backtop


Print 54 comment(s) - last by croc.. on Apr 6 at 8:40 AM


  (Source: badjonni via flickr)
Apparently #winning is not enough -- complaints could come back to bite Apple, provide ammo for Android rivals

Apple, Inc. (AAPL) supporters hailed Chicago, Illinois Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals  Judge Richard Posner's ruling as a landmark in the gadgetmaker's case against new Google Inc. (GOOG) almost-subsidiary (pending Chinese approval) and top Android phonemaker, Motorola Mobility.  

Not only did uphold most of Apple's claim construction regarding Apple's asserted intellectual property rights, U.S. Patent No. 7,479,949 -- the infamous "multi-touch patent" -- it also admonished Motorola's counterarguments.  Supporters said that the strong victory could clear the way for something even they weren't sure if they were comfortable with -- a complete ban of America's current top smartphone platform, Android.

So how did Apple respond to this wonderful legal gift that Judge Posner handed it?

Apparently "complained" would be the proper term.  Astoundingly Apple filed a motion challenging some aspects of the Judge's Claim Construction, which it felt might weaken its "thermonuclear" quest to destroy all of the top Android phonemakers' sales.

But much like Napoleon's bold invasion of Moscow, followed by a ruinous retreat, Apple may have made a fatal miscalculation in angering Judge Posner who once appeared to be on its side.  Judge Posner called Apple's filing "troubling" and writes [PDF]:

Apple presumably spent a nontrivial amount of time drafting its order, and now I have done the same in responding to it. Yet it seems that Apple brought about this expenditure of scarce resources without first making a careful reading of the page or so of my order against which this motion is launched. Such inconsiderate sloppiness is unprofessional and unacceptable.

Judge Posner
Judge Posner's tone with Apple shifted dramatically. [Image Source: Appellate Lawyers Assoc.]

Given Judge Posner's strong reputation in U.S. Federal legal circles, his criticism of Apple's legal staff as "unprofessional" is very "troubling" for the Cupertino gadgetmaker, to borrow his term.  That criticism goes well beyond his harshest words to Motorola's lawyers to date.

Again, it's somewhat baffling why Apple would turn around and burn itself on the eve of its greatest triumph in U.S. Federal Court.  However, some grateful Motorola lawyers are surely thanking the heavens for this inexplicable turn of events.

An important note is that Motorola started the lawsuits with an Oct. 2010 filing against Apple claiming infringement of 18 patents.  However, given that Apple had just filed a lawsuit against HTC Corp. (TPE:2498) and had admittedly threatened both Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KS:005930) and Motorola with litigation, it appears this may have been a "preemptive strike".  Sure enough, Apple sued Motorola later that month.  So far Apple has done better in the U.S., though Motorola did get several key patents invalidated.

A non-biased observer could argue that Apple started the lawsuit war with Android, but Samsung and Motorola escalated it with new suits, and a host of international filings.  Likewise, such an observer might point out that a piece of the culpability lies with Windows Phone maker Nokia Oyj. (HEL:NOK1V) who kicked off the lawsuit wars in 2009, suing Apple over 10 patents and filing a complaint with the U.S. International Trade Commission seeking to ban iPhone imports from their manufacturing location in China.  That ban request was the first of its kind and would be echoed in later ITC filings by Apple and its Android rivals.  Wikipedia maintains an excellent timeline of the lawsuit wars.

Source: SBNation



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Ready to see Apple die a painful death.
By elleehswon on 4/5/2012 10:43:59 AM , Rating: 2
Apparenly you've never checked the specs on a new macbook pro. oooh look, 2 year old hardware, and only $3000!! wow, this is way better than that Asus G74 that'll eat it alive for half the cost.

Why does the macbook pro suck? Easy answer: 65w Power supply. How do you expect to run that cpu full bore, power the gpu under load, ram, HDD, display, and sound? Ooooh, you just drain the battery while it's plugged in because the hardware that your precious apple gave you, sucks.

Run crysis on a macbook pro and see how much fun you have dialing down the graphics because your precious machine is throwing up all over itself.

Oh, it's cute that you have to pay an extra 35 bucks to be able to use HDMI.. I'm pretty sure most other laptop manufacturers just include the freakin' port.

while we're at it, lets cover where apple stands in the pack as far as what percentage of macbooks require warranty work? If you think they're at the top with the lowest percentage, i have some bad news for you. They're behind asus, sony, and toshiba.

Apple's smartphones are technologically behind, always have been, and always will be as long as they don't have to compete with the other manufacturers on account of their PR.

The only thing keeping apple afloat, as usual, is PR. They are the best(tech) at creating a desire in the customer to buy their product.

While we're at it, tony, where would apple be without microsoft bailing them about a couple years back?

Great tech company though. *golfclap*


RE: Ready to see Apple die a painful death.
By Tony Swash on 4/5/12, Rating: 0
By Cheesew1z69 on 4/5/2012 12:49:44 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
you will remain clueless and out of touch with reality
Coming from you...LOLOLOLOL...


By elleehswon on 4/5/2012 3:27:18 PM , Rating: 2
It is down to PR, Tony. You build a product that is technologically inferior, but catches people's eye, and create an environment of want for that product.

yea, buying the experience rhetoric, right? Sounds like you're the sucker. Oooh, well i can waste my time doing stupid little gestures that take 3x as long as hitting a hot key.

Hell, i can get the same free experience from a ubuntu 11.10 install and i can throw that on any machine i want!


"When an individual makes a copy of a song for himself, I suppose we can say he stole a song." -- Sony BMG attorney Jennifer Pariser














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki