German Court Overturns Android Victory Due to FRAND Concerns
February 27, 2012 7:24 PM
comment(s) - last by
German court rules Apple's FRAND licensing proposal is fair enough, would be illegal for Motorola to refuse
A German appeals court has handed Apple, Inc. (
) a major victory this week, at the expense of
) acquisition Motorola Mobility. The Karlsruhe Higher Regional Court ("Oberlandesgericht Karlsruhe") elected to stay a preliminary injunction by the lower Mannheim Court, an injunction which could have -- at least online --
banned sales of iPhones and iPads
I. iPad, iPhone Ban Would be Illegal Says Appeals Court
To understand the ruling you have to understand German patent law. In the European Union, different member states have different patent court systems, despite sharing a single unified intellectual property registrar.
In Germany, lower federal courts launch cases along two separate tracks -- an infringement track, and a validity track. The infringement track can ban (via preliminary injunction) a product or service, even if there's a modest prospect that a patent is invalid. The infringement proceedings are typically only stayed by a lower court if there is a "high likelihood" (70-80 percent) of invalidity.
By contrast, German federal appeals courts can stay the infringement proceedings (and potential product bans) if there's a modest (think 50 percent or greater) chance of invalidity.
In this particular case, the infringement track was paused due to a special type of invalidity concern -- invalidity not based on the patent being invalid, but invalidity based on it being illegal to litigate with the patent under current licensing rules.
German authorities have ruled that it would be illegal for Motorola to seek a sales ban on the iPhone and iPad, given Apple's relatively fair licensing proposal. (Pictured: Munich's Apple store) [Image Source: Apple Insider]
The Karlsruhe court ruled that Apple's latest licensing proposal was fair and reasonable enough that Motorola was legally obligated to license the patent to its rival. The key point in the case was that the patents in the case (which Apple was found to infringe by lacking a license) were 3G standards patents governed by fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) licensing terms.
Motorola made it clear it had a lot of issues with Apple's licensing proposal, and for a time the appeals court appeared to be on its side. But via an "iterative approach", Apple crafted a licensing proposal, which was the appeals court felt was fair enough,
. To refuse to license under the terms of that revised offer would be a clear antitrust violation, the German appeals court stated.
A translated ruling is available
II. Growing Headaches for Motorola, Google
Some experts (such as
blogger Florian Mueller) are saying that this loss is especially painful for Google/Motorola as the German court system is relatively friendly to FRAND patent holders using the standards patents to litigate against other FRAND standards holders.
As Apple is also involved in some FRAND patents, the German court was more receptive to Motorola's claims that other international courts might be; a perspective originally praised by Google.
Motorola Mobility's efforts to litigate with 3G FRAND patents aren't working out very well.
[Image Source: Trak]
The loss adds to the cloud floating over Motorola and Google, as a European Union probe into potential FRAND patent abuse continues. Motorola is fighting a two-front war against Apple and Microsoft Corp. (
). Last week Microsoft
filed an EU complaint
against Motorola, claiming it was committing antitrust violations by refusing to license certain FRAND patents.
III. Battle is Far From Over
While Motorola's litigious efforts against Apple are significantly weakened by the ruling, all is not lost for the phonemaker. Motorola has a
non-FRAND ban on the iCloud's push email in Germany
, which is likely to be enforced for at least a year until the appeal is heard. Unlike the iPhone/iPad ban, the appeal is unlikely to be expedited as the case does not share the same compelling FRAND questions.
could be banned by April
if it does not adopt a new unlock mechanism, following a German judge's decision that Motorola's lock graphic violated Apple's pair of patents [
] on a swipe unlock. Motorola stands a good chance of getting this overturned at the appeals level, given the
amount of prior art
. Such prior art was
used to toss out similar claims in the Netherlands
, where invalidity and infringement proceedings are lumped together into a single track.
Motorola's forbidden swipe to unlock gesture [Image Source: YouTube]
However, like Apple with the iCloud ban, Motorola must likely wait almost a year to get the decision tossed, as it is a non-FRAND issue. Motorola will likely be forced to implement
alternative unlock gestures
. Samsung Electronic Comp., Ltd. (
) -- threatened with a similar German ban -- has already done this, putting in place a circular slide to unlock motion.
While the new unlock is clunky, it is likely to prevent Apple from being able to ban the company's products from the market, and may have the added perk of encouraging customers to use Android's more secure built-in Grid Unlock (which was not found to be infringement in Germany to date).
In the long run it's anybody's guess what could happen in Germany. An appeal could allow Motorola to (re)enforce its FRAND-based iPad/iPhone ban, if the first appeals court decision is overturned. Motorola could even invalidate Apple's swipe-to-unlock IP. Alternatively, Motorola could see its iCloud victory nullified and be forced to maintain painful user interface changes, should things go wholesale in Apple's favor.
FOSS Patents 
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Who won?
2/28/2012 11:32:48 AM
The victory is that the new offer from Apple was not acceptable to Motorola, since it was much less than they had demanded. The court overruled Motorola's refusal of Apple's offer.
You're right to some extent though in that Motorola does still get it's fair licensing - and so they should. The only reason it even came to be a legal case was because Motorola wanted
it's fair licensing.
Legal system has done its job in ensuring that the license was fair.
"We are going to continue to work with them to make sure they understand the reality of the Internet. A lot of these people don't have Ph.Ds, and they don't have a degree in computer science." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis
German Lawsuit Loss Forces Apple to Cut Verboten iPad, iPhone Feature
February 24, 2012, 11:08 AM
Motorola Demanded $22.50 Per Windows Laptop, Microsoft Complains to EU
February 23, 2012, 4:30 PM
Analysis: Neonode Patented Swipe-to-Unlock 3 Years Before Apple
February 20, 2012, 12:49 PM
Google Now Has Two New Unlock Patent Applications to Counter Apple's IP
February 17, 2012, 8:50 PM
German Judge Bans Androids for Swipe-Unlocking, Despite Prior Art
February 16, 2012, 7:11 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information