Print 45 comment(s) - last by todd omy.. on Mar 18 at 8:29 AM

Canada reserves the right to back out of F-35

The cost overruns on the F-35 project are legendary and continue to mount. The costs of the F-35 program are spiraling at such a fast rate that many partner nations are considering canceling orders or significantly reducing purchase plans.
The latest partner nation considering reducing the order in place for the F-35 is Canada. The Canadian government has admitted that it might not complete the purchase of F-35s. The United States has long said that if partner countries cancel orders or reduce orders, the cost of the jet will spiral for all nations.
Canada originally agreed to purchase $9 billion worth of F-35 fighters for the Royal Canadian Air Force. Canada intends to replace its aging CF-18 jets with the F-35.
“The… decision has not been made as to whether or not we are actually going to purchase, buy, acquire the F-35,” said Julian Fantino, associate defense minister.
“We have not as yet discounted, the possibility of course, of backing out of any of the program. None of the partners have. We are not,” he told the Commons Defence Committee Tuesday.

A group of Lockheed F-35B Lightning II fighters [Source: Lockheed Martin]
Fantino's comments are marked contrast to other comments offered by Canadian officials in the past who were staunch advocates of the F-35. In the past, Canadian government officials have gone so far as to accuse people who didn't support the F-35 of not supporting the armed forces.
The first indication of trouble in Canada came last month when Defense Minister Peter MacKay refused to confirm how many F-35's Canada would buy.
However, a spokesman for the Canadian Defense Ministry press McClusky told the Star-Telegram in an email, "Our position has not changed. We remain committed to the Joint Strike Fighter Program. A budget has been allocated. A contract has not been signed. We will make sure that the Air Force has aircraft necessary to do the job we ask of them."
The Pentagon has considered reducing the production rate of the F-35 to an even slower rate to allow more time to fix issues discovered in flight testing.

Sources: Star-Telegram, The Star

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Of Course
By dark matter on 3/14/2012 4:10:07 PM , Rating: 0
Quit being the world police then, and the world would be a safer place for all.

RE: Of Course
By Quadrillity on 3/14/2012 4:21:00 PM , Rating: 2
If you missed the point of my post, then I should clarify: I think we should heed the strong advice of our first president about entangling foreign affairs (meaning anything that doesn't directly threaten our freedom and sovereignty).

By the way, how would the world be a safer place? I'm not saying it would or wouldn't, but what made you come to that conclusion?

RE: Of Course
By KCjoker on 3/15/2012 6:15:53 PM , Rating: 1
I wish we would...but then when there's a world crisis guess who they turn to for help? Take Haiti for example, sure other countries helped but the USA did the majority of the work/cost.

RE: Of Course
By vXv on 3/17/2012 5:34:52 PM , Rating: 3
Yeah but this didn't require any fighters (or even a military really).

"My sex life is pretty good" -- Steve Jobs' random musings during the 2010 D8 conference

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki