Deadlocked Jury Shifts Momentum from Oracle to Google in Android Java Trial
May 7, 2012 9:52 PM
comment(s) - last by
Deadlocked jury has Google moving swiftly to declare a mistrial
Oracle Corp.'s (
) made a bold gambit when it
refused a licensing settlement
with Google Inc. (
) in lieu of
a trial by jury
. That gamble may yet prove an unwise decision. The world's largest smartphone operating system maker (Google) appears to be on the verge of a victory, after a jury was unconvinced that it committed actionable infringement of Oracle's Java intellectual property.
I. Google Scores a Win -- Mostly
The jury was in agreement that Google's Android infringed on Oracle's patented Java virtual machine, a technology that it acquired from Sun Microsystems in
a major $7B USD 2010 acquisition
. But the jury today said that an "impasse has been reached" regarding whether Google's infringement was negated by fair use.
The jury had to deliver a unanimous verdict to presiding
Judge William Alsup
U.S. Federal District Court for the Northern District of California
(San Francisco). The responses are seen below:
[Images Source: The Verge]
The jury' answers aren't altogether perfect for Google. They do find that Google infringed on the general structure of Java and accuse it of lifting a specific algorithm (the rangeCheck method in two *TimSort.java classes/files). But they also absolved it of two other specific infringement accusations and absolve it from the documentation infringement claims.
This is a larger victory when you consider that Google already admitted to infringing the *TimSort.java classes. In other words, any files that Google argued it did not infringe on, the jury generally agreed.
A Californian jury largely bought Google's arguments, rejecting many of Oracle's infringement allegations against Android. [Image Source: ZuperDZigh]
The jurors also ruled that Google has cause to believe based on its interaction with Sun that it would not need a license. But, interestingly, the jurors admonish Google saying that was not sufficient to circumvent obtaining a license.
Oracle tried to make light of the bad news, trying to claim that the *TimSort.java infringements entitled it to the big damages it originally sought. Judge Alsup quickly dispelled this notion, tell Oracle's lawyers that while damages were likely, they had only prevailed on 1/3 specific
source infringement claims
and would thus likely see
their requested damages shrink substantially
The deadlocked jury concludes the copyright phase of the trial, which will then go before the expert justice, Judge Alsup, for the patent phase. The copyright phase saw many of the two companies' top executives,
such as Oracle CEO Larry Ellison
and Google CEO Larry Page.
Potentially a big reason for the jury's favorable ruling towards Google came from blockbuster witness Jonathan Schwartz, former CEO of Sun and big fan of the Android operating system. Mr. Schwartz gave Android the thumbs up back in the Sun era, in a high-profile blog which
Oracle tried unsuccessfully to purge
from the internet.
While the jury clearly felt that Mr. Schwartz did not have sufficient authority to authorize the use without a formal written agreement, it also upheld a key Google claim, that it reasonably contacted Sun seeking to ensure that unlicensed use was kosher. That jury confirmation may prove a key setback for Oracle in the damages phase as it paints Google as a sympathetic party who maybe goofed on failing to get a formal license, but who made a sincere effort to avoid misbehavior.
Judge Alsup will almost certainly use the jury's findings in his final ruling.
II. SSO Will Prove the Final Battle
(Note: The article previously misused the phrase "patent" when referring to Oracle's SSO IP claims, this is actually a copyright as readers pointed out. Thanks!)
The copyright phase isn't over -- not quite yet. Oracle still has one trick up its sleeve -- the SSO copyright.
Even as Google moves to declare the jury portion a mistrial (likely preventing both damages and retrial), Oracle is desperately preparing its May 10 filing to try to prove that the structure, sequence, and organization (SSO) of the Java application programming interface (API) is worthy of a creative copyright.
An SSO patent is kind of like taking non-copyrightables -- e.g. boards, shingles, concrete, and siding -- and attempting to copyright the compiled product on an architectural basis (say a copyright on a home design). The software engineering copyright methodology, which is used by super-corporations, remains a controversial tactic, as many argue that structure of code should not be copyrightable given the slippery slope precedent that creates.
The final battle will center around whether the structure of Java is patentable.
Google will also present its case why the SSO copyright methodology is invalid on May 10. Both companies can counter each others' arguments on May 14.
The SSO debate is likely Oracle's last hurrah. Win and it still has a hope to secure the kind of infringement ruling that could allow it to ban Android handsets and force Google into a painful license agreement. Lose and Oracle may essentially lose it all, particularly given that the jury found Google's infringement to be minimal, absolving Google of many or Oracle's toughest accusations.
Google was hopeful of today's events, commenting:
We appreciate the jury's efforts, and know that fair use and infringement are two sides of the same coin. The core issue is whether the APIs here are copyrightable, and that's for the court to decide. We expect to prevail on this issue and Oracle's other claims.
Oracle released a statement hoping to bolster its case, as well:
Oracle, the nine million Java developers, and the entire Java community thank the jury for their verdict in this phase of the case. The overwhelming evidence demonstrated that Google knew it needed a license and that its unauthorized fork of Java in Android shattered Java's central write once run anywhere principle. Every major commercial enterprise -- except Google -- has a license for Java and maintains compatibility to run across all computing platforms.
The pair will conclude their testy tango in court later this summer, giving closure to one the tech industry's most bitter legal spats.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: SSO is not a patent
5/8/2012 3:02:15 AM
+1 for constructive criticism.
RE: SSO is not a patent
5/8/2012 10:24:13 AM
The difficult thing about this trial is that APIs are partly functional and partly creative. If they were purely functional they would be the exactly same across languages, excepting the language syntax of course.
In the analogy above, the layout of car controls are a physical tangible thing, subject to patent law and not copyright law. A programming language is inherently a written language like a book so it falls under copyright law, not patent law. They are too different to compare. Now, a car manual can be copyrighted...and they are.
I'm not saying Oracle should win but I am saying that it's as cut and dried as some make it out to be.
RE: SSO is not a patent
5/8/2012 1:48:49 PM
Oracle is going to be hoisted by their own petard if they win this. Java borrows heavily from C/C++. If Oracle wins and it gets established in U.S. law that APIs and function call names can be copyrighted, then they (as the owners of Java) owe a whole lot of money to Stroustrup, Kernighan, and Ritchie for violating their copyrights. A lot more than Google owes them.
"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot
Oracle Plotted Titanic Phone-Seller From Remains of Palm, RIM
April 17, 2012, 11:20 PM
Android OS in the Hot Seat as Oracle v. Google Legal Battle Kicks Off Today
April 16, 2012, 4:00 PM
Oracle Rejects Google's Settlement Offer, Aims for Android Ban in Trial
April 3, 2012, 6:39 PM
Oracle's Anti-Android Java Lawsuit Likely to be Settled For Under $100M USD
March 23, 2012, 7:38 PM
Judge Suggests Google's Android was "Brazen" in Infringing Oracle's IP
July 25, 2011, 2:25 PM
ChipWorks Confirms Apple's iPhone A8 SoC Switch to TSMC
September 22, 2014, 1:41 PM
A Year After It Was First Announced, PlayStation TV Headed to U.S. for $99
September 22, 2014, 11:37 AM
4.7" Samsung Galaxy Alpha to Grace AT&T’s Network Sept. 26 for $199 on Contract
September 22, 2014, 11:16 AM
Apple Sells a Record 10M iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus Smartphones During Opening Weekend
September 22, 2014, 8:45 AM
Samsung Hopes to Launch Budget Tizen Device in India by November
September 19, 2014, 5:25 PM
Verizon Wireless Wi-Fi Calling Coming Next Year, Company Sees No Rush to Offer Feature
September 19, 2014, 11:45 AM
Most Popular Articles
HTC Preps Nexus 9 With Nvidia K1 64-Bit "Denver" SoC, Android L Onboard
September 10, 2014, 10:21 PM
Apple iPhone 6, iPhone 6 Plus Reviews Roll In
September 16, 2014, 9:13 PM
Big Media: If You Want Privacy, You're Probably a Pirate
September 18, 2014, 2:57 PM
Apple Cripples NFC in iPhone 6, 6+ With Developer Ban
September 17, 2014, 1:00 PM
"Decepticon" Driver Triumphs Over Cops in Massachusetts Court
September 5, 2014, 12:07 PM
Latest Blog Posts
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
Facebook Aims to Provide Internet to "Every Person in the World" with Drones, Satellites
Apr 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Retail Mobile Sites Experience Outages in Light of Simplexity's Bankruptcy
Mar 14, 2014, 8:48 AM
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information