Print 28 comment(s) - last by ianweck.. on Mar 31 at 2:21 AM

Tim Cook visits a Foxconn factory in China  (Source:
The FLA is working to fix these issues with reduced overtime, better compensation and elected employee representatives

Apple has been in some hot water since January when The New York Times published an article about the unfair treatment of workers in the company's suppliers' factories in China, but Apple's voluntary submission to the Fair Labor Association's (FLA) rigorous inspections is beginning to turn the situation around.

The FLA recently investigated three different Foxconn factories in China where Apple products are made. After spending 3,000 staff hours watching 35,000 workers, the FLA found that there were indeed some violations that needed to be addressed. Among those violations were overtime, pay and health-related issues.

The FLA discovered that Foxconn employees were working beyond the Chinese legal limits of 40 hours per week and 36 hours maximum overtime per month over the last year. Many employees worked over 60 hours per week (especially during peak production periods), and worked more than seven days in a row without the 24 hours off that is required.

Both Apple and Foxconn have agreed to comply with the FLA's changes, which will be to decrease working hours to 49 per week (including overtime) and reducing monthly overtime hours from 80 to 36. Also, overtime payment, which is typically paid in 30-minute increments, will change for the better. Traditionally, a worker had to work 30 minutes for overtime, but if they worked 29 minutes, they wouldn't receive the overtime payment. IF they worked 59 minutes, they only received 30 minutes of overtime payment. Workers will now be compensated for the time they work, not just in 30-minute increments.

For those employees that depend on the income that came from extended overtime, Foxconn will offer a compensation package to prevent workers from losing income due to decreased overtime.

Aside from overtime, 64 percent of Foxconn workers said their general pay did not meet basic needs, such as the cost of living in their respective cities. The FLA is now investigating if that is the case.

The FLA also interviewed employees about their working conditions, and 43 percent said they have witnessed or experienced an accident. Accidents ranged from minor injuries to factory vehicle accidents, and safety issues like missing permits and blocked exits were taken care of during the investigation. The FLA also requires supervisors and workers to report all injuries now; not just those that end in a production stoppage.

In addition, the FLA found that workers were being represented strictly by management, but changed this by electing worker representatives to speak for the others.

"If implemented, these commitments will significantly improve the lives of more than 1.2 million Foxconn employees and set a new standard for Chinese factories," said Auret van Heerden, FLA president and CEO.

The investigation came after Apple voluntarily joined the FLA, following the negative NYT report that cited poor working conditions for Foxconn employees who made Apple products. Apple CEO Tim Cook was outraged by the NYT report, which accused his company of not caring about its supplier's employees overseas.

After joining the FLA, van Heerden initially reported in February that Apple's Foxconn plants were not so bad after all. In fact, he said they were "first class," and that the workers were just bored with the monotony of their jobs, which led to the accidents in the factories. Now, it seems the opposite is true and the workers were in fact pushed to their limits.

However, Apple has made a valid effort to check out the situation in China. Just this week, Cook visited its latest iPhone factory in Zhengzhou, China, where 120,000 employees work.

Apple and Foxconn agreed to meet FLA working standards/Chinese legal limits by July 2013.

Source: Fair Labor Association

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Lies.
By Tony Swash on 3/30/2012 1:44:02 PM , Rating: 0
On the issue of comparative suicide rates and the significance of the Foxconn suicides one can link to this sort of data!/nicepaul/status/16379729630...

but it hardly seems worth it as we all know that referencing facts is not going to change anything. The iPhobes will play this one up even though they don't care a jot about workers rights or workers conditions in China (who makes the iPhobes gadgets?) because all they want is something new to attack Apple with. Which is what makes it so amusing that blinded by their phobia they are stumbling into Apple's trap. Here is how:

Apple has the best managed and most efficient supply chain of any major electronic manufacturer. Using it's vast purchasing power, it's huge pile of cash and it's vastly simplified range of SKUs (Stock Keeping Units) it can plan and shape it's supply chain to suit, guaranteeing the best price, the most reliable supply, the earliest delivery of new technologies and the highest quality. Apple's supply chain is a key reason for it's astonishing profitability and it means that it can retain the quality it wants in it's products and still squeeze the prices of it's products down to the point where in order to compete other companies have to squeeze their margins often to vanishing point.

So if there is any company that can invest in, stretch and restructure it's supply chain it's Apple. Now in response to the media stories about labour conditions Apple can embark on a huge public reform process of it's supply chain, forcing up wages, improving conditions and above all making the whole chain transparent and open to external and public scrutiny. Apple's suppliers will hate it but what can they do, Apple is the biggest game in town.

Once the reforms are really making a difference, which they already are, Apple can tout the excellence of the conditions in it's supply chain as another reason for the concerned consumer to buy Apple. Apple will be really punt this topic, expect to see lots of stuff about how great their supply chain is in the company's marketing materials.

And then Apple will say 'compare us to our competitors'.

Because the truth of the matter, the thing the iPhobics wallowing in a chance to get at Apple have brushed under the carpet, is that the conditions in the supply chain of all of Apple's competitors are at least as bad as that in Apple's and often worse and they can't afford public scrutiny of their supply chains. Apple's competitors don't have the purchasing clout or the margins or the flexibility in their supply chain to match what Apple can do. The costs of reforming the supply chain and the conditions of the workers in it will make a small dent in a hugely healthy Apple bottom line and a big dent in the already anaemic profits of it's competitors.

This yet another win win for Apple. Delivered and packaged with the help of those that hate Apple the most. Beautiful.

RE: Lies.
By bupkus on 3/30/2012 6:20:06 PM , Rating: 2
Right in the middle of reading this I fell asleep and had the most confusing dream ever.

RE: Lies.
By ianweck on 3/31/2012 2:19:51 AM , Rating: 2
Holy Ish! It's Tony!

"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki