backtop


Print 88 comment(s) - last by testerguy.. on Mar 15 at 10:46 AM

Benchmarks or GTFO!

Yesterday when Apple unveiled the new iPad, the crew from Cupertino took some time to brag about its new A5X processor in comparison to NVIDIA’s Tegra 3. Apple certainly isn't widely known for offering up benchmarks on its own, so we'll likely have to wait until iPads land in the hands of reviewers and geeks around the web.
 
Apple used the iPad unveiling to boast that the A5X chip inside the new iPad is two times faster than A5, and four times more powerful in graphics performance than the Tegra 3.
 
 
NVIDIA isn't buying those claims without proof. The graphics company wants to know how Apple came by that number. Ken Brown, a spokesman for NVIDIA, stated, "[It was] certainly flattering " for Apple to compare its newest chip to their part.
 
Brown continued, “We don’t have the benchmark information. We have to understand what the application was that was used. Was it one or a variety of applications? What drivers were used? There are so many issues to get into with benchmark.”
 
Anyone that follows tech knows benchmarks are often handpicked to favor one particular brand over another when it comes to claims such as these. So it should be interesting to see if the new iPad’s performance lives up to the claims.

Source: ZDNet



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Geez...
By EnzoFX on 3/8/2012 2:44:43 PM , Rating: 0
Some people here just can't seem to believe that apple has the better GPU. They must hold the mighty Tegra3 in such high esteem...

It's pretty simple. It will be significantly faster than Tegra 3, considering the iPad 2's GPU already is, how is that not something you can naturally infer? As for taking their statement literally of 4X the performance, you should just know better, you so called Tech reader. Companies always give you their best possible scenario. Now get over it.




RE: Geez...
By Guspaz on 3/8/2012 5:43:30 PM , Rating: 2
I'm not sure anybody else has even shipped anything as fast as the PowerVR SGX543MP2 yet either. Sony is shipping the same GPU a the new iPad in the PS Vita, but that's not a smartphone or tablet.

I think it's a power drain thing. Anybody else could license them, but other companies may be having trouble keeping the battery life under control. There may be a few advantages that Apple has that let them get away with it. They have more aggressive power management than Android, largely as a function of keeping tighter control of the OS, they have more sophisticated manufacturing techniques that allow them to shave off weight (and use larger batteries), etc. A lot of this stuff is just a simple result of them being more vertically integrated and keeping more control than the competition.


RE: Geez...
By TakinYourPoints on 3/8/2012 7:18:39 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Some people here just can't seem to believe that apple has the better GPU. They must hold the mighty Tegra3 in such high esteem...


I suspect it is less holding the Tegra 3 in such high esteem and more about irrational Apple hatred. Benchmarks have already shown that the A5 was much faster than the Tegra 3, so it follows that the updated PowerVR GPU in the A5X will be even faster.

And forget pride, it needs to be faster given the number of pixels it is pushing on that display. The iPad has nearly as many pixels as my 27" 2560x1440 desktop monitor, any less GPU performance and it wouldn't be very smooth at all.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki