Print 18 comment(s) - last by conejo99.. on Mar 8 at 10:16 AM

AT&T's contracts for unlimited data users have always stated that restrictions could be applied

After catching some heat for throttling unlimited data last month, AT&T may receive a little less flack due to contract clauses that always stated it had the power to limit such services.

AT&T currently does not offer unlimited data plans for new subscribers. Instead, it switched to tiered data plans where a certain amount of data was allotted to customers for a set price. Currently, these plans are set at 300 MB/month for $20, 3 GB/month for $30, or 5 GB/month for $50. However, customers who did have unlimited plans before they were axed had the option to hold onto the unlimited package.

Last year, AT&T said it would throttle unlimited smartphone users starting October 2011, which was set to affect the top 5 percent of heavy data users. AT&T planned to slow data speeds once the customers reached a certain point, but never specified when that point was.

Just last month, AT&T unlimited users took to the internet when some realized that their unlimited data was throttled only after 1-2 GB. Some complained that they received notices from AT&T saying they were reaching their slowed point only after 1.6 GB, and others have said their download speed dropped to 256 Kbps after 3 GB of data.

Now, a website called TOSBack, which tracks changes to the terms of service of different companies, showed that AT&T has had a clause in its contracts regarding unlimited data plan restrictions since 2007 -- right before the iPhone came out.

"AT&T reserves the right to (i) limit throughput or amount of data transferred, deny Service and/or terminate Service, without notice, to anyone it believes is using the Service in any manner prohibited above or whose usage adversely impacts its wireless network or service levels or hinders access to its wireless network," said the clause in AT&T's contract from June 26, 2007.

Today's version is quite similar, where section 6.2 points out that AT&T can restrict those who negatively impact its wireless network.

"AT&T reserves the right to (i) deny, disconnect, modify and/or terminate Service, without notice, to anyone it believes is using the Service in any manner prohibited or whose usage adversely impacts its wireless network or service levels or hinders access to its wireless network," said today's AT&T contract.

Source: MacRumors

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Google definition
By drycrust3 on 3/6/2012 2:23:48 PM , Rating: 2
Maybe AT&T should look into upgrading their network, so that their network wont be [I]adversely affected[/I] when people use the service they pay for.

You are correct, AT&T should upgrade their network, but that costs money, which brings us to the question of where does that money come from? Obviously it comes from their paying customers. Notice that? The responsibility for paying for the upgrades is placed upon their existing paying customers. So how should AT&T distribute the cost of the network upgrades a small percentage of users forces AT&T to carry out?
As I've said before, the biggest users are the ones who should pay the biggest amount because they are the ones who put the biggest stress on the network. Charging those customers more also encourages them to moderate their behaviour (or move to another phone company), which reduces the urgency for network upgrades.

RE: Google definition
By conejo99 on 3/6/2012 2:56:01 PM , Rating: 2
And you are correct, it does cost money for AT&T to upgrade their network, and that money must come from somewhere. However that just explains why AT&T wants to do this, it doesn't give them the contractual right to do so. It seems to me that the important point is that AT&T can throttle uses to protect its network, not to force customer's into changing their contract. Limiting heavy users at peak times is a reasonable way to enforce the contract, but arbitrary limits do not seem reasonable.

RE: Google definition
By tamalero on 3/8/2012 12:47:15 AM , Rating: 2
Hang on, weren't they given millions of gov money to expand and upgrade their networks.. and they used it to just merge and buy smaller ones?

"Well, we didn't have anyone in line that got shot waiting for our system." -- Nintendo of America Vice President Perrin Kaplan

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki