Print 41 comment(s) - last by Jeffk464.. on May 10 at 9:55 AM

There are three main reasons for anxiety related to bandwidth caps: invisible balances, mysterious processes and multiple users

A new Georgia Tech/Microsoft study shows that bandwidth caps are putting unnecessary strain on users in South Africa.

Marshini Chetty, a Microsoft Research intern and postdoctoral researcher from Georgia Tech's School of Interactive Computing, conducted a study that shows negative user experiences associated with bandwidth caps. However, Chetty believes the pressure put on Internet users could be relieved with the right data usage monitoring tools.

The study, which is titled "'You're Capped!' Understanding the Effects of Bandwidth Caps on Broadband Use in the Home," was conducted in South Africa. Chetty met with 12 households in the country, where caps were universal until February 2010. South African Internet service providers (ISPs) generally range caps up to 9 GB of data monthly, but some plans are as low as only 1 GB of data, which is significantly lower than 150 GB - 250 GB caps in the U.S.

According to Chetty, there are three main reasons for anxiety related to bandwidth caps: invisible balances, mysterious processes and multiple users.

Invisible balances refer to households having to pay extra fees for small bandwidth cap increases. When this method wasn't ideal, some families would visit other family members to use the Internet, or just switch from desktop PCs to smartphones.

Mysterious processes mean the household's inability to identify which programs are consuming the most bandwidth. Videos and downloads eat up much more of the monthly cap then Web browsing, but not everyone is aware of this and can be cu off in the middle of their activity because the cap reached full capacity.

Some users would even skip software updates because it ate up too much of the monthly bandwidth cap.

"People's behavior does change when limits are placed on Internet access -- just like we've seen happen in the smartphone market -- and many complain about usage-based billing, but no one has really studied the effects it has on consumer activity," said Chetty. "We would also hear about people 'saving' bandwidth all month and then binge downloading toward the end of their billing period.

"We were surprised to learn that many of the households we studied chose not to perform regular software updates in order to manage their cap. This activity can be benign for some applications, inadvisable for others and downright dangerous in certain cases. For example, not installing security patches on your system can leave you vulnerable to viruses and other sorts of cyber attacks."

Multiple users in a household can also add to the strain of bandwidth caps because not all family members can monitor each other's data usage throughout the month. One may be consuming much more data than the other's, leaving the rest of the household unknowingly limited with Internet use.

Chetty has recognized that bandwidth caps can be problematic, and is urging ISPs to come up with better tools that allow households to monitor their data usage and also create better alternatives for when these caps are met. 

"As ISPs move toward usage-based pricing, we need to keep in mind the reactive behaviors that consumers adopt and the consequences of those behaviors," said Chetty. "Because when you have broadband caps, you will use the Internet differently.

"So if you're going to have caps, you should empathize with your users and offer ways for customers to see how their data are being used and who is using them."

There appears to be strain associated with mobile bandwidth as well. In January 2012, England-based mobile advisory company Arieso reported that the top 1 percent of heavy users are bandwidth hogs, accounting for half of the entire world's mobile traffic.

Source: Georgia Tech

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Comcast
By kmmatney on 5/8/2012 8:39:13 PM , Rating: 2
My current data cap is 250 GB with Comcast, and I've never come close. With 5 internet users in the family, and often several friends over using the internet, I've still only ever hit 100GB once. I can see how a low cap could be stressful, though, and agree that it would keep people from wanting to stream TV over the internet a win for Comcast.

RE: Comcast
By TacticalTrading on 5/9/2012 3:27:29 PM , Rating: 2
What would happen if they set a low a cap?

Simple, at my house, if we got close to the cap, the internet would be turned off to avoid overage charges.
Think anyone else would behave this way?
Also: I would demand Every App and OS tell me how much bandwidth they intend to use BEFORE using it. Think of it as going back to the connect only when I need to mode. (which is frighteningly all the time)
I would want Email clients to tell me how much bandwidth they are going to use before fetching the mail.

IMHO, it never happens. the current 250GB cap is a check on heavy users, which is all they really need to do.

Heavy control of this sort always sounds good, but in the long run, it will result in lower revenue and fewer subscribers (especially in 4g areas)


RE: Comcast
By Jeffk464 on 5/10/2012 9:51:21 AM , Rating: 2
That is exactly the point Comcast wants to implement caps that will deter you from using neflix and hulu. They will then offer you their own streaming service that won't effect your data cap. Its just an attempt(probably successfully) to try to maintain their government enforced monopoly. The way around this is to go with ISP's that don't provide cable TV service as they don't have a vested interest in blocking you from getting your content from hulu, netflix, amazon, or iTunes. I put an antenna on the roof and get my movies from redbox and I'm really enjoying the extra $100 in my pocket every month.

RE: Comcast
By Jeffk464 on 5/10/2012 9:55:15 AM , Rating: 3
If you invest that $100 a month over your working life you probably save enough to pay for 5-10 years worth of retirement.

"It's okay. The scenarios aren't that clear. But it's good looking. [Steve Jobs] does good design, and [the iPad] is absolutely a good example of that." -- Bill Gates on the Apple iPad

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki