quote: Which doesn't matter because it gets $7,500+ subsidy right off the bat. Give me a $20k gas credit and hey, I'm all ears.
quote: And we've already established that EV's utterly fail as transportation devices. Yet you keep using any argument, any skewed math and assumptions to state otherwise.
quote: "We shouldn't subsidize EV technology because EVs are bad."
quote: I guess I am really confused.
quote: Providing private market subsidies is bad, regardless of the merits of the technology! Private market subsidies distort economic evaluation and spending.
quote: quote:"We shouldn't subsidize EV technology because EVs are bad."What!? No.
quote: So am I. I'm confused why you keep factoring in fuel costs besides the fact that it skews the argument more in EV's favor. We're talking about the cost of the vehicle straight up.
quote: First off people don't really pay cash for new vehicles. They are financed. So how much extra financing are you paying for that EV over the course of a say 5 year loan?
quote: I think it should be clear than you DO think about the cost of fuel.
quote: Then why the constant Strawmen arguements that EVs are bad.
quote: If we as a nation want to -lower- imported oil, lower transporation costs, increase national security, lower real pollution, and C02 levels...
quote: I'd prefer the market where, when appropriate, people buy EVs, PHEVs, HEVs, Diesels ICEs, and Gasoline ICEs than having Mass Transit versus Gasoline ICE.
quote: Ugh I rest my case. Maybe if people supporting EV's weren't so inherently Liberal I could get behind them more. I don't know.
quote: Except this doesn't work. The market has shown EVERY TIME that when offered a choice, consumers will pick standard ICE vehicles over all others.
quote: I don't think "EV's are bad". I'm just pissed off how they've become tied into the current political atmosphere, the clear anti-ICE agenda and "green" nonsense
quote: The market has shown EVERY TIME that when offered a choice, consumers will pick standard ICE vehicles over all others.