Report: Mass Launch of 22 nm Ivy Bridge CPUs is Delayed Until June
February 17, 2012 12:46 PM
comment(s) - last by
Intel hopes to reach full production capacity after a two month delay
Just months ago at the 2011 Intel Developer Forum, executives with the world's largest traditional personal computer chipmaker, Intel Corp. (
all boast and bravado
, saying their competitors were
years behind in process
. Indeed, the talk about the dramatic gains in terms of power efficiency and clock speed using Intel's proprietary
22 nm FinFET 3D-transistor design
sounded very impressive.
But the first chinks in the armor perhaps began to show at the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show, when Intel was
its 22 nm
DirectX 11 demo during
its ultrabook pitch
. Intel brushed off the trickery, but the incident raised some serious questions. If the 22 nm chip was launching in April at production volume and had already been taped out in final form, why would Intel have to use canned video? Why couldn't it show its real product? Why the obfuscation??
that multiple OEM sources have shared that
is being delayed from April to June. While not a huge delay, the report raises questions about whether Intel's 22 nm process is as stable as it claims.
To be fair, the OEMs appear to be claiming that the delay is due to inventories:
Because most first-tier notebook vendors are having trouble digesting their Sandy Bridge notebook inventories due to the weak global economy, while Intel is also troubled by its Sandy Bridge processor inventory, the CPU giant plans to delay mass shipments of the new processors to minimize the impact, the sources noted.
In other words, PCs didn't sell well in 2011, Intel built up a surplus of CPUs, and so it wants to delay its release. This is all very plausible, and indeed lines up with
write-offs found in Intel's earnings reports
But it is also possible that Intel isn't being entirely forthcoming and that
wasn't being delivered at the reliable high volumes it had hoped. And it could very well be a bit of both factors -- too high inventories, and some struggles on the process front.
Regardless, it sounds like customers will have to wait on
, a bit.
That's good news for the competition. AMD hopes to
aggressively roll out its
accelerated processing units (APUs)
later this year. The chips are built on a 32 nm process (GlobalFoundries), but still aim to be competitive with
in terms of power consumption and graphics performance. AMD is gambling that the CPU will lose, processing speed-wise, to
, but be "good enough" for most consumers.
APU (center) will launch later this year and aggressively target would-be Intel
buyers by offering improved graphics and power efficiency at a lower price. [Image Source: Jason Mick/DailyTech]
AMD hopes to price its chip + chipset package at
hundreds of dollars beneath Intel
. Where as Intel is targeting systems $700 and up, AMD has stated to us that
systems will retail for $500 or less.
Strong 2011 APU sales
of AMD's initial swing at this strategy made it look like a home run.
Likewise, ARM CPU makers, including Qualcomm, Inc. (
looking to invade laptops and compact desktops
late this year, with the introduction of 28 nm ARM CPUs
Microsoft Corp.'s (
new Windows 8
]. The Q4 2012 devices are expected to follow a strategy similar to AMD's -- strong power efficiency at a low price.
The delay is also good news for third party USB 3.0 chipmakers like Renesas Electronics Corp. (
), ASMedia Technology Inc., and Etron Ltd. As
was the first Intel chip to
include on-die USB 3.0 support
, it was expected to render these competitors' designs obsolete. But now, they have been bought a bit more time.
Intel's core hope in terms of maintaining its dominant position is to beat the competition in process, and trickle down its process improvements into its budget models, mitigating cost and architectural disadvantages. Intel has made big promises [
] regarding Atom-powered smartphones, but without 22 nm technology it appears to be
forgoing any sort of big mobile push
in 2012. The longer it waits, the more advantage it gives to the hungry rivals. Intel should hope that the delay does not set back its very aggressive 22 nm Atom rollout.
MaximumPC [faked Intel Demo]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Lack of competition from AMD?
2/18/2012 2:41:26 AM
Lol. That real is Ignorant
Think Of what people want, People want a Laptop that can do everything at a cheap price and a long battery life. I very much Doubt people will want to pay +$200 for the same thing.
DW Many people are already saying to buy AMD Stock and almost every website has moved it off Hold/neutral to Buy (Unlike poor NVIDIA)
When i think of the General Public i think we should really include Light gaming, Your right in saying if someone wanted a gaming a laptop you would go Intel + an ATI(AMD) or NVIDIA Card. but really, Who needs that anymore.
Most people here think Intel = Best because of name. Not so, Think of 2006. Back when AMD was on top. Intel was in a bad way, Then all of a sudden they pretty much mopped the floor with AMD with their new Architecture. Now it's on the other foot, Intel has been ignoring AMD and going Mobile, AMD has a new architecture. A university already made the Fusion core's performance go up by 20% by moving one function from the CPU Part to the GPU part. Mate, Trinity > Ivy Bridge this time round, Sorry to say
Oh if you want the best gaming around, Im pretty sure the best Graphics card at the moment is AMD anyways (7970) ;)
RE: Lack of competition from AMD?
2/19/2012 5:44:34 AM
I, and plenty of others, pay $300 extra for a GTX580M over an equivalent performance 6990M because of reliability, better drivers, and slightly improved battery life (the 6990M's memory doesn't clock down in any but the lowest power idle mode meaning it suffers in light usage scenarios e.g. HW accelerated flash)
What on earth does the 7970's moment in the sun before Kepler comes out and trounces it have to do with AMD's CPUs being far inferior to Intel's...
If you want to look at where CPU/GPU integration has the best prospects versus current products - it's in a market where AMD isn't - smartphones and tablets.
RE: Lack of competition from AMD?
2/19/2012 5:47:56 AM
lol, just saw this link
"It seems as though my state-funded math degree has failed me. Let the lashings commence." -- DailyTech Editor-in-Chief Kristopher Kubicki
AMD Concedes Die-Shrink Race to Intel, Considers ARM Cores
February 6, 2012, 11:45 AM
AMD Plunges Back in the Red, Posts Gloomy Outlook
January 25, 2012, 12:42 PM
CES 2012: Prepare for Sub-$500 Ultrathins: AMD's Fusion Trinity, Pictured
January 15, 2012, 12:15 PM
ARM and Intel Talk Trash About Each Others' Chances
January 13, 2012, 11:45 PM
CES 2012: Qualcomm Says 70+ Snapdragon 4 Designs Incoming
January 11, 2012, 7:50 PM
Laptop or Tablet - Which Do You Prefer?
September 20, 2016, 6:32 AM
Microsoft Surface Pro 3 - Battery Issue Fixed
August 30, 2016, 6:30 AM
First Apple Computer Auctions for $815,000
August 27, 2016, 7:51 AM
Lenovo vs. Asus vs. HP - Best Laptop Under $500.00
August 19, 2016, 4:00 AM
Best Router for Your Home Network (Under $200.00)
August 6, 2016, 9:51 PM
5 Top Rated Printers for Home or Small Office
July 29, 2016, 10:44 PM
Most Popular Articles
Smartphone Screen Protectors – What To Look For
September 21, 2016, 9:33 AM
UN Meeting to Tackle Antimicrobial Resistance
September 21, 2016, 9:52 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM
5 Cases for iPhone 7 and 7 iPhone Plus
September 18, 2016, 10:08 AM
Update: Problem-Free Galaxy Note7s CPSC Approved
September 22, 2016, 5:30 AM
Latest Blog Posts
Burlington Gun Attack
Sep 27, 2016, 5:00 AM
Who is in Risk of Getting Oral Cancer?
Sep 23, 2016, 6:02 AM
France Bans Plastic Eating Utensils in Restaurants
Sep 18, 2016, 10:49 AM
Progress Against Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Sep 17, 2016, 5:30 AM
Apple Watch Series 2 - Number 1 in the Customer Satisfaction.
Sep 7, 2016, 6:19 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information