Print 79 comment(s) - last by Trisped.. on May 7 at 8:20 PM

  (Source: Inquisitr)
Google is watching you

Did senior level Google Inc. (GOOG) managers know of and condone one of their engineer's audacious schemes to "wardrive"  the United States and Europe, using the company's "Street View" cars?  That's what U.S. government officials at the U.S. Federal Communications Commission are accusing [Scribd].

I. Google Managers Pre-Approved Spying on the Public

The new allegations come as the latest public relations setback for Google and its emabattled "Street View" program.  The company, whose informal slogan is "Don't be evil", claims to follow an "explore first, worry about profit later" mentality.  

Street View is the perfect embodiment of the Google ethos -- or so it seemed.  Launched in 2007, the project sent cars wired with cameras and high-tech communications equipment out on the roads in an unprecedented bid to provide street-level views of every stretch of road in the developed world.

The project was supposed to be for the betterment of mankind, or something along those lines.  But Google's altruism has been called into question when it was revealed that it was using its wired Street View vehicles as warwagons to troll unsecured wireles connection connections.  Further, the Google cars were discovered to be intercepting unsecured email and SMS traffic, data mining peoples' private conversations.

Google Street View
Google merrily used its Street View cars to data mine open WiFi connections.  Now the company claims it was just an innocenent mistake, blaming an unnamed engineer.
[Image Source: Jacopast/Wikipedia]

Google cast this hidden capability as a "bug" in the Street View code, created by a misguided engineer.  But according to the FCC while Google appears to have broken no laws in spying on people on unsecured lines, emails between the engineer in charge of the program and two other employees -- including a senior manager -- indicate that the program was not a rogue effort. It was in fact on the radar of at least some members of Google's senior staff.

II. Google Let Off With a Slap on the Wrist

The FCC did dock Google $25K -- essentially a slap on the wrist for the multi-billion dollar tech firm -- for impeding its investigation.  But Google claims it has nothing to hide and is publishing the emails described by the FCC, with the engineers and manager's names redacted.

Google now admits that five of its engineers were involved in the effort, but it denies knowingly playing unwelcome house guest on home internet connections across North America and Europe.

Google wide
Google has made billions off of figuring out your online habits and providing targeted marketing. [Image Source: My Life Untethered]

The internet firm categorizes the snooping as "minimal" and says that the program was not even big enough to be reviewed by the company's legal staff.  The program was launched in Oct. 2006 by "Engineer Doe" and was pre-approved by at least one manager who devoted resources to the project.

Google's lawyers admit that the engineer who spearheaded the effort did examine personal web traffic to establish a list of most-visited websites for certain IPs, but it insists that the abuse was not pervasive.

The company promises to try extra hard to protect the public's privacy in the future.  It insists that the data mining plot was simply an innocent mistake.  A company spokesperson writes, "The record... shows that Google's supervision of the Wi-Fi data collection project was minimal ... indeed, it appears that no one at the company carefully reviewed the substance of Engineer Doe's software code or the design document."

Despite the U.S. letting off Google with just a warning, the Mountain View, Calif.-based software company is facing the prospect of stiffer fines in multiple other nations, including member states of the European Union.  The company is also facing private lawsuits over the unwanted surveillance.

Sources: Scribd [FCC/Google], The Guardian

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: so..
By bug77 on 5/1/2012 6:43:31 AM , Rating: 2
Read this out loud:

Google appears to have broken no laws

The burglar analogy is an emotional one, but it is also incorrect. Unsecured wireless connections broadcast your signal well outside your home (in this case, on the street, no less). It's the same as shouting out loud and then protesting about somebody else hearing you.

RE: so..
By jRaskell on 5/1/2012 8:14:27 AM , Rating: 2
It may not be illegal, but it is ABSOLUTELY amoral, and for a company that loudly proclaims to take the highroad, that's almost just as bad.

RE: so..
By Tony Swash on 5/1/2012 8:58:42 AM , Rating: 2
I think one can be bad and still not break the law. Google were bad.

Here is perhaps a better metaphor. You leave your curtains open, a passing stranger walks across your front lawn and with their face pressed to your window watches you getting undressed. Leaving your curtains open was a bit careless, possibly silly. The peeping tom staring through your window is just plain bad.

RE: so..
By SongEmu on 5/1/2012 9:45:20 AM , Rating: 3
It's more like. I'm filling out some paperwork at my kitchen table, and some doofus peers in through the window and finds out my SSN. One does not simply *collect data* just by driving by. They have to be looking for it.

RE: so..
By thehatter on 5/1/2012 10:01:13 AM , Rating: 3
More like sitting on your front lawn reading your SSN through a megaphone, then blaming people for overhearing. All Google did was record what you said through the megaphone.

I don't think what they did was right, but it wasn't really wrong, and defiantly not theft. They may have to actively record the data, but they don't have to go looking for it.

RE: so..
By Schrag4 on 5/1/2012 1:30:53 PM , Rating: 3
It's hard not to hear a megaphone. It's easy not to read SMS messages and emails. If you park in a driveway where someone has an unsecured wireless router, their emails and SMS messages don't just pop up on your screen. Google wrote a program specifically to seek them out. Not quite the same thing as merely overhearing somone using a megaphone.

I mostly agree with the peeping tom analogy that's been thrown around. If you accidentally leave your curtains open, it may not be illegal for your neighbor to take pictures of you, but that doesn't mean it's the right thing for him or her to do.

RE: so..
By Smilin on 5/1/2012 10:16:11 AM , Rating: 3
You realize you broadcast all sorts of EM outside your home right?

It is quite possible to completely observe you in your home with a laser microphone and infrared camera as well as chemically sniff from outside of the property perimeter.

So you're saying none of this violates privacy since you are 'broadcasting' it outside your home? Bullcrap.

Failing to secure wireless is no more consent than leaving a door unlocked. Unsecured networks are not the same as public networks.

RE: so..
By tamalero on 5/1/2012 12:17:01 PM , Rating: 2
Actually, you're wrong on your last part..
if people wanted to have a PRIVATE NETWORK to NOT BE USEABLE BY ANYONE..
they could anytime you know.. USE PROTECTION.. or at least HIDE THE BROADCAST.

no security = public by default. (as many devices will hook to open networks automatically)
security = private (that's the fence that separates public with private PEOPLE!!!)

makes me wonder how many here actually know about IT Networking... and not just debating for drama.

RE: so..
By thehatter on 5/1/2012 12:30:42 PM , Rating: 2
makes me wonder how many here actually know about IT Networking... and not just debating for drama.

I have a feeling the vast majority of people are just trolls, and apple fan boys.

"If they're going to pirate somebody, we want it to be us rather than somebody else." -- Microsoft Business Group President Jeff Raikes

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
Snapchat’s New Sunglasses are a Spectacle – No Pun Intended
September 24, 2016, 9:02 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki