Print 53 comment(s) - last by just4U.. on Apr 6 at 6:14 PM

F-35 taking off  (Source: Defense News)
Canada promises more due diligence on F-35 purchase

As the costs for the F-35 Lightning II program continue to grow, partner nations seem to be increasingly reconsidering their purchase of the aircraft. More than a few countries have said they would consider cutting back on the number of aircraft they purchase if the price continues to grow. Recently the lifetime cost of the F-35 program in the US was pegged at $1.45 trillion.
Some maintain that the costs of the fighter aren't growing as quickly as the numbers would lead people to believe because the U.S. government continues to change how they determine costs. Canada's auditor general accused the Canadian Defense Department of misleading lawmakers on the F-35 program costs this week.
Canadian auditor general Michael Ferguson asserts that military officials are so deeply committed to purchasing the F-35 that they did not "exercise due diligence" on the most expensive military procurement program in Canadian history.
“The department did not provide parliamentarians with complete cost information or fully inform decision makers about risks created by problems encountered in the (F-35) program,” he said.
“Only the most optimistic (cost) scenario was put forward,” and “key approvals (were) obtained after decisions were made.”
Canada still maintains that it intends to buy the 65 F-35 fighters, even though reports surfaced last month the Canada might cut back on orders. Canada intends to replace its fleet of CF-18 Hornets with the F-35. 
Canadian officials originally pegged the cost of the F-35 at $9 billion plus $7 billion for maintenance. Ferguson claims the true cost estimate is more in closer to $25 billion.
Ferguson also claims, “The department did not acknowledge that the decision to purchase the F-35 was well underway four years before it was officially announced.”
Ferguson isn't alone in his harsh criticism of the F-35 program in Canada; Democrat MP Christine Moore also criticizes the program. She said, "The government knew the F-35s were going to cost more than anticipated, but they intentionally hid it from parliament and the public." 
“This was an outrageous attempt to try and pull the wool over the eyes of Canadians.”
The Canadian government has pledged to freeze allocation for the fighter jet at the original $9 billion and turn the procurement process over to the Public Works ministry.

Source: Defense News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Misleading headline
By Uncle on 4/4/2012 1:51:10 PM , Rating: 2
"Canadian Government Once Again Lashes Out at F-35 Lightning II Program". Wasn't the government, it was the Auditor General." Ferguson found that many of the steps and documents used to support the government's 2010 decision to buy the F-35 were "of little consequence" because the key questions, including whether to run an open competition, were taken much earlier, "calling into question the integrity of the process." In other words the Cons broke their own rules by not tendering the work and the Cons even ignored the cost over runs, that any Cons minister could have Googled, that was coming from the states. I guess the Cons Minister of Defence Peter Mackay liked being wined and dined by the Lockheed Martin group.
Another example of the Cons selling out to the Americans. Even India rejected the F35 in favour of the French Rafale jets because of the cost overruns, single engine etc etc. The F35 couldn't even do what the Canadian Cons asked of it and that was to be able to patrol the Northern Artic. Talk about a sellout, reminds me of the Arrow project that the Cons scuttled in 1959, because the Americans had no plane like it. Imagine a single engine F 35 and you blow a fuel line, kiss the plane goodbye.

RE: Misleading headline
By just4U on 4/6/2012 6:14:40 PM , Rating: 2
Your post is reminicent of what you might see in the Star or G&M.. very onesided and biased.

"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki