backtop


Print 10 comment(s) - last by JohnThacker.. on Mar 7 at 9:33 PM

Verizon and AT&T also look to battle T-Mobile and rural television providers in push for new spectrum auction

Verizon Wireless, a joint venture between Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ) and Vodafone Group Plc. (LON:VOD), is not one to shy from controversy.  Now it has dived right into another.

I. T-Mobile

The company, along with SpectrumCo -- a joint venture between Time Warner Cable Inc. (TWC), Comcast Corp. (CMCSA), and Bright House Networks -- wrote a filing to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, begging them to approve a major spectrum sale.

In the document Verizon Wireless claims that it may run out of spectrum "in some areas" of the U.S. by as early as next year -- 2013.  The carrier predicts that its holdings will be almost completely exhausted by as early as 2015.  

The proposed remedy is the sale of SpectrumCo's so-called AWS ("advanced wireless services") spectrum for $3.6B USD (Comcast gets $2.3B USD, TWC pockets $1.1B USD, and Bright House earns $189M USD).

The heavily redacted document offers scant clues as to how Verizon Wireless came to these predictions.  However, Verizon Wireless is deploying new spectrum-hungry LTE at a rapid pace, with its network currently covering an industry-leading 200+ million Americans.

Verizon Lightning
Verizon Wireless warns that spectrum shortages may kill its LTE thunder.
[Image Source: Verizon]

The document hints that Verizon Wireless plans to combat shortage with LTE femtocells -- a similar technique to that used by rival AT&T, Inc. (T) to shore up its deficient 3G network in urban areas.  Verizon Wireless also cited plans to repurpose CDMA 1x spectrum for LTE use.

Verizon has tried to scale back demand by increasing its data fees to the highest in the industry for data.  However, it relented during the holidays, offering "double data" contracts, effectively offering the cheapest rates in the industry.

Some smaller carriers like Deutsche Telekom AG's (ETR:DTE) T-Mobile USA have sought to block the large sale, fearful that it would create a winner takes all atmosphere, or in T-Mobile's words an "excessive concentration" of spectrum.  Indeed, Verizon Wireless' current spectrum holdings are thought to grossly exceed those of third and fourth largest mobile carriers Sprint Nextel Corp. (S) and T-Mobile USA.

Still, the FCC may have troubled denying Verizon.  After all, it just approved AT&T's acquisition of a block of unused spectrum from Qualcomm, Inc. (QCOM).

II. Spectrum Auction Battle Also Looms

Regardless of the outcome in the proposed AWS purchase, both Verizon Wireless and AT&T are also pushing hard for the approval of President Obama's proposed spectrum repurposing auction.  The proposed auction is currently stalled, as it lacks the Congressional authorization to go forward, amid a partisan stalemate that's affecting a broad host of issues.

The issue at hand is that some television providers who bought spectrum licenses are now sitting on unused spectrum after the transition to digital television.  The proposal by the Obama administration is to allow these companies to voluntarily sell their spectrum in a special FCC auction.  The FCC would keep a cut of the proceeds, allowing it to deliver a nationwide emergency response network and begin national broadband efforts.  The rest of the proceeds would go to the licensee.

Auction wide
AT&T and Verizon are fighting to convince Congress to authorize a special spectrum (re)auction.
[Image Source: Oscar Hidalgo for The New York Times]

While many television broadcasters support the auction and salivate at the prospective revenue, others are trying to block their peers' right to sell.  They cite interference concerns, despite the Obama administration's insistence that this is a non-issue from a technical standpoint.

The proposed auction will likely see similar opposition from smaller carriers like T-Mobile who fear that it will give AT&T and Verizon and opportunity to gobble up more spectrum -- and more market share, as a result.

Sources: The Verge, Greenville Online



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Is selling spectrum the best option?
By JohnThacker on 3/7/2012 12:06:35 PM , Rating: 2
Selling spectrum is definitely the best option.

If you think companies sit on spectrum now, you should see how they sat on spectrum when it was simply given to them for free based on political considerations and the promises that they be the best for the customer's needs.

Verizon and AT&T are using their spectrum. The companies that are really doing nothing with it are the old TV broadcasters that got theirs (both a long time ago and grandfathered in) through the exact process that you're advocating. Or rather, what actually happens when the process you're advocating gets adopted, instead of your ideal.

The alternative to auctions is pure politics. I'd rather have Verizon and AT&T pay money to the Treasury and the people as a whole than pay money to the re-election campaigns of influential politicians.


RE: Is selling spectrum the best option?
By HoosierEngineer5 on 3/7/2012 3:59:59 PM , Rating: 2
Although it is an unfair comparison (since TV is ad-supported), I don't pay ANYTHING (directly) for terrestrial broadcast television. Wouldn't it be neat if we could do the same for bits and bytes?


By JohnThacker on 3/7/2012 9:33:33 PM , Rating: 2
I can imagine something that does ad-supported free Internet already-- NetZero is, amazingly, still around. It's not too hard to imagine that model expanding, but it seems like most people (like with cable TV) would rather pay.

That "directly" is an important caveat. We all pay quite a bit by, for example, having all that useful spectrum sitting their unused, given away to the TV companies.

You can also do some interesting things with a Kindle (especially the older ones) and only pay up front one cost that's less than the cost of buying a TV.


"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki