First-Ever 'Distracted Driving' Guidelines Issued by NHTSA
February 17, 2012 9:55 AM
comment(s) - last by
Automakers would have to rethink the kind of electronic devices and the number of these devices used within a vehicle
The first guidelines for
reducing distracted driving
were proposed by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood yesterday, where automakers would be challenged to cut the number of in-vehicle entertainment and information electronics.
"Distracted driving is a dangerous and deadly habit on America's roadways -- that's why I've made it a priority to encourage people to stay focused behind the wheel," said LaHood. "These guidelines are a major step forward in identifying real solutions to tackle the issue of distracted driving for drivers of all ages."
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued the new guidelines, which are the very first of their kind. They aim to offer recommended criteria for the kind of electronic devices and the number of these devices used within a vehicle.
The proposed guidelines are currently in Phase l, which applies to light vehicles like cars, pickup trucks, minivans and SUVs. Phase l recommends guidelines that help automakers use electronics that are less likely to distract the driver with tasks that are not associated with the operation of the vehicle, and the use of electronics that won't require the driver's sight and touch for long periods of time.
The exact guidelines for Phase l include the following: reduce complexity and task length required by the device; limit individual off-road glances required for device operation to no more than two seconds in duration; limit device operation to one hand only; limit the amount of manual inputs required for device operation, and limit unnecessary visual information in the driver's field of view.
The Phase l guidelines also recommend that certain in-vehicle features be disabled to the driver, except when the car is in park: visual-manual text messaging; visual-manual social media browsing; visual-manual Internet browsing; visual-manual
10-digit phone dialing
; visual-manual navigation system destination entry by address, and the display of more than 30 characters of text to the driver that is unrelated to driving the vehicle.
NHTSA is already looking ahead to Phase ll and Phase lll guidelines, which will take an in-depth look at electronics that are distractions in vehicles, yet not part of the vehicles, like smartphones and tablets. Phase lll is expected to look into voice-activated controls.
LaHood is known for his support for ridding distracted driving, but said he isn't looking to ban electronics in vehicles entirely. Back in December 2011, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
pushed for a ban on hands-free calls while driving
in order to reduce distracted driving, and LaHood said he wouldn't back it.
United States Department of Transportation
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Consolidate controls
2/18/2012 3:48:16 PM
What we need are personal monorail cars. Forget roads, they take up too much space and have a very negative environmental impact. We can have more economical and safer travel, while maintaining our individuality. Why do we need cars? Answer: We don't. For those who still want to drive, there are always race tracks. People are too afraid of change, the railroad was met with the same fear and doubt - but it helped bring industrialization to America. Of course, that had a very negative impact upon the environment. A modern monorail would have a very positive impact. Roads are horrible. Just think of all the animals killed, the hazardous waste leaked off of wrecked vehicles and chemical trucks, and the tires and oil leaked, tossed, burned everywhere...
Want to get rid of foreign oil? Modern magnetic levitation monorail. There's your answer.
RE: Consolidate controls
2/20/2012 10:31:46 AM
I assume this was a joke, but here is my response anyways.
The biggest issue I see with that is the 1mil per person cost to build all of it. Those tracks, trains, etc need to be paid for by somebody, and with the government already running such a huge deficit, I just don't see how it would even be possible.
Why not just go for jet packs or transporters (ala star trek!). Either would be just as likely to get done.
"Google fired a shot heard 'round the world, and now a second American company has answered the call to defend the rights of the Chinese people." -- Rep. Christopher H. Smith (R-N.J.)
NTSB Looks to Ban Hands-Free Calls, Transportation Secretary LaHood Isn't Supporting It
December 22, 2011, 9:24 AM
Ford Lets Parents Ban Teens' In-Car Calls
October 28, 2011, 12:06 AM
Chicago Driver Allegedly Kills Pedestrian While Posting on Facebook
February 18, 2011, 8:41 AM
Ford, Toyota, and Universal Pictures Celebrate "Back to the Future Day' in Style
October 21, 2015, 4:19 PM
Consumer Reports Flexes Muscle, Hits Slumping Tesla Motors Stock
October 20, 2015, 4:13 PM
Debunked: Beneath the Lies, Nigerian "Pee Generator" Is Still Pissing Into the Wind
October 19, 2015, 7:53 PM
Hot Air? President Obama, G7 Pledge to Eliminate Most Fossil Fuel Use by 2100
June 8, 2015, 5:40 PM
Study Predicts Self-Driving Vehicles Could Rake in Billions
March 6, 2015, 8:34 AM
Dual-Motor Tesla Model S P85D's "Insane Mode" Shocks Passengers
January 28, 2015, 11:18 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information