Print 28 comment(s) - last by ianweck.. on Mar 31 at 2:21 AM

Tim Cook visits a Foxconn factory in China  (Source:
The FLA is working to fix these issues with reduced overtime, better compensation and elected employee representatives

Apple has been in some hot water since January when The New York Times published an article about the unfair treatment of workers in the company's suppliers' factories in China, but Apple's voluntary submission to the Fair Labor Association's (FLA) rigorous inspections is beginning to turn the situation around.

The FLA recently investigated three different Foxconn factories in China where Apple products are made. After spending 3,000 staff hours watching 35,000 workers, the FLA found that there were indeed some violations that needed to be addressed. Among those violations were overtime, pay and health-related issues.

The FLA discovered that Foxconn employees were working beyond the Chinese legal limits of 40 hours per week and 36 hours maximum overtime per month over the last year. Many employees worked over 60 hours per week (especially during peak production periods), and worked more than seven days in a row without the 24 hours off that is required.

Both Apple and Foxconn have agreed to comply with the FLA's changes, which will be to decrease working hours to 49 per week (including overtime) and reducing monthly overtime hours from 80 to 36. Also, overtime payment, which is typically paid in 30-minute increments, will change for the better. Traditionally, a worker had to work 30 minutes for overtime, but if they worked 29 minutes, they wouldn't receive the overtime payment. IF they worked 59 minutes, they only received 30 minutes of overtime payment. Workers will now be compensated for the time they work, not just in 30-minute increments.

For those employees that depend on the income that came from extended overtime, Foxconn will offer a compensation package to prevent workers from losing income due to decreased overtime.

Aside from overtime, 64 percent of Foxconn workers said their general pay did not meet basic needs, such as the cost of living in their respective cities. The FLA is now investigating if that is the case.

The FLA also interviewed employees about their working conditions, and 43 percent said they have witnessed or experienced an accident. Accidents ranged from minor injuries to factory vehicle accidents, and safety issues like missing permits and blocked exits were taken care of during the investigation. The FLA also requires supervisors and workers to report all injuries now; not just those that end in a production stoppage.

In addition, the FLA found that workers were being represented strictly by management, but changed this by electing worker representatives to speak for the others.

"If implemented, these commitments will significantly improve the lives of more than 1.2 million Foxconn employees and set a new standard for Chinese factories," said Auret van Heerden, FLA president and CEO.

The investigation came after Apple voluntarily joined the FLA, following the negative NYT report that cited poor working conditions for Foxconn employees who made Apple products. Apple CEO Tim Cook was outraged by the NYT report, which accused his company of not caring about its supplier's employees overseas.

After joining the FLA, van Heerden initially reported in February that Apple's Foxconn plants were not so bad after all. In fact, he said they were "first class," and that the workers were just bored with the monotony of their jobs, which led to the accidents in the factories. Now, it seems the opposite is true and the workers were in fact pushed to their limits.

However, Apple has made a valid effort to check out the situation in China. Just this week, Cook visited its latest iPhone factory in Zhengzhou, China, where 120,000 employees work.

Apple and Foxconn agreed to meet FLA working standards/Chinese legal limits by July 2013.

Source: Fair Labor Association

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Lies.
By A11 on 3/30/2012 10:59:13 AM , Rating: -1
Nice try but there's such a thing as a burden of proof and seeing how you're the one claiming there is a suicide issue it's on you, so why don't you go ahead and share the research I'm sure you've done to come to this conclusion with the rest of us?

Until you post some more relevant figures I'll stick to what I know, and that is the Foxconn suicide rate seems to be pretty low to me.

RE: Lies.
By Motoman on 3/30/2012 11:08:13 AM , Rating: 4
You can stick your head in the sand, like all Macolytes do, and insist that reality isn't happening. However, you *know* you're intentionally misrepresenting a statistic, and that's not my problem - it's yours.

RE: Lies.
By A11 on 3/30/12, Rating: -1
RE: Lies.
By ShaolinSoccer on 3/30/2012 12:30:37 PM , Rating: 2
You can start at the bottom of this page

RE: Lies.
By Motoman on 3/30/2012 12:51:56 PM , Rating: 4
You're the one making the unusual claim without backing it up...and deftly trying to switch that around and saying I'm making the unusual claim.

Saying that there are less suicides amongst a group of people employed in a high tech industry than amongst a general population consisting of vast amounts of poverty-stricken and generally oppressed people is...saying nothing at all. Chalk that up to "duh."

*You* are claiming that the suicide rate at the Apple Foxconn facility is unremarkable based on that notion - I pointed out that the "fact" you've provided is worthless, and asked you to provide a worthwhile fact instead. Which, specifically, would be a comparison of the Foxconn Apple factory vs. other similar factories.

Instead of providing an actual, valid fact, you instead try to insinuate that I'm the one upon whom the burden of proof rests. But that's not the case - *you* are making the unusual claim that needs to be proven, and *you* have already been called out for providing deliberately misleading data. So *you* are the one who needs to put up, or shut up. Personally, I'd suggest the "shut up" part...but as with all Macolytes, you're just not all that likely to do something that rational.You're the one making the unusual claim without backing it up...and deftly trying to switch that around and saying I'm making the unusual claim.

Saying that there are less suicides amongst a group of people employed in a high tech industry than amongst a general population consisting of vast amounts of poverty-stricken and generally oppressed people is...saying nothing at all. Chalk that up to

RE: Lies.
By Tony Swash on 3/30/12, Rating: 0
RE: Lies.
By bupkus on 3/30/2012 6:20:06 PM , Rating: 2
Right in the middle of reading this I fell asleep and had the most confusing dream ever.

RE: Lies.
By ianweck on 3/31/2012 2:19:51 AM , Rating: 2
Holy Ish! It's Tony!

RE: Lies.
By A11 on 3/30/2012 1:38:35 PM , Rating: 2
That's funny, I'm claiming everything is within the ordinary and you're claiming it isn't and yet I'm making the unusual claim?
Douglas Adams would like a word with you regarding burden of proof.

Anyway with all the media coverage this has had you may want to stop for a second there and think about why it is you can't produce a single document showing Foxconn has a higher than expected suicide rate before you go on.

RE: Lies.
By Pirks on 3/30/2012 3:17:22 PM , Rating: 1
Motoman is a very well known anti-Apple troll here, I've run through exactly same arguments with him many times before. It's always "you Macolyte dipsh1t go suck SJ dick" from him and nothing else. Believe me, you're wasting your time trying to hit him with a dose of reality, he's forever stuck in his little insulated bubble. Just forget it.

RE: Lies.
By geddarkstorm on 3/30/2012 6:01:31 PM , Rating: 2
Everything is not within the ordinary. You do understand the concept of sub populations and sampling pools for statistics, right?

RE: Lies.
By bupkus on 3/30/2012 6:24:05 PM , Rating: 2
higher than expected suicide rate
and this means what?

"Can anyone tell me what MobileMe is supposed to do?... So why the f*** doesn't it do that?" -- Steve Jobs

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki