backtop


Print 31 comment(s) - last by CZroe.. on May 21 at 9:13 PM


Apple's iPhone used in Mission:Impossible 4  (Source: cultofmac.com)
Apple devices have made 891 appearances in TV shows in 2011, which is an increase from 613 appearances in 2009

Apple came, saw, and conquered many aspects of the tech world, but now, the Cupertino-based gadget maker is seeing its name in lights as it works to conquer Hollywood as well.

Product placement in television and film has become a big deal for companies with devices to show off. The reason for this is that consumers are using DVRs and video streaming services more and more. DVRs allow users to bypass commercials, and video services like Netflix do not have commercials. Without television commercials, it's harder for companies like Apple to advertise their latest products.

That's where television shows and movies come in. Product placement within the TV shows and movies have become an increasingly important avenue in advertisement. It's not a new form of advertising by any means, but over time, tech giant Apple has made it a crucial part of its ad technique without paying a penny.

According to Nielsen, a global marketing and advertising research company, Apple devices have made 891 appearances in TV shows in 2011, which is an increase from 613 appearances in 2009. Also, Brandchannel, which tracks product appearances, reported that Apple products popped up in over 40 percent of movies that struck gold in the weekly box office in 2011. This is huge compared to most brands.

While most companies have to pay to have their products featured in a TV show or film, Apple has managed to do so for free by simply offering as many free iPhones, iPads, and Macs as needed.

"Apple won't pay to have their products featured, but they are more than willing to hand out an endless amount of computers, iPads and iPhones," said Gavin Polone, producer of HBO's Curb Your Enthusiasm. "It's kind of a graft situation."

Apple's product placement goes back to the 1990's when the PowerMac laptop made an appearance in Mission: Impossible. Now, the latest Mission:Impossible movie is featuring about eight minutes of Apple products like iPhones, iPads and Macs. The approximate value of this screen time is $23 million.

Apple has the right idea with TV and movie product placement. According to Ace Metrix, an ad tracking firm, test audiences recently gave an iCloud commercial a 15 percent less favorable rating than previous commercials. With traditional commercials on the decline, free advertisement on TV and in movies seems to be the way to go.

Source: Businessweek



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: More Obvious = Less Effective
By Solandri on 5/15/2012 5:07:24 AM , Rating: 2
This is the solution to TV/movie piracy, not DRM. Shows are given away for free, and the producers will make money by selling advertisements in the shows. The ads will have to be product placement to prevent them from being edited out of the program. The more your show is distributed and shared (i.e. "pirated"), the more money you can demand from advertisers for subsequent episodes.

That isn't the answer the studios want to hear. But it's the answer that makes sense in the current reality - where I can send gigabytes of data to someone else on the other side of the world in a few hours.


RE: More Obvious = Less Effective
By The Raven on 5/15/2012 10:33:07 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
This is the solution to TV/movie piracy, not DRM. Shows are given away for free, and the producers will make money by selling advertisements in the shows. The ads will have to be product placement to prevent them from being edited out of the program.
When TMNT (the first one with Corey Feldman) came out back in 1990 I remember reading about product placement in Nintendo Power. The mentioned how much Dominoes had to pay to get the pizza dude role in the movie. And that is just when my young azz discovered what was going on. I have little hope that things will get any better based on that since things have not changed much since then.
quote:
The more your show is distributed and shared (i.e. "pirated"), the more money you can demand from advertisers for subsequent episodes.
Yeah I don't think this is not the right way to look at it. In reality monetary value should be placed on the effort/talent needed to produce the movie. Not placed on the value that society gets out of the movie. Advertisers just pay what they must to compete with other advertisers: highest bidder. It has nothing to do with the filmmaker's operations.


RE: More Obvious = Less Effective
By CZroe on 5/21/2012 9:13:50 PM , Rating: 2
And then they got smeared when the movie depicted them delivering late. :D


"If a man really wants to make a million dollars, the best way would be to start his own religion." -- Scientology founder L. Ron. Hubbard














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki