Monsanto Defeats Small Farmers in Critical Bioethics Class Action Suit
March 1, 2012 4:49 PM
comment(s) - last by
Company argues it's not "out to get" America's small population of organic farmers, cites lack of lawsuits
Monsanto Comp. (
) is a firm with a
long and controversial history
. It is accused of
abusing intellectual property rights
to sue small farms (allowing its patented crops to blow seeds onto their properties, then suing them); trying to bribe officials in Canada and Indonesia [
]; and suing dairy farmers who advertise that their milk
doesn't contain growth hormones
. They also were the company responsible for spraying Agent Orange all over soldiers in Vietnam, which is thought to have led to cancer and other ailments.
I. The Farmers Sue Monsanto
Those criticisms are unlikely to go away, particularly in the wake of a controversial decision by
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York
, a federal court.
Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald
moved this week to throw out a potential class action lawsuit [
], sought by small independent farmers.
In the case the farmers, led by lead plaintiff Bryce Stephens, sought relief against Monsanto in the form a prohibition on Monsanto from bringing suit against organic farmers regarding seed contamination, given the really real possibility of cross-pollination via the wind and animals.
Mr. Stephens, who received degrees from Wichita State University (Kans.) and Washburn University (Kans.), turned away from a potentially lucrative career in law to instead run an 1,000 acre family farm that has been organic since 1994. But Mr. Stephens states that he was unable to grow organic soybeans -- a high demand crop -- for two reason both tracing to
Monsanto's transgenic crops
First, he says that his neighbors grew the transgenic strain. When other farmers in the area took their soybeans to be genetically tested, they test positive for Monsanto's patented genes -- the Monsanto crop had spread its germ into their fields. As bulk buyers who supply such mega-health food chains such as Whole Food Market, Inc. (
) test for transgenic genetics, this would have made his crop essentially worthless. It is estimated that between 0.5 and 2 percent of "organic" corn is really genetically modified.
Pollen contamination from neighboring farmers who use Monsanto's seeds can see an organic farmer's product banned from big buyers like Whole Foods Market.
[Image Source: Getty Images]
Second, there was the implied threat that even if he did try to sell his organic crop to various small buyers that Monsanto might sue. He writes, "I have long been aware of Monsanto's campaign of patent accusations against farmers. This has been well publicized in news reports and documentaries about the farming industry that I have read and seen. I have also personally contributed support through certain organizations to help a specific farmer that was sued by Monsanto for patent infringement."
Now Mr. Stephens and his fellow organic farmers had several legal options at their disposal -- for example, they could have sent a legal cease and desist letter Monsanto to try to prevent future suits. Instead, their attorney
(the lead attorney) of the
Public Patent Foundation
opted for a novel approach -- file a class action suit looking to put in place a "laws of nature" based preliminary injunction that would prohibit Monsanto from suing small farmers for seed contamination, or at least put restrictions on the practice.
The class was expected to grow to at least 3,000 organic farmers, had it been authorized.
II. But Were the Tables Really Turned?
However, things were killed before they even took off. The judge apparently took issue with the fact that none of the farmers had been personally threatened by Monsanto, and the fact that Monsanto only brought a small number of patent infringement suits last year.
The company successfully argued that the suit was pointless as
was not sue if "trace" amounts of patented seed were found on an organic farmer's land.
Wrote the judge, "[the allegations] are unsubstantiated ... given that not one single plaintiff claims to have been so threatened." She also complained that the farmers had "overstate[d] the magnitude of [Monsanto's] patent enforcement", which documents indicated entailed 13 cases last year, which she opined "is hardly significant when compared to the number of farms in the United States, approximately two million."
Of course, that ruling does overlook the fact there are only 13,000 organic farmers in the U.S., out of those 2 million [
Dan Ravicher, executive director of the Public Patent Foundation and lead lawyer for the plaintiffs said the ruling will allow Monsanto to continue "patent bullying" and called it "gravely disappointing."
Farmers were unable to convince a federal judge that their farms were endangered by Monsanto. [Image Source: Katherine Leigh Photography]
It appears Monsanto has been tentative in terms of probing suits towards organic farmers whose fields contain small amounts of "Round Up Ready" soybeans (which produce their own pesticides) or other patented corn, soy, canola and cotton crops. Most of the farmers sued in the U.S. have been traditional farmers who refused to pay Monsanto's seed fees, but were found with substantial amounts of Monsanto seed growing on their land. These farmers have traditionally argued foul play, but it's a murkier situation as -- unlike the organic farmers -- they could potentially
financially by illicitly using Monsanto's crop (as their buyers don't care about GMO content).
Monsanto did try one high profile organic farm suit in Canada, and won. It scored a $400,000 USD damages payout. However, Percy Schmeiser took Monsanto to the Canadian Supreme Court. The highest court in Canada ruled that Monsanto's patents are valid (in Canada), but that it could not enforce the damages due to the ambiguity. Mr. Schmeiser tells his side of the story in an audio recording on his homepage. Monsanto, meanwhile, paints the farmer as a liar and villain
III. Future Uncertain
The company insists that it doesn't see itself as an aggressor towards organic farmers.
Monsanto executive VP David F. Snively, "This decision is a win for all farmers as it underscores that agricultural practices such as biotechnology, organic and conventional systems do and will continue to effectively coexist in the agricultural marketplace."
While both sides have very different views, the
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Advisory Committee on Biotechnology in the 21st Century
is taking the organic farmers' concerns seriously in
, where they're discussing how to handle these tricky patent issues.
The USDA that certifies (and stickers) organic produce, is concerned about the issue of pollen contamination. [Image Source: The Healing Kitchen]
, a senior scientist with the
Union of Concerned Scientists
, told NPR's food and agriculture blog
, "Beyond whatever happens with this suit, there are some very legitimate issues behind it. There is already a significant burden to organic food production, and there is more coming. It raises the question: Is it possible for organic agriculture to survive in the face of GM crops?"
Dan Ravicher is considering whether to appeal the dismissal, on behalf of the farmers.
Public Patent Foundation 
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Monsanto has no future
3/2/2012 9:54:34 AM
I have to appologize because my facts were based from early 2011, but we are both misleading, however you are more misleading.
Click on the max projection to view the IPO shares from initial listing. Due to the bettering economy many companies are doing better including Monsanto. However, the dramatic decrease in the recession is slowly being recovered and will take further hits when oil climbs again as their petro products will become more costly.
All time high is in 2008, not 2011.
Click on 10Y for more accurate projection as you can see they have gone down from 63 billion capital markets in 2008 to 43 in 2011. 20 billion loss is no small loss.
My facts are mostly proven other than my mistake but I have references, though you have a higher rating in this thread my facts have references and are concrete.
RE: Monsanto has no future
3/2/2012 12:25:00 PM
My figures are correct. The first day Monsanto traded was Oct 18 2000 and the price closed at $8.48, as of this moment it is trading at $80.9, that is a 850% return. The S&P 500, a broad gague of US listed companies, is basically trading at the same price as the day Monsanto listed close to 11 years ago.
Just because the market cap is below its pre-Lehman high does not mean the business is in decline. Microsoft's market cap hit its all-time high in 2000 during the tech bubble, revenues and profits have more than doubled since then but under your flawed logic that would have been a 'decline'.
You said their revenues are 'declining' and that is plain incorrect. Like I said, Monsanto revenues hit an all-time high in 2011 and are projected to hit a 10% higher all time high in 2012. That is not 'declining' by any stretch if the imagination, its called 'growth'. If people werent buying their products their sales would not be growing. Your post is wrong and if you need further explanation as to why you need to go back to elementary school.
RE: Monsanto has no future
3/2/2012 2:13:42 PM
projected the trend and you countered with Monsanto's initial IPO in comparison to last more recent IPO without understanding or reflecting on historical aspects relating to the industry, culture or even recent events.
RE: Monsanto has no future
3/2/2012 5:02:48 PM
You have good points, but calling people idiots or telling them to go back to elementary school sours the mood. Be courteus and professional. Thank you.
"I'd be pissed too, but you didn't have to go all Minority Report on his ass!" -- Jon Stewart on police raiding Gizmodo editor Jason Chen's home
AntiSec Exposes U.S. Soldiers' S/Ns, Passwords, Vows Attack on Monsanto
July 12, 2011, 8:45 AM
U.S. Farmers Realize Disadvantages of Genetically Engineered Seed
October 5, 2010, 3:41 PM
U.S. Air Force F-35 Lightning II, F-22 Raptor Team Up for “Integration Training”
November 19, 2014, 9:15 AM
U.S. Marshals Using Fake, Airplane-based Cell Towers to Scan Cell Phones of Americans
November 14, 2014, 9:05 AM
Ford Enlists Wind Energy Corp. to Provide Wind, Solar Energy to Four U.S. Dealerships
November 10, 2014, 10:58 AM
Disney Reveals Star Wars Ep. VII Title -- "The Force Awakens"
November 6, 2014, 3:45 PM
U.S. Navy Lockheed F-35C Completes First Carrier Landing
November 4, 2014, 12:44 PM
Microsoft Co-founder Paul Allen Donates $100M to Fight Raging Ebola Epidemic
October 23, 2014, 6:05 PM
Most Popular Articles
Uber Exec Threatens to "Spend Millions" to Stalk Female Reporter and Her Family
November 19, 2014, 12:31 PM
Apple Replaces “FREE” Label with “GET” on App Downloads in iTunes App Store
November 19, 2014, 5:38 PM
Rand Paul Casts Crucial "No" Vote on Obama-Backed PATRIOT Act Renewal Bill
November 19, 2014, 5:15 PM
FTC Announces Crackdown on Computer Speedup/Tech Support Scams
November 20, 2014, 1:40 PM
Wal-Mart: Miss Thanksgiving, Get Xbox One + Master Chief Collection for $299
November 17, 2014, 9:40 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
Space Terrorism is a Looming Threat For the United States
Apr 23, 2014, 7:47 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information