Report: Mass Launch of 22 nm Ivy Bridge CPUs is Delayed Until June
February 17, 2012 12:46 PM
comment(s) - last by
Intel hopes to reach full production capacity after a two month delay
Just months ago at the 2011 Intel Developer Forum, executives with the world's largest traditional personal computer chipmaker, Intel Corp. (
all boast and bravado
, saying their competitors were
years behind in process
. Indeed, the talk about the dramatic gains in terms of power efficiency and clock speed using Intel's proprietary
22 nm FinFET 3D-transistor design
sounded very impressive.
But the first chinks in the armor perhaps began to show at the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show, when Intel was
its 22 nm
DirectX 11 demo during
its ultrabook pitch
. Intel brushed off the trickery, but the incident raised some serious questions. If the 22 nm chip was launching in April at production volume and had already been taped out in final form, why would Intel have to use canned video? Why couldn't it show its real product? Why the obfuscation??
that multiple OEM sources have shared that
is being delayed from April to June. While not a huge delay, the report raises questions about whether Intel's 22 nm process is as stable as it claims.
To be fair, the OEMs appear to be claiming that the delay is due to inventories:
Because most first-tier notebook vendors are having trouble digesting their Sandy Bridge notebook inventories due to the weak global economy, while Intel is also troubled by its Sandy Bridge processor inventory, the CPU giant plans to delay mass shipments of the new processors to minimize the impact, the sources noted.
In other words, PCs didn't sell well in 2011, Intel built up a surplus of CPUs, and so it wants to delay its release. This is all very plausible, and indeed lines up with
write-offs found in Intel's earnings reports
But it is also possible that Intel isn't being entirely forthcoming and that
wasn't being delivered at the reliable high volumes it had hoped. And it could very well be a bit of both factors -- too high inventories, and some struggles on the process front.
Regardless, it sounds like customers will have to wait on
, a bit.
That's good news for the competition. AMD hopes to
aggressively roll out its
accelerated processing units (APUs)
later this year. The chips are built on a 32 nm process (GlobalFoundries), but still aim to be competitive with
in terms of power consumption and graphics performance. AMD is gambling that the CPU will lose, processing speed-wise, to
, but be "good enough" for most consumers.
APU (center) will launch later this year and aggressively target would-be Intel
buyers by offering improved graphics and power efficiency at a lower price. [Image Source: Jason Mick/DailyTech]
AMD hopes to price its chip + chipset package at
hundreds of dollars beneath Intel
. Where as Intel is targeting systems $700 and up, AMD has stated to us that
systems will retail for $500 or less.
Strong 2011 APU sales
of AMD's initial swing at this strategy made it look like a home run.
Likewise, ARM CPU makers, including Qualcomm, Inc. (
looking to invade laptops and compact desktops
late this year, with the introduction of 28 nm ARM CPUs
Microsoft Corp.'s (
new Windows 8
]. The Q4 2012 devices are expected to follow a strategy similar to AMD's -- strong power efficiency at a low price.
The delay is also good news for third party USB 3.0 chipmakers like Renesas Electronics Corp. (
), ASMedia Technology Inc., and Etron Ltd. As
was the first Intel chip to
include on-die USB 3.0 support
, it was expected to render these competitors' designs obsolete. But now, they have been bought a bit more time.
Intel's core hope in terms of maintaining its dominant position is to beat the competition in process, and trickle down its process improvements into its budget models, mitigating cost and architectural disadvantages. Intel has made big promises [
] regarding Atom-powered smartphones, but without 22 nm technology it appears to be
forgoing any sort of big mobile push
in 2012. The longer it waits, the more advantage it gives to the hungry rivals. Intel should hope that the delay does not set back its very aggressive 22 nm Atom rollout.
MaximumPC [faked Intel Demo]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Lack of competition from AMD?
2/17/2012 3:20:29 PM
If AMD had something that competed, Intel would have been more than happy to write off excess inventory to roll out something that would stomp them.
RE: Lack of competition from AMD?
2/20/2012 8:10:05 AM
And even with this, AMD still beats out Intel in terms of overall quality of laptops and even desktops in the low end of the market(<=$520). Yes, Intel is ahead in terms of CPU design, but Intel GPU technology is FAR FAR behind, and have you ever noticed how many problems there are with Intel based networking due primarily to poor drivers?
Since we have GPU acceleration in web browsers and Flash(yes, people around HERE hate Flash, but it is still a huge part of the web right now and normal consumers don't share the dislike of it). This makes GPU power important, so all those systems with Intel graphics end up not looking like they are so much better, even with faster CPUs in them.
This is why the AMD A6 and A8 based machines really do sell well, not because they are the fastest in terms of CPU power, but because they ARE competitive on a system level in terms of price/performance/features.
RE: Lack of competition from AMD?
2/21/2012 5:12:54 AM
I think they are talking about the 3930k and 3960x
wouldn't be surprised in not selling much cause of the price tag and the fact the 2500k-2700k is good enough for gaming
I shut HT off on my 4.9ghz 2600k and everything felt Worse
3930k is $599 plus you need a $200+ motherboard when you can get a 2600k for like $300 and a $150 motherboard, it's not really ideal cause someone who is on a budget can get other parts better with the difference saved for same cpu consumer non developer/renderer performance
"Intel is investing heavily (think gazillions of dollars and bazillions of engineering man hours) in resources to create an Intel host controllers spec in order to speed time to market of the USB 3.0 technology." -- Intel blogger Nick Knupffer
AMD Concedes Die-Shrink Race to Intel, Considers ARM Cores
February 6, 2012, 11:45 AM
AMD Plunges Back in the Red, Posts Gloomy Outlook
January 25, 2012, 12:42 PM
CES 2012: Prepare for Sub-$500 Ultrathins: AMD's Fusion Trinity, Pictured
January 15, 2012, 12:15 PM
ARM and Intel Talk Trash About Each Others' Chances
January 13, 2012, 11:45 PM
CES 2012: Qualcomm Says 70+ Snapdragon 4 Designs Incoming
January 11, 2012, 7:50 PM
Rosewill Releases 3 New Powerline Networking Adapters
May 21, 2013, 4:29 PM
German Researchers Test 40 Gbps Wireless Broadband
May 21, 2013, 11:01 AM
Qualcomm, Samsung Push AMD to Fourth Place in Processor Market
May 21, 2013, 7:50 AM
Supermicro Looks to Shake Up Server Market
May 20, 2013, 9:00 PM
HiPerGator Supercomputer is Florida's Most Powerful Supercomputer
May 17, 2013, 7:08 AM
5/7/2013 Daily Hardware Reviews
May 7, 2013, 12:02 PM
Most Popular Articles
High School Student Creates Storage Device that Can Charge in 20 Seconds
May 20, 2013, 6:51 AM
Apples Tries to Use Decade-Old Patents to Ban Samsung Galaxy S IV
May 22, 2013, 3:00 PM
NASA Awards $125,000 Grant for 3D Printed Food on Long-Term Space Travels
May 21, 2013, 1:32 PM
Microsoft Announces Voice-Controlled "Xbox One"
May 21, 2013, 12:55 AM
Seawater Cooling Saves Data Center Big Bucks, Energy, Despite Jellyfish Issues
May 17, 2013, 3:23 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Lumosity: Does it Work?
May 22, 2013, 8:20 PM
Quick Note: Sony "Teases" PS4 Ahead of Xbox Reveal in New Video
May 20, 2013, 12:33 PM
Nokia Introduces Instagram-Like App of Its Own to Help Lumia Sales
May 20, 2013, 7:10 AM
Parents of Pre-Teen Drivers Commonly Practice Distracted Driving Says Study
May 9, 2013, 7:16 AM
Apple's iOS 7 Running Into Internal Delays Due to Massive Overhaul
May 1, 2013, 4:26 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2013 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information