Print 92 comment(s) - last by 8meagain.. on Mar 11 at 3:50 AM

The "tree lobster", a rare species of giant insect was thought to be extinct.  (Source: Patrick Honan)
Invasive species almost killed these magnificent bugs, but in the end they were saved by a chance relocation

What black and shiny and as big as your hand?  If you guessed "Devonian Period-esque mountain insect" you are a winner.

The bizarre Dryococelus australis is a throwback species.  The hardy arthropods long hailed from Lord Howe Island, a small island midway between Australia and New Zealand.  The species of tree insect lived fruitfully since the human colonization of the island, until a fateful day in 1918, when disaster struck.

Lord Howe Island
Lord Howe Island
[Images Source: Stephanie d'Otreppe / NPR (left), Wikimedia Commons (right)]

The S.S. Makambo a sea liner travelling from Britain ran aground.  And from its destroyed hull scurried several small mammalian survivors -- European black rats.  The omnivorous mammals soon found an indigenous food they were quite fond of -- the tree insect.  Soon, thanks to the invasive species, the insects -- which locals affectionately referred to as "tree lobsters" had joined the likes of the Tasmanian Wolf -- extinct.  Their last sighting was in 1920.

But 13 miles away from the tiny Lord Howe Island (modern population: 341) sits an even tinier island, the spire remnant of a sea volcano, dubbed "Ball's Pyramid" after the British naval office who first spotted the 7 million year old spire in 1788.

Ball's Pyramid
Ball's Pyramid [Images Source: John White (left); Google Maps (right)]

The spire is utterly uninhabitable and remote, but proved a joyous climb for adventurers with a solid set of equipment.  And those climbers discovered the island's secret -- a spindly bush located in a nook 225 feet above sea level.

Climbers in the 1960s first noted insect corpses resembling the famed tree lobsters.  But confirmation was difficult as the beasties were nocturnal.  But in 2001 a pair of Australian scientists David Priddel and Nicholas Carlile and two assistants scaled the island.  At first they were discouraged at seeing only crickets.

But under a melaleuca bush they spotted insect droppings.  Returning with flashlights at night they hit pay dirt -- 24 scurrying tree lobsters climbing on the bush and in the dirt below it.

Tree Lobsters
Meet the "tree lobster" in all her glory!
[Image Source: Rod Morris (left); Patrick Honan/Nick Carlile (right)]

Fast forward two years and Australian researchers and conservationists had received permission to collect a few of the insects for a captive breeding effort.  A landslide had recently struck and the researchers were fearful they'd be returning only to find insect corpses.  But the insects had apparently survived everything nature had thrown their way and were still scurrying about their favorite bush.  

Four were collected on Valentine's Day 2003.  Tragically, two quickly died.  That left only a male and female, which researchers named "Adam" and "Eve".  Eve almost perished as well due to illness, but was cured at the last moment by Patrick Honan, head of the Melbourne Zoo's invertebrate conservation breeding group.  Recalls Jane Goodall in a Discover magazine piece and a separate story with Australian Broadcasting Company:

Eve became very, very sick. Patrick ... worked every night for a month desperately trying to cure her. ... Eventually, based on gut instinct, Patrick concocted a mixture that included calcium and nectar and fed it to his patient, drop by drop, as she lay curled up in his hand.

She went from being on her back curled up in my hand, almost as good as dead, to being up and walking around within a couple of hours.

Eve survived and bred with Adam, producing 30 fertile eggs.  The babies would go on to flourish.  And from that line 700 adults and tens of thousands of eggs have been bred.

In a world first, zookeeper Rohan Cleave captured the amazing hatching process of a critically endangered Lord Howe Island Stick Insect at Melbourne Zoo. The eggs incubate for over 6 months and until now the hatching process has never been witnessed. If you didn't see it you wouldn't believe it could fit in that egg! [Source: Vimeo/The Melbourne Zoo]

(Note: This success came in part thanks to the fact that invertebrates have shorter, more consistent genomes and thus are less sensitive to lack of genetic diversity in a population.  Two insects can yield a healthy population, where as two mammals -- say tigers -- likely do not have enough genetic diversity to continue a species.)

Today the discussion turns to whether to reintroduce the tree lobsters to their natural home, which mankind disturbed -- Howe Island.  The researchers are conducting a public relations campaign to try to encourage the islanders to embrace their shiny black invertebrate comrades.

Where the story goes next is anyone's guess, but the story of the critters is already quite epic.  To quote Jurassic Park's Dr. Ian Malcolm, "Life will find a way."

Sources: NPR, Discover Magazine, Australian Broadcasting Company

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Kyuu on 3/1/2012 1:23:07 PM , Rating: 2
The fact that other animals alter their environment, that species can and do go extinct without human intervention one way or the other, and similar tripe is no justification for being an ecological douchebag. In the case of these insects, a human ship ran aground and introduced an invasive species that completely eliminated the population of said insect, and the species only survived by happening to have a small colony on a nearby, barren little island. There were two scientists with the interest and capability to bring them back from the brink of extinction, and they did. The end.

Yeah, they're "only" insects, but then, you're only an annoying, mostly bald mammal. Why should I give more of a crap about you than I do these insects? At least they don't engage in partisan political posturing as people like FITcamero and Reclaimer like to do, and I bet they're less repulsive to look at too (yeah, I had to sneak in a personal attack in there, this is DailyTech isn't it)?

But really, if you're going to pull the "we're animals too so it it's okay if we destroy the environment blah blah blah" argument it goes both ways. If you poke an animal enough, it may get mad and tear your throat out. So I guess it's okay if these people that FITcamero and Reclaimer are continually poking on this website go ahead and do that? I mean, you just said it's okay since we're only animals right?

We have the capability to understand the effect we have on our environment and the other forms of life we share this planet with, and the capability to affect it on a much larger scale than any other form of life here ever could. The gift of that level of mental acuity also gives us the responsibility to be ecologically mindful as we progress forward whenever possible. Unless you're an uncaring douchebag, of course. But I'd rather share my bed with these giant insects than live in the sort of world that will result from progressing without any thought to preserving the environment and our fellow life forms inhabiting this rock.

Oh and Mick... you really need to have an editor look over your articles and/or proofread through a couple times. There are some incredibly awkward sentences in there.

RE: *sigh*
By Keeir on 3/1/2012 2:03:02 PM , Rating: 2
Mammal population on islands to evolve in sometimes surprising ways

To reintroduce this insect to the Howe Islands, all the rats had to be eradicated. This would prevent the birth of a new species evolved out of these rats.

Humans have made a value judgement in this case.

1.) This strange insect's past place on this island is more important than rats' future place on the island.
2.) The difference in value is worth enough to enact the change and maintain the change.

I think both 1. and 2. are arguable points... for any perspective except one that says "We humans are gods! The enviroment around us in X year MUST NOT CHANGE!"

RE: *sigh*
By daneren2005 on 3/1/2012 6:10:41 PM , Rating: 2
The problem with these stupid projects is that they aren't trying to save actual lives, they are trying to preserve a SPECIES. These people don't give 2 craps about the actual insects themselves, they are just trying to stop species from going extinct. Why in the world does the existence or non-existence of a species make any difference?

RE: *sigh*
By osserc on 3/2/2012 11:22:26 AM , Rating: 2
I'm still trying to determine which part of a ship wreck is a deliberate attempt to upset an isolated ecosystem.

And further, what is the benefit to the planet of spending so much time and energy rebuilding this species of insect?

It seems like a standard scientific ego trip, but as long as they aren't siphoning the money from my pocket then they are free to trip all they want.

"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home

Most Popular Articles5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Automaker Porsche may expand range of Panamera Coupe design.
September 18, 2016, 11:00 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
No More Turtlenecks - Try Snakables
September 19, 2016, 7:44 AM
ADHD Diagnosis and Treatment in Children: Problem or Paranoia?
September 19, 2016, 5:30 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki