Print 81 comment(s) - last by corduroygt.. on Apr 20 at 12:40 AM

  (Source: South Africa World Cup Blog)
"No one comes into the store and asks for a Windows phone." -- Euro executive

It's been a wild ride for Nokia Oyj.'s (HEL:NOK1V) first Windows Phone super-phone, the Lumia 900 LTE.  The last week has brought strong salesembarrassing bugs, and even a bit of respect from the American market.

I. Sampling the Hatorade

But Reuters reports that the increasing Nokia Lumia Windows Phone buzz is met with icy disdain across the pond in the UK.  One of Europe's top markets, UK carriers appear to be giving up on Nokia's Lumia, after hardly giving it a chance to shine.

An executive at a European telecom who had been selling the Lumia 710 and 800 complained, "No one comes into the store and asks for a Windows phone.  Nokia have given themselves a double challenge: to restore their credibility in terms of making hardware smartphones and succeed with the Microsoft Windows operating system, which lags in the market."

The executive is quoted as praising Windows Phone for its "tons of cool" features, but then throws the OS under the bus, stating, "If the Lumia with the same hardware came with Android in it and not Windows, it would be much easier to sell."

The curious thing with the European carriers is that they claim to be frustrated with Google Inc.'s (GOOG) Android legion and with the pricey iPhone from Apple, Inc. (AAPL) -- a device that may never turn a profit for carriers.  But when it comes to selling the Lumia's Reuters reports that the carriers are making hardly any effort.  Nokia's Windows Phones are tucked away in unseen corners and clerks peddle Apple iPhones and Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KS:005930) Galaxy phones on smartphone shoppers.

It's a tale of two continents.   In Europe, carriers are still eagerly ponying up the 600 to 700 euros (~$800 to $900 USD) to sell iPhones to customers, despite the fact that they may never turn a profit on the device.  Even Samsung phones are fetching an impressive 300 to 500 euros (~$400 and $650 USD) from the EU carriers.

Meanwhile, U.S. carriers appear to be adopting a different philosophy.  Encouraged by discounted handsets from Nokia and Microsoft Corp. (MSFT), the carriers are finally giving the platform a chance and pitching it to customers.  AT&T reports strong sales of the Lumia 900 LTE, which is prominently featured in nearly every U.S. store.  T-Mobile USA -- a subsidiary of Deutsche Telekom AG (ETR:DTE) reported that the Lumia 710, an entry-level Nokia Windows Phone, as among its most popular handsets.

II. Some Say Lower the Price; Others Say It's Hopeless

Richard Windsor, global technology specialist at investment bank Nomura predicted Nokia Lumia phones to take in 300 Euros on average.  Their actual haul is about 220 euros on average.  Yet, carriers seem to have no interest in these bargain devices in Europe and aren't even trying to sell them to customers.

The carriers seem to contradict each other.  One executive is quoted as saying, "If they could lower the price we think they could sell more. It might be worth making it a bit of a loss leader to get it out of the door. It's not rocket science."

Nokia Lumia 900 LTE
EU carriers are giving Nokia contradictory advice about how to bump sales, while reportedly putting little effort into trying to push the Lumia line. [Image Source: Nokia]

Another suggests that price is not enough.  They state, "We can open our stores to them and train our staff to sell the phones, but that's it.  Ultimately, Nokia and Windows are challengers and they either need to come to market with a really disruptive, innovative product or a huge marketing budget to create client demand. So far they have done neither."

The perplexing situation has to be particular frustrating for Nokia who is seeing accelerating U.S. sales, but has been largely scorned in its home continent.  If there's one thing illustrated by all the European criticism surrounding the Lumias, it's that while EU carriers may complain about Apple and Samsung's profit-seeking, they really don't mind all that much or have much desire to seek out and promote alternative options.

That's bad news for Nokia and anybody who isn't named Samsung or Apple.

Source: Reuters

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Expert?
By JasonMick on 4/17/2012 5:40:27 PM , Rating: 4
How do you figure that the iPhone may never turn a profit for the carriers? Since you are talking about Europe in the context of the article when you come out with a stupid claim like that why then link to an article (that was already a bunch of crap) about an American carrier?
Err, that's a well known fact cited by Bloomberg, the WSJ and other financial analysts well above my pay grade. Sorry if you were unaware of it.

Contrary to popular belief, phone service is not free. There's the cost of tower deployment, the cost of maintenance, the cost of powering the towers, the cost spectrum licensing, to name just a few.

On your average smartphone, carriers absolutely can and do turn a nice profit.

On the iPhone, it really depends on the carrier and the deals it made with Apple behind closed doors, but the WSJ and other sources have indicated in past pieces that the margins are small to nonexistent, in most cases.

In many cases it's a trade-off -- a small loss for a new subscriber.

The hope --as the above WSJ piece states, is that sales of the iPhone will eventually become profitable, over the life the multi-year deal.

RE: Expert?
By messele on 4/18/2012 1:59:42 AM , Rating: 2
You are still mixing quotes about US situations with an article concerning the UK. Quote from the WSJ all you want but until I see something about a UK carrier in there it's just not relevant.

And yeah, I am saying that unlimited data and calls does effectively come for free, it's infrastructure that costs (a lot), but don't forget the UK has a lot denser population that the US so deployment should not be quite so daunting and indeed th very expensive 3G setup costs occurred years ago now so that initial setup will have been recouped.

RE: Expert?
By ilt24 on 4/18/2012 11:00:47 AM , Rating: 1
He's using an article that speculates something he wants to be true.

In the U.S on a two year contract with the iPhone (at least the 16GB 4s) the carrier has to overcome a $18.75/m subsidy. With monthly plans (voice+data) going for $60 to over $100/month, I think there is plenty of room for carriers to make money.

RE: Expert?
By ncalipari on 4/18/2012 7:20:51 AM , Rating: 1
Err, that's a well known fact cited by Bloomberg, the WSJ and other financial analysts well above my pay grade. Sorry if you were unaware of it.

they are loosing money because there is a minimum commitment threshold.

Again: they might not make a margin on the sale of the handset, but they aim at long term profit. That's the business model of telecoms.

It's sad when a journalist manipulate the facts to make it look like he's right. It's even more sad when that journalist do it with arrogance.

"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki