Top EU Officials Say ACTA Piracy Pact Unlikely to Pass
May 7, 2012 7:39 PM
comment(s) - last by
Piracy pseudo-treaty may get the ax when the June vote arrives; privacy concerns abound
all the fuss and commotion
surrounding the near-passage and subsequent nosedive of the U.S. House of Representative's
) and the U.S. Senate's Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA), many believe that the U.S. and other nations are on the verge of embracing a far more Orwellian mandate in the name of fighting those pesky pirates -- the
I. ACTA -- A Gateway to Oppression?
ACTA deals in both digital and physical piracy. Some of its provisions apply to things such as counterfeit pharmaceuticals or
. But the majority of its controversial sections apply to policing the internet
The key word in the title Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement is "agreement". ACTA is not a treaty nor a law, although it seeks to assume powers typically only granted to such legislative instruments. Firmly supported by President Barack Obama, the bill was
long kept secret from the public
with drafts only available
A series of leaks forced the Obama administration to revise its big-media-friendly ACTA proposal several times. Now the administration is pushing the EU to sign.
[Image Source: Security Blog]
In April 2010, a public draft finally aired, trimming some of the more severe provisions of early drafts like mandatory three strikes internet blacklisting for pirates,
arbitrary device seizures
by border patrol agents, and charges for "imminent infringement" (a
form of thought-crime
consisting of charging people for merely visiting a known piracy site, under the assumption that they were likely to pirate next). Still the draft has drawn substantial controversy, even as it's gone through subsequent revisions to soften the blow. Many take issue with the fact that the Obama administration claims the
Prioritizing Resources and Organization for Intellectual Property Act of 2008
gives ex ante approval to the bill.
So far the Obama administration has joined with a handful of other top nation-states -- Australia, Canada, Japan, Morocco, New Zealand, Singapore, and South Korea -- to
embrace the measure
. But the proposal's ultimate retention or abandonment may hinge on the biggest nation bloc to not yet sign on the dotted line -- the European Union.
II. EU Leans Towards Rejection
The EU will deliver their ACTA verdict in June. But things aren't looking good for the agreement. Thus far only 22 out of 27 member states have signed the treaty. Notable abstainers include Denmark and Germany, where
waves of protests
have swayed the government to reconsider the pact, its high sticker cost, and its potentially ruinous privacy implications.
As a lead up to a full fledged examination by the European Court of Justice, as
by the European Commission following member complaints, the assistant European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) Giovanni Buttarelli delivered a
20 page analysis
of the tenative agreement.
The review was a mixed bag for ACTA's proponents. In it Mr. Buttarelli writes, "the monitoring of user's behavior and of their electronic communications on the internet [could be] highly intrusive to the private sphere of individuals and, if not implemented properly, may therefore interfere with their rights and freedoms."
The EU is weighing the cost of ACTA to freedoms. [Image Source: AFP]
Supporters will likely interpret the criticism as a request to reword the document yet again, in hopes of placating fears of a
V is for Vendetta
-like blanket of ubiquitous government surveillance.
With the abstainers agreeing to make a final decision in June, European Commissioner for Digital Agenda, Neelie Kroes, sounded decidedly pessimistic about passage prospects,
that EU citizens would "likely to be in a world without SOPA and without ACTA". Ms. Kroes -- perhaps best know for her epic
antitrust fines of Intel
) -- called on member states to "find solutions to make the Internet a place of freedom, openness, and innovation fit for all citizens."
She says the EU must tread a fine line between freedom and anarchy, commenting, "Yes the Internet should be open; and yes it should be free. But that is not the same as being a lawless wild west."
In responses to widespread public protests by
and other activist groups in the region, Ms. Kroes remarks, "This is a strong new political voice. And as a force for openness, I welcome it, even if I do not always agree with everything it says on every subject."
III. If No ACTA, What's Next for the EU
One compelling reason why the proposal may stall is simply money. While big media commands a deep-pocketed influence on EU politicians, much as it does in the U.S., the EU is also on the verge of a second dip in the cesspool of recession. An expensive proposal to police citizens comes at an especially inopportune time for a cash-strapped EU.
The question facing Europe is what's next, assuming ACTA fails. On the one hand, the EU is home to some enforcement extremists, such as
the copyright commission chief at the European Commission, Maria Martin-Prat
. Ms. Martin-Prat had previously worked for the International Federation of the Phonographic Industry -- parent organization of the
Recording Industry Association of America
(RIAA), Canada's CRIA, and Britain's BPI. While with the IFPI she focused her efforts on promoting digital rights management and on
outlawing users' rights to creating backup copies
of content they legally own.
Europe is a land of diverse opinions regarding how to "treat" the piracy issue.
[Image Source: Otto de Voogd/Flickr]
On the polar opposite end of the spectrum are politicians like Liberal Dutch MEP
and Swedish Pirate Party MEP
, who openly support movements like
and the Pirate Party. These figures accuse current leadership of corruption and favoritism in perpetuating what they view as a broken system. While they would ideally like to protect content creators, they argue that current laws are non-sensical, destructive, and punitive.
Which of the extremes will win out in the end remains to be seen as the copyright conflict intensifies.
Europa [1; EU Press Releases]
[3; Press Release]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Naieve to believe
5/8/2012 4:49:13 PM
Perhaps, but the symbolism in itself creates pressure. Nevermind the lobbying and corruption driving the rest.
"This is about the Internet. Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
Impeachable Offense? Obama Takes "Bribe", Institutes SOPA's Evil Twin ACTA
January 30, 2012, 11:15 AM
We the People: Populist Protest Kills SOPA (Again)
January 20, 2012, 3:10 PM
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: U.S. House Proposes Internet Inquisition, Pt. I
November 16, 2011, 6:50 PM
U.S. GOA: 40 Percent of Defense Supply Chain Damaged by Chinese Parts
June 17, 2011, 2:00 PM
EU's New Copyright Queen Sought to Criminalize Backup Copies, DRM Cracking
April 6, 2011, 12:55 PM
Twitter Senior VP: "Diversity is Important, But We Can’t Lower the Bar"
November 9, 2015, 9:59 AM
CNN Resorts to Internet Censorship to Promote Clinton Over Senator Sanders
October 15, 2015, 2:47 PM
Breaking Bad: How to Crash Google's Chrome Browser With Just 8 Characters
September 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Quick Note: Amazon UK Offers £10 Back on Any Order £50 or Over
August 3, 2015, 12:05 PM
Editorial: Reddit Allows Itself to be Hijacked as a Hate Platform For Racist Bigots
July 21, 2015, 6:32 PM
Mozilla and Facebook to Adobe: It's Time to Kill Flash
July 20, 2015, 6:30 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information