German Lawsuit Loss Forces Apple to Cut Verboten iPad, iPhone Feature
February 24, 2012 11:08 AM
comment(s) - last by
Push-email is likely gone from the iCloud for at least a year
It is a small thing. But as Apple, Inc. (
) well knows, it is the little things that sell a product.
I. Bye Bye Bye
proudly unveiled the iCloud
in mid-2011. The service offers photo streaming, documents "in the cloud", automated backups, and push email/calendar/contacts. Well, for Germany, Europe's third largest tablet and smartphone market, the good times are over, as the push email functionality is officially banned.
After new Google Inc. (
secured a preliminary injunction
just weeks ago in German court, Apple failed to convince a judge to inflate the bond. As a result, Motorola paid the bond to carry through with the ban. Some sources are estimating that bond could have cost around €100M ($134.1M USD).
The iCloud's core push-email is verboten in Germany. [Image Source: 9 to 5 Mac]
Left with little recourse, Apple was left doing the same thing it had forced Android phonemakers to do -- remove features. To recap, Apple has already forced several Android phonemakers to remove the "bounce" animation from their smartphones, and degrade the quality of scrolling in their gallery. Those concessions come after preliminary injunction losses
in regions such as the Netherlands
. And in Germany Apple has even
banned Motorola and Samsung
Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
) from using
, forcing them to use a clunky spiral motion unlock screen.
to its German fans the bad news:
Due to recent patent litigation by Motorola Mobility, iCloud and MobileMe users are currently unable to have iCloud and MobileMe email pushed to their iOS devices while located within the borders of Germany.
Affected customers will still receive iCloud and MobileMe email, but new messages will be downloaded to their devices when the Mail app is opened, or when their device periodically fetches new messages as configured in iOS Settings. Push email service on desktop computers, laptop computers, and the web is unaffected, as is service from other providers such as Microsoft Exchange ActiveSync.
Apple believes Motorola's patent is invalid and is appealing the decision.
Apple's calendar and contacts syncing will continue to function as normal in iCloud and MobileMe, despite the loss of push email.
II. Why Was the iCloud Feature Banned, and What Is Next?
The device maker faces an uphill struggle from here on out. Like many of Apple's patents that it's litigated with, Motorola's push email patent may be invalid due to prior art or other issues (novelty, etc.).
In the U.S., a lower federal courts judges can ban a product or service via preliminary injunction if they feel that:
a) The described product or service clearly violates the patent
b) There is
a "high likelihood" that a patent is invalid.
The German court system works slightly differently, but the end result is the same. In Germany infringement proceeds along one track, while validity proceeds along a second, parallel track [source]. A judge can pause (stay) the infringement proceedings to wait for the conclusion of the validity, but only if there
a "high likelihood" of their validity.
Again, both systems rely on the premise of a "high likelihood" of invalidity, which is typically defined at somewhere around 70 to 80 percent. Of course this is wholly subjective, meaning how one judge might rule could vary substantially from what another judge might rule.
For now Apple's iPads and iPhones have been crippled of a key feature, much as Apple has crippled its competitors. Apple's next soonest hope of killing the painful ruling comes when it pleads its case before the
Düsseldorf Higher Regional Court
, a German appeals court. The appeals court has a lower standard of invalidity to grant a stay -- it can grant a stay if it feels that there's over a 50 percent chance of invalidity.
iPhone owners must live with the ban, likely for at least a year. [Image Source: Tech Axcess]
However, the issue for Apple is that the appeals court likely won't hear the case for at least a year -- ironically, a delay which may in part be lengthened due to all the appeals Apple has generated in its its own injunction
over Android phonemakers. And, of course, there's no guarantees that the appeals court will even see the patent as 50 percent or more likely to be invalid.
The Android v. Apple patent dispute is increasingly looking like a stalemate of growing attrition. Everyone is losing -- especially the customers -- as features disappear from both sides' products. And there's little sign that the leadership on either side is willing to offer an end to the conflict.
The higher invalidity standard is in major contrast with other EU nations, such as the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.
The push-email patent used in this case is
a patent promised under the "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) rules. Thus, unlike
some other recent rulings
-- such as a German ban on online iPad/iPhone sales -- Motorola stands no risk of
getting in trouble for FRAND abuse
for its effort (as, again, the patent is not FRAND).
The patent involved in this ruling is
EP (European Patent) 0847654 (B1)
. The U.S. counterpart:
U.S. Patent No. 5,754,119
, which covers a "multiple pager status synchronization system and method".
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
2/27/2012 11:12:49 AM
If you werent so narrow, you might see that it isnt OK. But Apple started it.
If I am against violence, and you punch someone in the face for no good reason, and then they punch you back, I will speak out against you. I don't agree that punching you back was a good course of action, but that fact is you startyed it and you deserve it. That is all this is about.
If I am incorrect and Apple didnt start all of this legal non-sense and Google, Samsung, HTC or Moto did, then I I would very much like to see links showing proof. It all must be available, legal cases have dates. If that is the case I will humbly apologize.
2/27/2012 1:23:52 PM
I can't say I have a tremendous background in the history of mobile related legal actions but this site (which is an anti-software patent site by the way)
seems to show that the first post iPhone legal action was when Nokia sued Apple in October 2009.
Apple filed suit against HTC Corporation, in March 2010 in the USA.
In early October 2010, Motorola started the legal con flict with Apple when it accused Apple of infringing 18 patents and filed suit in the USA in Northern Illinois and Southern Florida federal district courts.
On the 30th October, Apple filed a counter-suit in the USA,initially listing 12 patents allegedly infringed, and later amending the suit to list 24 patents.
So the pattern seems to be Nokia sued first and sued Apple, Apple sued HTC first, Motorola sued Apple first and Apple sued Samsung first.
I think the idea that the whole patent war over mobile was started by Apple is simplistic.
Personally I think the mobile patent war is peaking and will decline over the next few years. It probably won't change much but I think Apple stands a good chance of achieving their strategic legal aim which is to deter copying of their designs or OS features.
The legal wars won't much affect the market situation - Apple will continue to make the most profits and make the best selling handset and will continue to grow strongly. Samsung will continue to be the only serious competitor to Apple and one of the few Android licensees who actually make any money from Android. I will be surprised if WP7 gets any traction in the market but stranger things have happened.
2/27/2012 2:40:36 PM
"Personally I think the mobile patent war is peaking and will decline over the next few years"
I agree, it likely will end. Highly doubtful that Apple will win, but I agree it will end. In the end it will accomplish nothing.
Anyhow, as far as Nokia. I don't know, they haven't been in any conversation going on here as they aren't an Android maker. And as far as Apple Android lawsuits, It still looks like Apple is copying far more than being copied and suing far more than being sued. Good luck with that.
Agreed that Apple will continue to be strong, wealthy and have massive sales. Good. They deserve it based on theri products, NOT on their lawsuits.
"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)
Motorola Demanded $22.50 Per Windows Laptop, Microsoft Complains to EU
February 23, 2012, 4:30 PM
Analysis: Neonode Patented Swipe-to-Unlock 3 Years Before Apple
February 20, 2012, 12:49 PM
German Judge Bans Androids for Swipe-Unlocking, Despite Prior Art
February 16, 2012, 7:11 PM
Google is Now (Almost) the Proud Owner of Motorola After EU/U.S. Approval
February 14, 2012, 11:40 AM
Motorola Fails to Score the Hat Trick, Losing to Apple at Last in Germany
February 10, 2012, 1:15 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information