult it is to enforce age restrictions on the Internet, especially when parents want their children to access online content and services," said Facebook. "We are in continuous dialogue with stakeholders, regulators and other policy makers about how best to help parents keep their kids safe in an evolving online environment."
This new move could benefit Facebook a few different ways. Not only does this cover Facebook in the event of a dangerous situation happening to a child, but drawing this age group in could also mean dollar signs in the way of gaming.
Last year, Zynga, which is a game development company associated with Facebook, made up 12 percent of the social network's $3.7 billion revenue. Facebook users play Zynga's games through Facebook and pay for certain features of the game if they please. Bringing children under 13 to the site could give the gaming sector of the social network a major boost.
While this seems like a great financial revelation for Facebook, it will have to deal with child privacy groups first. Some have already
expressed concern with Facebook's latest idea
, saying that the vast site is no place for children.
Facebook must also face a pending review by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is considering applying the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act of 1998 and regulating what information can be taken from children on the Internet. With Facebook constantly collecting information from its users, this could be a big issue.
Facebook is always looking for new ways to engage its audience. For instance, there are rumors that the social network plans to
release its first smartphone
next year, where it will provide the software and HTC may provide the hardware. With Facebook stretching into every realm of our lives, it will be difficult keep children away from the site for long.
The Wall Street Journal
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
In related news...
6/4/2012 12:51:02 PM
...tobacco companies want children under 13 to smoke.
I mean, seriously, the sooner you get kids addicted to something, whether it be Facebook or cigarettes, the more likely they are to stay addicted...
RE: In related news...
6/4/2012 2:18:51 PM
I for one have gotten completely tired of anti-smoking ads. Anyone who does not know how bad cigarettes are for you does not have a functioning brain. This continued campaign, paid for by cigarette companies themselves by government mandate, is absurd.
How in the hell it is legal that an industry should pay to kill itself off is beyond me. Just another example of judicial activism in my view. We have the message and we know its bad for us. People obviously still choose to smoke. The continued ads are just ridiculous and annoying.
PS - I have never smoked a single cigarette in my life because I find the smell to be disgusting.
RE: In related news...
6/4/2012 9:33:11 PM
They're not paying to kill themselves since the ads are not effective, one movie star, singer, bad boy with a cigarette (at the must go to party) in their mouth can cancel the effects of 10,000 ads.
The tobacco industry settlement was a farce just like the no smoking campaign, they purposely ensured that during the settlements by not allowing effective ads against them paid by the settlement money.
And governments make so much money off cigarette sales they definitely won't kill them off, just another two faced farce the sheeple have fallen for.
"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard
Facebook Gets Permission to Expand Headquarters in Menlo Park
May 30, 2012, 3:33 PM
Report: Facebook to Launch Phone "By Next Year", Eyes HTC Purchase
May 28, 2012, 12:00 PM
Facebook, FTC Settle Privacy Case
November 30, 2011, 9:46 AM
Facebook Prompts More Privacy Anxieties with Facial Recognition Feature
June 8, 2011, 10:28 AM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Instagram Bans "Curvy" From Hashtag Searches, Provokes "Plus Sized" Outrage
July 16, 2015, 1:20 PM
Mozilla Promise Punctual Windows 10 Firefox Release, Teases at iOS Arrival
July 7, 2015, 3:08 PM
Most Popular Articles
Why the U.S. Won't be Able to Ban Google's New Huawei Marshmallow Flagship Phone
October 3, 2015, 5:27 PM
Microsoft Band 2 Stays Focused on Fitness, Debuts Oct. 30, Priced at $249
October 6, 2015, 9:16 PM
Microsoft's HD-500 ("Display Dock"), the Magic Sauce Behind Continuum
October 6, 2015, 5:30 PM
Apple's First Fixes to iOS 9 Land w/ iOS 9.0.1 Release
September 23, 2015, 6:11 PM
Microsoft Lumia 950 and 950 XL Finally Launch, w/ Windows 10, Liquid Cooling
October 6, 2015, 3:35 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information