backtop


Print 33 comment(s) - last by Boingo Twang.. on Feb 20 at 1:06 PM


  (Source: intomobile.com)
Automakers would have to rethink the kind of electronic devices and the number of these devices used within a vehicle

The first guidelines for reducing distracted driving were proposed by Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood yesterday, where automakers would be challenged to cut the number of in-vehicle entertainment and information electronics.

"Distracted driving is a dangerous and deadly habit on America's roadways -- that's why I've made it a priority to encourage people to stay focused behind the wheel," said LaHood. "These guidelines are a major step forward in identifying real solutions to tackle the issue of distracted driving for drivers of all ages."

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) issued the new guidelines, which are the very first of their kind. They aim to offer recommended criteria for the kind of electronic devices and the number of these devices used within a vehicle.

The proposed guidelines are currently in Phase l, which applies to light vehicles like cars, pickup trucks, minivans and SUVs. Phase l recommends guidelines that help automakers use electronics that are less likely to distract the driver with tasks that are not associated with the operation of the vehicle, and the use of electronics that won't require the driver's sight and touch for long periods of time.

The exact guidelines for Phase l include the following: reduce complexity and task length required by the device; limit individual off-road glances required for device operation to no more than two seconds in duration; limit device operation to one hand only; limit the amount of manual inputs required for device operation, and limit unnecessary visual information in the driver's field of view.

The Phase l guidelines also recommend that certain in-vehicle features be disabled to the driver, except when the car is in park: visual-manual text messaging; visual-manual social media browsing; visual-manual Internet browsing; visual-manual 10-digit phone dialing; visual-manual navigation system destination entry by address, and the display of more than 30 characters of text to the driver that is unrelated to driving the vehicle.

NHTSA is already looking ahead to Phase ll and Phase lll guidelines, which will take an in-depth look at electronics that are distractions in vehicles, yet not part of the vehicles, like smartphones and tablets. Phase lll is expected to look into voice-activated controls.

LaHood is known for his support for ridding distracted driving, but said he isn't looking to ban electronics in vehicles entirely. Back in December 2011, the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) pushed for a ban on hands-free calls while driving in order to reduce distracted driving, and LaHood said he wouldn't back it.

Source: United States Department of Transportation



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Consolidate controls
By danjw1 on 2/17/2012 11:25:42 AM , Rating: 2
I know but mass production does bring down costs. If you install something in every car you make, you get economies of scale. But yes it will add some to the cost of the car. Really, we just need to take the driver out of the equation, with automated vehicles. :-)


RE: Consolidate controls
By danjw1 on 2/17/2012 11:31:23 AM , Rating: 2
On that last point, Nevada just approved rules for automated vehicles on their roads. This is just for test vehicles, but other states are considering such laws as well. So we may not be that far away.

Personally, I can't wait until I can read my kindle on my drive to work. :-)


RE: Consolidate controls
By jRaskell on 2/17/2012 4:39:20 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
Personally, I can't wait until I can read my kindle on my drive to work. :-)


Sadly, I've seen examples of people that aren't waiting.


RE: Consolidate controls
By JonnyDough on 2/18/2012 3:48:16 PM , Rating: 2
What we need are personal monorail cars. Forget roads, they take up too much space and have a very negative environmental impact. We can have more economical and safer travel, while maintaining our individuality. Why do we need cars? Answer: We don't. For those who still want to drive, there are always race tracks. People are too afraid of change, the railroad was met with the same fear and doubt - but it helped bring industrialization to America. Of course, that had a very negative impact upon the environment. A modern monorail would have a very positive impact. Roads are horrible. Just think of all the animals killed, the hazardous waste leaked off of wrecked vehicles and chemical trucks, and the tires and oil leaked, tossed, burned everywhere...

Want to get rid of foreign oil? Modern magnetic levitation monorail. There's your answer.


RE: Consolidate controls
By Rukkian on 2/20/2012 10:31:46 AM , Rating: 2
I assume this was a joke, but here is my response anyways.

The biggest issue I see with that is the 1mil per person cost to build all of it. Those tracks, trains, etc need to be paid for by somebody, and with the government already running such a huge deficit, I just don't see how it would even be possible.

Why not just go for jet packs or transporters (ala star trek!). Either would be just as likely to get done.


"A politician stumbles over himself... Then they pick it out. They edit it. He runs the clip, and then he makes a funny face, and the whole audience has a Pavlovian response." -- Joe Scarborough on John Stewart over Jim Cramer














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki