backtop


Print 52 comment(s) - last by delphinus100.. on May 25 at 8:59 PM

Dragon capsule is on its way to the ISS

After scrubbing its planned launch on May 19 due to a faulty check valve, SpaceX proved its critics wrong this morning by successfully launching the Falcon 9 rocket with the Dragon capsule perched atop. The momentous launch took place at 3:44am EST this morning from Cape Canaveral, Florida.
 
SpaceX CEO Elon Musk -- also known for his ventures with Tesla Motors -- was understandably ecstatic about the success, and expressed his joy on Twitter, stating, “Falcon flew perfectly!! Dragon in orbit, comm locked and solar arrays active!! Feels like a giant weight just came off my back.”
 
With its solar arrays deployed, the Dragon capsule is on its way to the International Space Station (ISS) and should dock with the station on Friday.


Artist's rendition of the Dragon space capsule in orbit with its solar arrays deployed [Source: SpaceX]
 
John P. Holdren, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, issued this statement on behalf of The White House regarding the launch:
 
Congratulations to the teams at SpaceX and NASA for this morning’s successful launch of the Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. Every launch into space is a thrilling event, but this one is especially exciting because it represents the potential of a new era in American spaceflight. Partnering with U.S. companies such as SpaceX to provide cargo and eventually crew service to the International Space Station is a cornerstone of the President’s plan for maintaining America’s leadership in space. This expanded role for the private sector will free up more of NASA’s resources to do what NASA does best -- tackle the most demanding technological challenges in space, including those of human space flight beyond low Earth orbit. I could not be more proud of our NASA and SpaceX scientists and engineers, and I look forward to following this and many more missions like it.
 
This marks the first time that a privately funded mission has made its way to the ISS. Upon successful completion of the mission, SpaceX will secure a lucrative $1.6 billion contract with NASA under which it will make 12 deliveries to the ISS.

Sources: SpaceX, WhiteHouse.gov



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: W0000t!
By MrBlastman on 5/22/2012 11:01:02 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
IF spacex can continue to pull off what they are doing, it WILL be a game changer.


I wouldn't say that _until_ they come up with some new, revolutionary ideas of their own _and_ pull them off _without_ government assistance. This is something I think Musk is incapable of.

I do hope I am proven wrong. :)


RE: W0000t!
By danjw1 on 5/22/2012 11:49:05 AM , Rating: 2
They are already getting stuff into space FAR CHEAPER then anyone else can. They want to reuse all parts of the rockets, though they have found it harder then expected to reuse the first stage. So the potential is there to lower the price even more. If you don't see this a significant, then you might want to check out what the Chinese government has to say about the projected costs of the Falcon 9 Heavy. They pewpew it, just like you do. This company is changing the game, if you don't see it, then you aren't looking.


RE: W0000t!
By The Raven on 5/22/2012 11:54:35 AM , Rating: 3
As long as he can do it cheaper than the gov't then I'm loving it. But then again, to do anything cheaper than the gov't is not much of an accomplishment.


RE: W0000t!
By MrBlastman on 5/22/2012 12:06:15 PM , Rating: 2
I'm all for private space programs, they _are_ the future for sure. I'm cynical because of a. Musk's track record with Tesla (pathetic) and b. I'm aware that as soon as his program has an accident (it will at some point) they won't be free from legal repercussions like the Government is.

With Musk's utter inability to make a dime in Tesla, how on Earth will SpaceX be able to shoulder the litigious burden it might face once they do have an accident?

Private business is about making a profit! Musk has never made a profit outside of Paypal and that was a decade ago. His pockets aren't limitless here.

I reiterate that Branson at least is trying to do something different. Sure, his concepts aren't LEO for great length, but it is a different idea. Not the same old... lets pump chemical rockets right up into the sky!

I suppose if we look at SpaceX as a stopgap they are filling that. They'll give NASA some way to get equipment up to the ISS without relying on the Pinkos. ;)

It's sad NASA has been butchered like they have been. Government has red tape where business has lawsuits... ugh.


RE: W0000t!
By SPOOFE on 5/22/2012 4:49:58 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
With Musk's utter inability to make a dime in Tesla, how on Earth will SpaceX be able to shoulder the litigious burden it might face once they do have an accident?

I don't see how the two are related. The man is engaging in multiple projects with multiple levels of success. Are you saying you've never had failures in addition to your successes? Ridiculous.

quote:
I reiterate that Branson at least is trying to do something different.

He wants to send more Justin Timberlakes into space on pleasure cruises. Appealing the the Haves and their ability to spend money the Have-nots can only dream about may be a path to success, but it's certainly not "something different".


RE: W0000t!
By Ringold on 5/22/2012 4:54:49 PM , Rating: 2
To add to your post, they're projects that I don't think rational people would expect to produce good quarterly results. SpaceX investments now I wouldn't think would pay big dividends in Q4 2012, but perhaps big ones in Q1 2017 if it steals some of the commercial launch market share.

I can say this: Whatever Musk's faults, at least he isn't sitting on his money and bouncing between fancy ultra-luxury resorts and mansions the world over. He's doing what I like seeing billionaires do; have fun, and push the envelope forward at the same time for everybody. (Something else for liberals to consider: SpaceX wouldn't exist in a country run by the likes of France's Hollande, as no one would ever accumulate the money necessary to get it started)


RE: W0000t!
By FaaR on 5/22/2012 8:12:45 PM , Rating: 3
France has many billionaires, so you're incorrect there.

Also, almost no billionaires do what Musk is doing, so having a lot of billionaires and hoping they'll engage in cutting-edge R&D for the benefit of humanity is quite simply a self-defeating endeavor. There's no point in striving for such a society, because the average billionaire is much more likely to invest in yachts, mansions and luxury cars and goods for themselves than anything that would further spaceflight, for example.

That's why trickle-down economics is such a dismal, utter failure. Musk is a statistical outlier. Most private enterprising is not created by extremely rich people sinking their own personal fortunes into a new venture. Sad, but true.


RE: W0000t!
By Reclaimer77 on 5/22/2012 8:29:10 PM , Rating: 2
You're so wrong it's not even funny. Trickle down a failure? Private enterprising not created by rich people using venture capital?

Idiot. Venture capitalists are quite literally the glue that holds innovation and invention together. They don't just invest capital, but put inventors and innovators in collaboration with the market and technical expertise to bring products forth successfully.

You're also an idiot because Musk isn't doing this to "benefit mankind". He's doing this for profit. He saw an opportunity where he could fill a much needed demand and capitalized on it. He's a businessman, hello?


RE: W0000t!
By ZmaxDP on 5/23/2012 6:22:07 PM , Rating: 1
He's also missing the fact that mansions, yachts, hotels, Gucci bags, and every other goods or services purchased by them ARE EMPLOYING PEOPLE WITH LESS MEANS.

It just makes me LIVID when people bitch about the rich spending money as if it is rude or wasteful. PLEASE SPEND MONEY. It employs people so they don't get freakin' fired.

</rant>


RE: W0000t!
By Visual on 5/23/2012 7:59:54 AM , Rating: 2
Well I think you are not viewing this quite fairly.
SpaceX is not just counting on "grants", instead they have a good deal of cash from "contracts", even if a lot of them come from NASA/the government and are payed up front... there is still a difference. It is money for services that SpaceX will eventually perform.

And while I can understand concerns about such types of contracts in the event that SpaceX just suck up the cash then declare failure and inability to perform their part, my impression for Elon Musk is that he really wants to succeed in this. It may be a bit like a foolish boy's dream, but the good part of that is at least he will give everything trying to achieve it.

Also, so far SpaceX is doing quite great, I see no reasons for concern... if their docking attempt doesn't bring down the space station tomorrow :p

BTW, I also think Tesla is doing quite great, what's your gripe with it? Yeah, they didn't get an electric car into every man's garage overnight, but they seem to be doing ok. Hell, until recently they were the only ones even trying. You gotta respect that.


RE: W0000t!
By JediJeb on 5/22/2012 11:57:43 AM , Rating: 2
I think SpaceX has done one of the things I had hopped would happen, and that is taking tech that NASA had developed and was good engineering work yet mothballed, and updating it and making it useful again. NASA and other government agencies have a tendency of making something that is really innovative and works well and then discarding it just to introduce the next new shiny thing they are working on even though the old stuff is still good. The only thing I have not seen them completely ignore has been the Hubble Space Telescope. But if the Webb Telescope had been finished already you can bet that Hubble would have been de-orbited already even though it is still producing valuable results.


RE: W0000t!
By MrBlastman on 5/22/2012 12:08:45 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
NASA and other government agencies have a tendency of making something that is really innovative and works well and then discarding it just to introduce the next new shiny thing they are working on even though the old stuff is still good.


Sure but the quantity of good stuff that has come out of NASA is incredible. I'm with you on taking shelved ideas, they do a lot of that and if people can do that, great.

What I'm worried here is people won't be compelled to push the limits and find new paradigms to challenge.


RE: W0000t!
By SPOOFE on 5/22/2012 4:52:09 PM , Rating: 3
quote:
What I'm worried here is people won't be compelled to push the limits and find new paradigms to challenge.

But that's what NASA has become. It's a bloated bureacracy that spends too much of its budget playing politics, and SpaceX has managed to render the outdated "let's pretend it's still 1969" mentality obsolete.


RE: W0000t!
By delphinus100 on 5/25/2012 8:42:44 PM , Rating: 2
Better mousetrap.

Radically new things may well be in their future, but sometimes success is simply being better and/or cheaper at a known product or service.

"It's nice to be first. The money is in being second."
- Larry Bell, aerospace engineer


"There's no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki