Print 18 comment(s) - last by DrChemist.. on Apr 20 at 11:09 AM

Global patent war could reach an armistice, sparing the companies billion in mutual business

Apple, Inc. (AAPL) and Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KS:005930) ended 2011 in a virtual tie for the global lead in smartphone sales.  Apple is the maker of the iconic iPhone, pivotal in the smartphone craze, which took off in 2007 after the early efforts of the likes of Research in Motion, Ltd. (TSE:RIM) and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT).  Samsung, meanwhile, has emerged as the world top phonemaker of the world's top platform -- Android.

I. Settlement Talks Announced

The pair on Tuesday agreed before Judge Lucy Koh to participate in "Alternative Dispute Resolution" (ADR) -- a series of settlement talks.  Judge Koh described:

The parties have indicated that they are willing to participate in a Magistrate Judge Settlement Conference ('MJSC'). ECF No. 873. Therefore, the parties are hereby referred to an MJSC with Magistrate Judge Joseph Spero with a 90-day deadline. As the parties have indicated in their joint statement, the chief executive officer and general counsel of Apple and the chief executive officer and general counsel of Samsung shall appear and participate at the MJSC.

While the settlement talks will take place in and primarily pertain to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California -- a San Francisco court -- a settlement deal could reach globally, ending the companies’ lawsuits against each other spanning twenty cases in ten different countries.

Samsung v. Apple
"Frenemys" Apple and Samsung have agreed to consider settling.
[Image Source: TechnoBuffalo]

Both companies have created controversy in their bids to ban each other’s best-selling products.

II. Controversial Cases

Apple's ban hopes hinge upon patents such as its prized multi-touch patent, which describes:

A touch panel having a transparent capacitive sensing medium configured to detect multiple touches or near touches that occur at the same time and at distinct locations in the plane of the touch panel and to produce distinct signals representative of the location of the touches on the plane of the touch panel for each of the multiple touches is disclosed.

The only issue is that description -- and the body itself -- covers multi-touch methods that had already been widely documented in research labs, other patents, and tech demos.  The crucial thing is that Apple's patent was on multi-touch on a capacitive display.   

Apple claims it "invented" multi-touch despite decades of prior art.
[Image Source: XDA Developers]

Similar issues have been raised about Apple's "slide to unlock" patents. Apple's legal approach has been matched by Samsung, which attempted to sue Apple using many standards patents it had promised to freely license under the "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) rules.  Samsung's interpretation of non-discriminatory apparently means not discriminating against anyone except Apple.

III. Why Settle?  Try, "$8B USD in Mutual Business"

Despite both companies' controversial tactics and bitter feud, they also share a great deal of business.  As one of the world's largest smartphone chipmakers, Samsung manufactures nearly all of Apple's smartphone and tablet system-on-a-chip designs. The companies reportedly have $8B USD worth of common business a year.

Apple A5
The brains of the iPhones are still made by Samsung, now at its new Austin, Texas factory.
[Image Source: iFixIt]

Thus there's a lot of pressure for Apple and Samsung to settle from a mutual interests perspective.  Then again, Oracle Corp. (ORCL) and Google Inc. (GOOG) failed to reach a settlement in a similar talks, and their case went to trial.

Apple chief executive Tim Cook and Samsung CEO Choi Gee-sung will both participate in the settlement talks.  If a settlement is not reached, a trial will begin this July.

Sources: Reuters, FOSS Patents

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Me thinks something else
By GotThumbs on 4/19/2012 10:59:00 AM , Rating: 4
Apple fan in the house.

Oh, and no one buys your "Again zero evidence for that. Apple only has a reputation as a 'patent troll' amongst a tiny minority of people who obsess about such things"

Only the uninformed would believe you on that one.

Nice try though. Steve would be proud of his dedicated helper.

RE: Me thinks something else
By amanojaku on 4/19/2012 11:06:55 AM , Rating: 3
We should check Tony's attic. FrankenSteve might be roaming around up there.

RE: Me thinks something else
By Cheesew1z69 on 4/19/2012 11:01:22 AM , Rating: 1
That's just his SJ blow up doll...

RE: Me thinks something else
By Tony Swash on 4/19/2012 1:03:42 PM , Rating: 2
Oh, and no one buys your "Again zero evidence for that. Apple only has a reputation as a 'patent troll' amongst a tiny minority of people who obsess about such things"

Only the uninformed would believe you on that one.

Fair enough. Now post some evidence that Apple has a widespread reputation as a patent troll. Any evidence.

RE: Me thinks something else
By nolisi on 4/19/2012 3:51:09 PM , Rating: 2
Did you miss the part where Apple files patents for already well established ideas/implementations and then sues based on them? Are you unaware of the fact that there are a good number of Apple users who are dissatisified with their legal approach? (I'm responding to you via iPad)

RE: Me thinks something else
By Trisped on 4/19/2012 8:20:45 PM , Rating: 2
Any evidence.
You said any.

Apple has been suing companies for the last year and a half based on patents of existing tech. They are going so far as to block sales of products by competitors resulting in major losses to their competitors, despite the fact that the competitors were willing to license the tech, even though the patents should not be enforceable.

How does this not constitute "... a person or company who ... enforces patents against one or more alleged infringers in a manner considered by the target or observers as unduly aggressive or opportunistic." /
The interesting twist that Apple brings is that they do not buy the patents, the patent existing ideas, then use it to sue those who use or came up with the idea.

If you require additional evidence then please read the DT posts on the issues.

"Well, there may be a reason why they call them 'Mac' trucks! Windows machines will not be trucks." -- Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki