backtop


Print 61 comment(s) - last by fteoath64.. on Mar 11 at 8:19 AM


  (Source: Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer/Warner Bros.)
Scanner couldn't even perform as well as a basic metal detector, but it's good at looking at your genitals

Body scanners are a controversial tool that's currently being installed at airports worldwide -- particularly in the U.S., where the government has paid contractors such as Rapiscan and Brijot hundreds of millions of dollars to deploy over 500 of the devices.  In the U.S. the deployment has reportedly been pushed by illicit financial ties, such as former U.S. Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) chief Michael Chertoff's financial relationship with Rapiscan, who paid off the chief for his "consulting services."

Michael Chertoff
Ex-DHS chief Michael Chertoff accepted payments from Rapiscan, even as he was promoting paying the contractor millions of dollars in body scanner contracts. [Image Source: DHS]

Meanwhile, there have been reports of U.S. Transportation Safety Administration (TSA) officials abusing the devices to make fun of peoples' genitals.  And reports also indicate health risks and the possibility that the DHS may be storing nudes scans of people for later reference.

But the most damning piece of evidence against the scanners yet may have just landed, delivered by college-educated engineer Jonathan Corbett, who runs the blog "TSA Out of Our Pants".

Mr. Corbett has identified a weakness in the device, which essentially renders them useless.  He noticed that both the older backscatter machines and the new millimeter wave scanners, chose the color of spotted solid objects as identitical to the background, allowing techs to spot items hidden against the body (colorized as white), such as weapons or bomb-making chemicals.  So he decided to see what happened if a secret pocket was stitched into a shirt, well off of the body.

Body scanner images
Body scanners rely solely on contrast -- making them useless if the weapon or bomb-making supply is held off the body, tests have shown. [Image Source: TSA]

He tested the theory using a metal case stored inside a secret pocket.  Had he put the object in his chest pocket, it would have been spotted in the scans and he would almost certainly have been detained. But by using the secret side pocket, which was not contrasted in the image against his body, he eluded both the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport's backscatter machine and the Cleveland-Hopkins International Airport's newest millimeter wave machine.

He comments to top UK news site Mail Online, "While I carried the metal case empty, it could easily have been filled with razor blades, explosives, or one of Charlie Sheen’s infamous seven gram rocks of cocaine.  With a bigger pocket, perhaps sewn on the inside of the shirt, even a firearm could get through."

The metal case would have been detected by the old security checkpoint of a decade ago, as it had metal-detectors.  However, the new checkpoints largely have no built-in metal detection of on-person objects, relying solely on full-body scanners and occasional pat-downs (which Mr. Corbett did not receive).

Cleverly, Mr. Corbett video-taped his clean scan, by putting his camera, running, on the conveyor belt and allowing it to travel through luggage X-Ray scan, spotting him on his way out.

Jonathan Corbett
Jonathan Corbett -- an engineer-turned blogger -- has presented compelling evidence that body scanners decrease security and are ineffective at fighting terrorism.  He is suing the TSA
[Image Source: Jonathan Corbett/Mail Online]

"Now, I'm sure the TSA will accuse me of aiding the terrorists by releasing this video, but it's beyond belief that the terrorists haven't already figured this out and are already plotting to use this against us.  It’s also beyond belief that the TSA did not already know everything I just told you, and arrogantly decided to disregard our safety. The nude body scanner program is nothing but a giant fraud."

In the past it was shown that less-dense objects like plastic guns or low-density explosives could be missed in backscatter images.  However, this is the first compelling proof that millimeter wave designs are also useless -- another prop in the government's expensive game of "security theater" -- a game that has been potentially motivated by financial corruption.

Mr. Corbett recalls thinking when he first envisioned the work-around, "It can't possibly be that easy to beat the TSA’s billion dollar fleet of nude body scanners, right? The TSA can't be that stupid, can they?"

Summarizing his findings, he comments, "Unfortunately, they can, and they are."

Airport travellers
An engineer has offered evidence that the TSA and DHS have recklessly endangered hundreds of thousands of Americans by promoting a false illusion of security with body scanners.
[Image Source: Corbis]

The TSA has refused to comment on these developments.

Video of the incident can be found here:



Google Inc.'s (GOOG) YouTube (the host) has rated this video 18+ as per its "Community Guidelines", although it does not contain any profanity or any ostensibly inappropriate content.

Other threats to the effectiveness of the devices are also looming.  Recently, terrorists in Saudi Arabia have resorted to increasingly complex methods for disguising improvised explosive devices, such as inserting bombs in their rectal cavities [1][2]. The question becomes whether the TSA will go as far as ordering "cavity searches" of travellers, in addition to genital-region pat downs of everyone from children to the elderly.

The embarassment for the TSA and DHS -- and the Bush and Obama administrations that supported the scanner rollout -- is unlikely to fade any time soon, though.  Mr. Corbett has taken the bold move of suing [PDF] the TSA for the scanner rollout, which he complains was a waste of money that decreased security versus traditional metal detectors and pat-downs.

Sources: TSA Out of Our Pants [press release], [lawsuit], Daily Mail



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Easy Fix
By Paj on 3/8/2012 10:25:38 AM , Rating: 2
quote:
Really? The rise of lawyers that are just itching to take on any cause for money has become the best labor protection there is in the US. Fear of class action lawsuits IMO is what keeps allot of large corporations in line nowdays.


That doesn't have a lot to do with unionism, more to do with regulation.

quote:
What is high to you? I would also think that you equate higher rates of gun ownership to higher murder rates, while the FBI has estimated that guns probably prevent at least 2 million crimes each year. Wish I could find the link on that for you, but crimes prevented by the use of a gun are not reported on by media, since that would go against their bias against guns.


The debate will no doubt rage on for ever. In my view, gun ownership in the US has its roots in 18th century paranoia about tyranny and the British. I find it amusing that the government allows its citizenry to own arms to be used as an instrument against tyranny, yet its perfectly OK to use pepper spray against handcuffed civilians.

quote:
I will agree with you on this, something needs to be done about it.


Glad we agree. Perhaps the point above has a lot to do with it?

quote:
Afghanistan, started out as a war of vengeance and the people of Afghanistan did understand that, however it turned into something else for political purposes when people in DC took control from the soldiers. Iraq was pointless IMO.


Yep. Aside from the wars, the degree to which the US has meddled in foreign governments is astonishing - Latin America, Iran, Europe, Israel, for most of the 20th century.

quote:
Old history and not really uncommon for any country in history.


True, this still doesn't make it OK.

quote:
Well the poor here in the US are better off than most of the poor in the world, however IMO there is no solution to the poverty problem. Some people will excel within a given system while others will not be able to cope, a reminder that everybody is different. Offering equal opportunity to all will not give equal results to all.


We make more than enough food to feed everyone, enough money to give everyone a decent standard of living. Greed, corruption and indifference prevent this from happening - nothing more.

quote:
People in the US need a revolution, government has gotten to big and out of touch with the citizens. I think that one of the founding fathers said that revolution was necessary from time to time.


You're probably right about that.


RE: Easy Fix
By Ringold on 3/8/2012 2:24:24 PM , Rating: 1
quote:
We make more than enough food to feed everyone, enough money to give everyone a decent standard of living. Greed, corruption and indifference prevent this from happening - nothing more.


Average "poor" person is probably overweight in America. Dont have a link to prove it, but I suspect.

The same "poor" person, relative to the rest, in Somalia probably is much shorter than they should be, malnourished, and looks like bones shrink-wrapped in skin.

Lets be fair and accept that the welfare state in America is generous enough that, accounting for all the products and services the "poor" consume that they probably don't HAVE to consume (like cell phones), they have plenty enough to feed themselves. And a local news station here in Florida revealed abuse, fraud, and incredible waste in food stamps around here, ranging from using food stamp cards to pay for porn, to using them at casinos, and just paying twice what was necessary with the poor loading up on groceries at gas stations.


RE: Easy Fix
By Paj on 3/8/2012 3:04:19 PM , Rating: 2
I wasn't referring to the USA, but the world. An estimated 30-40% of perfectly good food is thrown away in the Western world. If that wasnt bad enough, it could be used as fertilizer, fuel, or to feed the world's poor, but instead mostly goes to landfill.


"People Don't Respect Confidentiality in This Industry" -- Sony Computer Entertainment of America President and CEO Jack Tretton














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki