Philips Wins $10M USD Gov't L-Prize for World's Most Efficient Light Bulb
February 27, 2012 10:54 AM
comment(s) - last by
Bulb will debut at $50; nobody said "perfection" was cheap
Nearly four years have passed since the
U.S. Department of Energy
(DOE) announced the "
", a $20M USD reward to the first company who successfully produced a
light-emitting diode (LED) bulb
meeting a special set of criteria in terms of energy efficiency and lighting performance. The prize took money from allocations made by the
Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) of 2007
, signed into law by former President George W. Bush.
I. Koninklijke Philips Wins the L Prize
The years have passed and at last there is a winner. The prize has been awarded to a design from Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (
), an Amsterdam, Netherlands-based global electronics company.
The winning design is dubbed the "Philips Award Winning LED Bulb". Its specs easily meet the L Prize criteria:
A video on the testing process is seen below:
The Philips bulb survived all the tests, emerging with flying colors. It did particularly well in longevity testing, showing almost no performance degradation after predicted at 25,000 hours (1041 days, or almost 3 years of continuous operation).
II. For $50 is the L Prize Bulb Worth It?
The bulb trims over 2.5W off Philip's previous generation LED bulb designs, a power savings of roughly 20 percent. Unfortunately those savings come at a cost -- where as Philip's previous generation models are retailing for
around $33 USD
, the new bulb retails for $49.95 USD, nearly 50% more expensive. The bulb is assembled in the U.S. from components manufactured in Shenzhen, China with LED chips made in San Jose, Calif.
Philips Professional Luminaires CEO Zia Eftekhar (left) and Philips Lighting North America CEO Ed Crawford accept the L-Prize award from Dr. Arun Majumdar, a senior DOE official.
[Image Source: DOE/Koninklijke Philips]
The pricey bulb has a 29 percent wall-plug efficiency ratio -- compared to the 60W incandescent lamp’s 12% and a CFL’s 19% wall-plug efficiency. The new design delivers 90 lm/W (an efficiency measure) –compared to an average 60W incandescent with about 13 lm/W or a CFL with about 53 lm/W.
Detailed information about its color and luminosity performance is available
[PDF], direct from Philips.
The bulb carries a distinct yellowish hue when powered off, but Philips assures that the "remote phosphor" (yellow) disappears when the bulb is powered on. The emitted light is white with a slightly yellowish hue (as with the standard off-the-shelf incandescent bulbs).
The L-Prize winning bulb design [Image Source: Koninklijke Philips]
Philips is offering a 3-year warranty on the bulb. And it rates it at 30,000+ hours of life.
Given a $0.10 USD per kWH cost of electricity -- a "middle of the road" scenario in the U.S. [
] -- the bulb would save approximately $150 USD over its lifetime ($0.10 USD/kWh * 3e4 h * 0.050 kW) versus an incandescent design. However, the additional 2.5 watts of power savings over previous generation models only represents approximately $7.50 USD more in savings.
Aside from the cost savings, the LED lights also offer smoother dimming than incandescent bulbs, with less impact on longevity. And unlike
compact fluorescent lighbulbs
(CFLs), a rival energy efficient design, they lack
toxic compounds like mercury
Thus the bulb may be sought after by LED lighting enthusiasts, but will likely be overlooked by businesses, which would tend to prefer cheaper, more mature LED designs. However, the technology should eventually fall into line with current generation models price-wise, offering the best of both worlds.
We're still a long way from the promises of some LED researchers --
a 60-year light bulb that costs $2.85 USD
-- but the industry is starting to get to the point where LED lighting makes sense for businesses and consumers from a financial perspective.
You can order the bulb from various sources,
such as Light Bulb Emporium
. It should ship in March.
For its win, Philips receives $10M USD, and free promotion from the DOE. The DOE still has more money to give to other L-Prize winners.
Be careful when browsing sites or shops looking for this bulb as there's many different models out here. Note this is the <10 W Endura series model. This should not be confused with the last-gen 12.5W Endura series model (linked above) or the (last-gen) 8W Ambient Light series.
While the bulb design was an international effort based on the multi-national Koninklijke Philips company, the award winning design was submitted by Philips Lighting North America, who will be producing and marketing the bulb in the U.S.
Light Bulb Emporium [order]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: I would buy this over CCFL any time.
3/3/2012 12:29:43 PM
No. In theory, in practice, and factually speaking, LEDs all degrade in light output. "IF" philips has actually made one that maintains 99.3% luminous flux over 25K hours, this alone is most impressive of any spec because I doubt even the LED manufacturer claims this high.
It makes me wonder about the power supply too. They could supply *perfect* power for the test, instead of real world power with spikes and noise from other electrical appliances particularly those with motors like a refrigerator compressor.
You have no reason to believe it will last much longer, in fact based on science and available data there is every reason to believe most won't achieve the results stated by the data. It makes me wonder if these bulbs were cherry picked for the test. Go look at LED datasheets, they contradict the idea of infinite LED lifespan.
Who really cares about cold start performance? Are you posing some end of the world scenario where it might save your life if your bulb is 50% brighter within the first few seconds it is on? Most CFL bulbs are plenty bright enough by the time your eyes have adjusted to the sudden light increase.
I find your "good for the environment" claim a bit dubious too unless they are made with 100% recyclable materials AND they commit to, and actually do, recycle them all at no cost to the customer.
To be fair that could mean "less bad for the environment" instead if it were an ideal world but it is not - presently there are places you can recycle CFL bulbs, but where can you ACTUALLY recycle this bulb? In the real world we can't assume this bulb won't go into a landfill while the CFL can be recycled.
“So far we have not seen a single Android device that does not infringe on our patents." -- Microsoft General Counsel Brad Smith
Calif. Discovers Fluorescent Lightbulbs Burning Out Faster Than Predicted
January 25, 2011, 4:23 PM
New Near-Production "Super" Lightbulb Lasts 60 Years, Costs $2.85
January 29, 2009, 4:00 PM
A Brave New LED World
December 15, 2007, 11:12 PM
Australia Makes Move From Incandescent to Fluorescent Lighting
February 21, 2007, 9:19 AM
Creationists are Mad About Google Doodle Depicting Evolution
November 24, 2015, 8:48 PM
DHS and TSA: Whoops, We Missed That 73 Airport Employees May be Terrorists
November 19, 2015, 2:16 PM
Star Wars Spinoff Film "Rogue One", Theme Park Attractions Announced
August 17, 2015, 12:20 PM
SpaceX Falcon 9's Seventh Supply Mission to ISS Ends w/ Fiery Stage 1 Explosion
June 28, 2015, 1:10 PM
Cool Science Video: Glowing Millipede Prowls the Nevada Desert
May 18, 2015, 12:00 PM
Newly Discovered Costa Rican Glass Frog is Kermit's Doppelgänger
April 22, 2015, 11:26 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information