Print 47 comment(s) - last by Plugers.. on Mar 12 at 8:32 PM

Comcast has its own streaming service called Streampix

It looks as if Netflix's plans to join forces with cable companies may be foiled already, as Comcast refuses to offer Netflix on its Xfinity TV service.

Earlier this month, Netflix CEO Reed Hastings said it was likely that his video streaming service would end up doing business with cable service providers in the future. He saw this as a smart move, considering the fact that he recognizes HBO's Go on-demand as Netflix's top competitor. Moving in to the cable business would offer cable providers an alternative to HBO Go and put Netflix higher in the ranks.

"It's not in the short term, but it's the natural direction for us in the long term," said Hastings. "Many [cable service providers] would like to have a competitor to HBO, and they would bid us off of HBO."

However, Comcast has already thrown a wrench in Netflix's plans. According to Alana Davis, a Comcast spokeswoman, the cable operator has no intention of working with Netflix or offering it as an on-demand service.

"We have no plans to offer access to Netflix to our customers through our Xfinity TV service, no matter what device," said Davis.

This is a pretty big blow to Netflix, considering Comcast is the country's largest cable company with 22.3 million Xfinity subscribers. Also, Comcast already offers a service similar to Netflix called Streampix, which eliminates the need for Netflix's service. Comcast's service is also $4.99 per month as part of a cable package while Netflix's service starts at $7.99 per month.

Netflix is still doing okay for itself for now after recovering from a rocky 2011, which entailed troubles like price hikes and angry customers leaving the service, but Netflix may have to rethink its next move since Comcast let it down like a bad first date.

Source: The New York Times

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Comcast sucks!
By MrBlastman on 3/9/2012 1:19:43 PM , Rating: 2
Well the deal I was looking at would be Direct TV for Television and AT&T for internet and voice. Apparently they are under a partnership of some sorts. Ugh, all this leaves a nasty taste in my mouth.

RE: Comcast sucks!
By tng on 3/9/2012 1:58:59 PM , Rating: 2
Blast, I can sympathize with you. I got Comcrap in 97 with just basic cable and it was $40/month. By the time we dropped them, it was $80.

The breaking point was when they disabled basic cable and insisted that we had to go digital, 1 converter box was free, the second and third we would have to rent. The move also made my 2 Sony HD DVRs useless as well and it was even more to rent a DVR from them, which was really not any improvement over my Sony boxes.

I have moved on to Direct TV and have not looked back. I am still paying probably as much as I would be with Comcrap, but the service is much better so far.

RE: Comcast sucks!
By bobsmith1492 on 3/9/2012 7:46:38 PM , Rating: 2
I've been using ATT DSL for internet only for a couple of years now. I'm getting level 2 speed or something, so it's only 1.5M down / 384K up, but it's reliable and fairly cheap at $35 and does all I need. I'd recommend it if you're not into too much Netflix. Youtube is too slow though to use... or ATT throttles or something.

One's experience probably depends on one's connection though, the cable/phone boxes and line quality.

"Spreading the rumors, it's very easy because the people who write about Apple want that story, and you can claim its credible because you spoke to someone at Apple." -- Investment guru Jim Cramer

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki