Print 15 comment(s) - last by eldakka.. on May 7 at 4:33 AM

Program will push expansion into uncovered, unprofitable regions, but is it worth the big sticker?

At a time when the federal government's spending is being increasingly scrutinized, the U.S. Federal Communications Commission has announced a new plan to pour almost a third of a billion dollars into the telecom industry.  The handouts will be delivered to U.S. telecommunications firms which bring 3G service within 2 years or 4G service within 3 years to underserved/uncovered regions.

Technically the new funding isn't all that new.  The creation of the "The Mobility Fund" marks the long awaited, long overdue revamp of the Universal Service Fund (USF), a Clinton-era program that was designed to increase land line phone service to rural areas of the U.S., which carriers refused to serve due to undesirable profit potential.

Today with land lines going the way of the T. rex, The Mobility Fund represents the USF's digital makeover.

The fund's targeted regions included large swatches of land in the American Rockies, including large parts of Idaho, Nevada and Washington state.  Alaska is another target for wireless expansion.  Under the FCC rules carriers will "bid" on the grant contracts in a reverse auction.  The contract will be rewarded to the carrier who agrees to provide the lowest cost service to customers if multiple carriers submit proposals for a region.

Bidding will run from June 27 to July 11, with the FCC announcing winners at the end of the $300M USD in targeted Phase I funding grants.  Winners must provide service to 75 percent road miles in the "census tract" for the region.

Just because the new plan doesn't create new government spending doesn't mean that its big sticker price won't provoke controversy and debate.  Some question whether the government should use taxpayers money while "playing wireless Santa Claus".

Alaska Highway
The new FCC Mobility Fund will reallocate existing dollars to pay for mobile network expansion in neglected areas such as the picturesque highways of Alaska. [Image Source: Planetware]

FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski counters such criticisms, stating, "For too many, dead zones in mobile coverage are too common, and today's action will help close those gaps.  By using market-based mechanisms, we'll ensure more gaps in mobile coverage are closed, and that every dollar is spent wisely and efficiently."

Under the plan, $500M USD will be provided each year in coming years to boost deployment and service speeds.  The FCC has also promised $50M USD to provide low-cost wireless services to Native American reservations.

Wireless technology is a key objective for President Obama, who has sought to overhaul outdated funding programs and free up spectrum via repurposing of government channels and special auctions.

Source: FCC [press release]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By integr8d on 5/3/2012 9:18:24 PM , Rating: 5
"For too many, dead zones in mobile coverage are too common, and today's action will help close those gaps. By using market-based mechanisms, we'll ensure more gaps in mobile coverage are closed, and that every dollar is spent wisely and efficiently."

It's always a bag of lies with these people. Google the words 'you've already paid $2000 for a fiber connection' and see what comes up.

This is just another government hand-out to their buddies in big business and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with underserved areas. It's another example of big government 'helping' someone at the expense of someone else... The reason telcos aren't in those areas is b/c there is >no market<. If those people that live in the fringe areas want 3G coverage, they need to move to where the action is; plain and simple.

And no. I don't feel like I owe people that live in the woods anything. And no. I don't care if they have to putt putt along with 2G internet or dial up. And no. I don't think they care that I have to drive an hour to go 3 miles in Los Angeles or breathe up smoggy air. It's just the lives we chose. Why the f*ck can't government respect that and stay out of everyone's business???

RE: ...
By morgan12x on 5/3/2012 9:49:38 PM , Rating: 5
I for one have chosen to live in the "middle of nowhere". But I also chose to pony up and help build a network that serves myself and neighbors 20+ Mb/subscriber of reliable internet via VDSL. It's not a matter of people not being able to get decent internet. It's a matter of them being willing to make it viable for a telecom to do it. I went to my regional telco and basically made a deal that if I got gauranteed customers they would build it. 6 months later.... great speeds for everyone.

RE: ...
By LTGJAMAICA on 5/3/12, Rating: -1
RE: ...
By FITCamaro on 5/4/2012 7:57:25 AM , Rating: 3
This is the way its supposed to be done. Through the free market and ingenuity. Not from a government hand out at the expense of tax payers.

RE: ...
By dgingerich on 5/4/2012 1:18:55 PM , Rating: 1
And yet the Telcos have taken the government handouts and promised to make the service available, yet never did it. All the while, they're making profits and paying executives bonuses from that money.

I'm all for free market, and I'm generally a conservative, yet this situation is known to me. These companies, Verizon, Formerly Qwest and now Century Link, etc, demanded the money, took the money, and still didn't deliver as they said they would. They're lying cheats, and business should not be done that way.

Business should be done honorably, delivering as you promise, when you promise, for the price you promise. These Telcos aren't doing that.

RE: ...
By FITCamaro on 5/4/2012 8:34:01 AM , Rating: 2
Well said.

RE: ...
By idiot77 on 5/4/12, Rating: 0
RE: ...
By FITCamaro on 5/4/2012 10:57:52 AM , Rating: 2
People make their choices in life. They are the ones who have to live with them.

Just as I don't expect anyone to pay off my debts, they shouldn't expect anyone to subsidize their internet.

RE: ...
By HoosierEngineer5 on 5/4/2012 12:27:47 PM , Rating: 1
Unfortunately, not always so. Coverage is not as good as the ISPs advertise. You may be one of the individuals who would move if you could not have internet service at their house. Not all people believe that is an adequate reason (ask my wife).

I live 5 miles from a city of 250,000 population. My service goes out for a while every couple of days. The ISP response? Take it or leave it.

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Update: Samsung Exchange Program Now in Progress
September 20, 2016, 5:30 AM
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki