Print 18 comment(s) - last by InsaneScientis.. on Apr 6 at 5:05 PM

  (Source: PressWire)
The next step in this process is typically a billion dollar fine

It has been a pretty bad week for new Google Inc. (GOOGsubsidiary and top Android phonemaker Motorola Mobility.  On Monday it learned that a senior U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals judge had ruled that Apple essentially has an exclusive patent on any functional mobile touch device (any device with error checking or "heuristics", as Apple calls it) until 2028.  The ruling clears the way for Apple to potentially ban all Motorola U.S. handset sales.

Now to add insult to injury, the European Union has announced that it is opening proceedings against Motorola for FRAND patent abuse, following an initial probe phase. Past proceedings against Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Intel Corp. (INTC) have resulted in billion dollar fines.

The EU writes:

Following complaints by Apple and Microsoft, the Commission will investigate, in particular, whether by seeking and enforcing injunctions against Apple's and Microsoft's flagship products such as iPhone, iPad, Windows and Xbox on the basis of patents it had declared essential to produce standard-compliant products, Motorola has failed to honour its irrevocable commitments made to standard setting organisations. In these commitments, Motorola engaged to license those standard-essential patents on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The Commission will examine whether Motorola's behaviour amounts to an abuse of a dominant market position prohibited by Article 102 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU).

Motorola is between a rock and a hard place here.  On the one hand some nations -- including the U.S. -- are about ready to ban its handsets thanks to very vague and broad interface patents granted to Apple.  On the other hand, Motorola's patent library is largely tied up in mobile standards -- patents that have mandatory licensing under the "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND).

Motorola hq
It's been a very bad week for Android phonemaker Motorola. [Image Source: Jack Agency]

Motorola gambled and sued Apple using its FRAND IP anyways; Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KS:005930) -- another top Android phonemaker -- made a similar move.  While one might think these suits to be reasonable, on the premise that that it's impossible to have "fair" and "reasonable" licensing with a company that's trying to remove you from the market with punitive patent litigation, the EU court system does not see it that way.

Both Microsoft (also sued by Motorola Mobility) and Apple filed EU complaints against Motorola over alleged FRAND abuse.  Microsoft's attorneys accused Motorola of asking for 1,125 times the industry standard for its video codec patents.

Apple alone filed a similar allegation against Samsung (Samsung agreed to license Microsoft's patents).  The EU has not announced yet whether it will open formal proceedings against Samsung.

But to all appearances the worst-case scenario just became a whole lot worse for Android.  While it still has legal options to avoid such a doomsday scenario, the worst case is it could see itself banned from sale in the U.S., while two of the top Android phonemakers are forced by the EU to pay billion dollar fines.

This is a very wild and chaotic time in the market (and intellectual property).  It should be interesting, if a bit disturbing, to see how this all plays out.

Source: EU [press release]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: You forgot to talk about Microsoft
By Tony Swash on 4/3/2012 11:01:38 AM , Rating: -1
It's like I don't believe in murder, but I can UNDERSTAND why someone whose child is raped by a pervert might kill that person out of vengeance.

Comparing a company trying to stop other companies from copying its patented designs (even if you think those patents are invalid) to a child rapist is absurd and offensive.

But at least it's not looking to completely destroy the market and harm consumers with a ban.

Neither is Apple. What evidence do you have that Apple's strategic aim is to completely destroy the market?

I expect the idealism to wear off quickly and for FRAND/standards development to be abandoned, should this situation wear on.

What on earth makes you think that FRAND licensing is based on idealism? Companies voluntarily offer their patents for FRAND licensing because they calculate that if their patents are adopted as part of an industry standard then they will make a lot of money and they know their patents will never be accepted by their competitors unless they are offered with precisely the guarantee that FRAND once had that they would not be abused.

It is the abuse of FRAND patents by Motorola and Samsung which will damage the market the most.

Remember: Motorola sued Apple first.

RE: You forgot to talk about Microsoft
By fredgiblet on 4/3/2012 4:28:07 PM , Rating: 3
So trying to scare off the richest company in the world is going to harm the market more than try to completely destroy competition?

You are delusional.

RE: You forgot to talk about Microsoft
By Pirks on 4/3/2012 4:40:41 PM , Rating: 2
It's you who are delusional, not Tony. If Apple were really destroying competition, they'd attack MS and Windows Phone as well, but they did not. So stop lying.

By sprockkets on 4/3/2012 8:36:02 PM , Rating: 2
We'll see how that plays out if WP7/8 gains any significant market share. They never sued palm and of course had no need to.

"If you can find a PS3 anywhere in North America that's been on shelves for more than five minutes, I'll give you 1,200 bucks for it." -- SCEA President Jack Tretton

Most Popular ArticlesTop 5 Smart Watches
July 21, 2016, 11:48 PM
Free Windows 10 offer ends July 29th, 2016: 10 Reasons to Upgrade Immediately
July 22, 2016, 9:19 PM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki