Verizon Complains That it Must Lock Android Devices in Order to "Manage" Them
March 1, 2012 2:16 PM
comment(s) - last by
Carrier's response to the FCC is unappologetic
Google Inc. (
) is supposedly a
champion of developer rights and software freedoms
. So it seems highly curious that while the majority of Android manufacturers like Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) and HTC Corp. (
unlock their bootloaders
phones (such as the popular Droid RAZR) are still locked up tighter than Fort Knox.
Unlocked bootloaders allow for custom ROMs and the removal of
unwanted carrier "bloatware"
. This is particularly handy for independent developers, who may wish to test apps on several different versions of Android, on one device.
I. Motorola: Locked up Tight
On the other hand, a locked bootloader can be a daunting obstacle to enthusiasts. It takes a lot of effort to reverse engineer one. Although unlocking the bootloader via exploits
, the difficulty factor means it is
done for only a handful of the top selling phones
such as Apple, Inc.'s (
) iPhone. And even in these cases, the exploitation process
creates security risks
, which the company and unlockers must patch. All of this is less ideal than in the case where the carrier provides a secure, authorized bootloader unlock.
Motorola in posts to Twitter indicated that its phones were "
locked per carrier
But was this really the case?
II. Verizon Defends Locking
It appears so.
A reader of the site
filed a complaint with the U.S. Federal Communications Commission about the bootloader locking of Motorola phones on the network of Verizon Wireless, a joint venture between Verizon Communications Inc. (
) and Vodafone Group Plc. (
), and AT&T Inc. (
). The user complains to the FCC that the provisions of Verizon Wireless's government "Block C" spectrum license prohibit such actions.
In response to the complaint Verizon Wireless,
the largest U.S. carrier
, strongly disagrees with that sentiment. It wrote the following letter to the FCC:
Verizon's statements echo Apple's who has long
fought ardently with unlockers
III. With Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
In reality, Verizon and Apple are right to an extent -- greater freedom of unlocked hardware means more risk (the digital analogy of getting your drivers license) that third-party ROMs
might allow malware
or interfere with the fundamental network hardware, such as data transfer utilities or the phone's antenna-dependent signal strength algorithms.
However, it's also an excuse for control. Some of this control -- such as fighting pirated apps -- is at least mildly pro-developer. Other aspects of control, such as user monitoring and
punishing unauthorized tethers
, are more questionable, given that it can detract from a user's experience and or endanger them.
The issue of user monitoring was especially noteworthy, given that it was recently found that HTC's smartphone were
printing sensitive information
via a monitoring app. And aside from the
HTC-specific security risk
, the revelation raised
about how much data was being collected, and
who it might be shared with
. The scandal appeared to be part of what pushed HTC to unlock its bootloader.
via Twitter that it did not use Carrier IQ. But domain lookups looks show that Verizon Wireless owns IPs associated with Carrier IQ domain names, according
. Some have speculated that Verizon may have simply rebranded the app, disguising its name (which would make its above denial
correct in literal terms).
And that's not to mention that unlocking allows Verizon to lock consumers to its network by disallowing their handsets to work on other networks -- an anti-competitive technique.
And ultimately the biggest point is that locking makes a developer unable to test their product broadly on one handset, locking out small developers from the process -- or more likely convincing them to pick a less restrictive carrier/OEM.
The decision definitely makes Verizon Wireless the carrier
to choose for those considering Android development.
Verizon is the most expensive carrier and one of the least friendly U.S. carriers when it comes to developer boot unlocking. [Image Source: Flickr/Exif]
For average customers, it's one more factor to weigh. Verizon has
industry leading customer service ratings
nation's largest LTE (4G) network
, but also
charges more than any other carrier
for its data plans.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: VZN is no angel
3/1/2012 3:38:16 PM
I don't think people typically think Verizon is better at things like customer service or pricing our device selection, etc...
Most people who claim Verizon is better are typically talking about the quality of the service and availability of the service in various areas. VZW doesn't always take the crown, but at least where I live, which is a NYC suburb that is highly populated with both people and cell towers, VZW beats other carriers for service 9 out of 10 places you test.
RE: VZN is no angel
3/1/2012 7:10:07 PM
Verizon has horrible data. Only with LTE are they beginning to catch up and surpass AT&T's old 3g network. For talk they are great if you wander in real rural areas (think parts of Alabama.)
RE: VZN is no angel
3/2/2012 9:24:04 PM
Ha! AT&T and 3G don't belong in the same sentience without the addition of roflcopter in my area.
Check northwest PA's coverage map for AT&T. They have their fake "4G" (aka 3.5G HSPA+ network), and mostly... yeah you are seeing that, EDGE. Gotta love how they fool people with their false marketing that HSPA+ is 4G.
After AT&T purchased this former CellularOne area, they haven't done a damn thing to upgrade the networks in this area. Call quality has gone to crap, and my cousins who install Satellite dishes in the area can't rely on the network to perform their job. They stick to Verizon and so do I.
Want to see even more crap, look at the Sprint coverage.. more 2G only service... does not work for my data needs (which is cellular internet.. my ONLY non-dialup option with decent speed).
But its no wonder AT&T doesn't make any money around here. Most people who are former CellularOne moved to Verizon when their contact's expired and with good reason: being treated like crap by AT&T. Also doesn't help that everyone I know that owns an iPhone, are grandfathered in on $15 unlimited data.. wonder how long that will keep up?
"Folks that want porn can buy an Android phone." -- Steve Jobs
HTC Admits to Sense UI "Bloat", Says Sense 4.0 is Less Complex
March 1, 2012, 11:03 AM
Google is Now (Almost) the Proud Owner of Motorola After EU/U.S. Approval
February 14, 2012, 11:40 AM
Hackers Mug Google's Wallet App on Rooted Android Devices
February 9, 2012, 10:45 AM
Mobile Carrier Report Card: Sprint, et. al Survive Hellish Quarter
February 8, 2012, 3:42 PM
HTC Begrudgingly Allows Bootloader Unlocking
December 30, 2011, 10:33 AM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information