Print 68 comment(s) - last by Spuke.. on Feb 28 at 5:03 PM

Bill Ford Jr.  (Source:
Ford said as the population increases, auto sales will increase, but congested highways will prevent us from traveling/commuting

At the Mobile World Congress (MWC) conference today, Bill Ford Jr. addressed his concern regarding future auto congestion in urban areas, which he says could eventually threaten our freedom to commute.

Bill Ford Jr. is the great-grandson of Henry Ford, who founded Ford Motor Company on June 16, 1903. Before the introduction of the Ford Model T in 1908, many people did not travel more than 25 miles from home. However, having an automobile made further travels possible -- it gave them freedom.

But Bill Ford Jr. said this freedom could be at risk due to increased population, which means increased auto sales and congested highways that could one day limit the number of automobiles that can be sold or used on the roads at a given time.

"What I'm really worried about is the role of the car in the long-term," said Ford. "If we do nothing, it will limit the number of vehicles we can sell. If we can solve this problem of urban mobility, I think there's a great business opportunity for us."

According to LMC Automotive, a consulting firm in Michigan, there are currently 1.2 billion vehicles on the roads globally.

While issues like the environmental impact of vehicles have already been addressed via efforts like the Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) proposal that intends to boost fleet wide fuel economy to 54.5 mpg by 2025, Ford is moving on to other issues that are not so close to being addressed. His issue of choice is what to do about future traffic jams once the population increases, and urges the mobile technology industry to take action in developing solutions.

Ford already has a few solutions in mind, and they're all communications-based answers. Some are currently being developed, and some are not. For instance, Ford sees cars having radar-based cruise control and blind-spot monitoring systems in five years that allow vehicles to communicate with one another. These systems are currently being developed, where vehicles can "talk" to each other, offering information like the speed of another vehicle nearby. This could potentially avoid fatal crashes. Toyota is just one automaker that discussed the introduction of smart road technology back in 2010. Others like Ford and General Motors have worked to offer better and smarter safety systems as well, but they're mostly crash-based instead of traffic congestion-based.

Ford envisions a future beyond 2025 where cars will drive themselves as close together as possible to use the maximum amount of space on a highway. Vehicles will also do the same in parking lots to make more room for others. In addition, he imagines automakers building smaller cars that can offer additional space for other drivers.

"Even if the technology is there, there's still going to have to be tremendous thought by urban planners," said Ford. "That [driving] freedom has been threatened unless we redefine what personal mobility can be in a congested urbanized world."

Source: The Detroit News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Urban mobility...
By tayb on 2/27/2012 1:01:39 PM , Rating: 2
You know that they build apartments that are large right? You could buy an apartment in downtown NYC that is several thousand square feet. But you'll pay for it.

RE: Urban mobility...
By FITCamaro on 2/27/2012 1:16:57 PM , Rating: 1
Well when you want to give all of us several million dollars, we'll care about that option.

RE: Urban mobility...
By JediJeb on 2/27/2012 1:59:41 PM , Rating: 2
But can you get those for less than the $42K I paid for my 800sqft cabin on 3 acres?

RE: Urban mobility...
By Motoman on 2/27/2012 7:27:09 PM , Rating: 1
Define "large."

The wife and I share a 3,300sf house on 50 acres of land, close to half of which is our own private forest. Our place also features a WWII-era barn of about 2,000sf, a cute old "milk house" which is something silly like 150sf, another building that we've converted to a "clubhouse" that's about 2,000sf, and a modern horse barn with attached arena that's probably somewhere in the neighborhood of 5,000sf.

I can keep the dozen or so motorcycles I have at any given time there with no problem, along with our 6 horses and boarding many more. We can park my truck, the wife's SUV, our horse trailer and my race trailer anywhere we want.

Our monthly payments are $3,100. So what could I get in NYC that would be comparable to that for $3,100 a month? A 1,200sf apartment and no parking space?


RE: Urban mobility...
By Spuke on 2/28/2012 4:48:06 PM , Rating: 2
I don't even think you could get 1200sf for that price in NYC. BTW, nice setup. We have 2.5 acres, a couple of horses, 2100sf house, probably 800sf 3 stall shedrow barn, an arena and round pen. Our monthly payments are $2400. We sold a horse a couple of years ago to a couple from Calabasas. They were amazed at the cost of housing in our area. They said our home would easily be worth $8 million in their area (and Calabasas is still relatively rural but only 20 mins or so from LA) as opposed to 1.5 hours (or more..traffic) for us. Even if we got the same setup just 30 mins down the road almost doubles the price.

No thanks.

"If you mod me down, I will become more insightful than you can possibly imagine." -- Slashdot

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki