Apple Sues Kodak in Manhattan District Court, Takes Advantage of Film Giant's Poor Position
February 15, 2012 12:30 PM
comment(s) - last by
Apple asked a bankruptcy judge if it could file a patent infringement lawsuit against Kodak yesterday
As if repeatedly attacking Samsung, HTC and Motorola Mobility with patent infringement lawsuits wasn't enough, Apple is now looking to kick Kodak while it's down with digital camera, printer and digital picture frame-related infringement suits as well.
Apple's Valentine's Day present to Kodak was a filing in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York yesterday, where Apple said it is filing
claims against Kodak with the International Trade Commission (ITC) as well as the U.S. District Court in Manhattan. Apple asked a bankruptcy judge for permission to sue Kodak first, despite the fact that filing for bankruptcy doesn't protect Kodak from infringement suits.
Apple had claimed before that it created a digital camera in the 1990's along with Kodak, but Kodak supposedly moved ahead with patenting the camera on its own. Apple had filed the case with the U.S. International Trade Commission in Washington, where the ITC rejected Apple's claims. Yesterday, Apple said in the filing that it wanted to move the case to Manhattan.
On January 19, 2012,
Eastman Kodak announced that it had filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection
. The 131-year-old film giant filed in the federal bankruptcy court in the Southern District of New York after mentioning in November 2011 that it would be unable to pay its bills at some point in 2012 unless it stumbled upon some quick cash.
Just last week, Kodak announced that it was also
bailing on the digital camera market
as well as photo frames and pocket video recorders.
Kodak sent a patent infringement lawsuit back Apple's way last month, which also targeted Motorola Mobility. However, Apple argued that the ITC shouldn't even bother with the claims because of Kodak's bankruptcy filing and the sale of its patents. Kodak responded, saying that bankruptcy isn't stopping Kodak from expanding its digital imaging technology.
"Apple should not be using the bankruptcy to seek to disrupt Kodak's enforcement of its patents given that infringers like Apple, who continue to violate Kodak's intellectual property rights and refuse to properly compensate it, have contributed to Kodak's current circumstances," said Kodak.
Apple has been on a lawsuit crusade over the past year, mainly targeting Samsung. In April 2011, Apple began attacking Samsung with several patent infringement lawsuits in regards to the South Korean electronics maker's Galaxy S 4G, Epic 4G, Nexus smartphones and the Galaxy Tab 10.1. Apple claimed that these products imitate the iPhone and iPad.
Apple even successfully banned the Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia and Germany, but Samsung finally
lifted the ban in Australia
in December 2011. Samsung is still having troubles in Germany, however.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
Extremely misleading title
2/15/2012 2:33:48 PM
Kodak sued first and this is the counter suit. This is how corporate lawsuits work. The fact that Kodak has declared bankruptcy in between the legal back and forth is unfortunate for Kodak but it certainly isn't predatory suing by Apple. This is an extremely misleading headline and the article isn't much better. This fact is barely mentioned.
Playing to the audience I suppose. Can't blame a media source for that.
RE: Extremely misleading title
2/15/2012 3:23:05 PM
Actually you can, and should.
RE: Extremely misleading title
2/16/2012 6:28:33 PM
You know, I can't help but think, it just doesn't matter. Given the reputation Apple has developed with it's overwhelming abundance of lawsuits, the headline is completely irrelevant. This is just yet another of the now innumerable 'Oh look, Apples has filed another lawsuit.' I sometimes wonder if Apple's legal department has some internal goal to bring Apple's lawsuit filings inline with their patent filings.
As far as I'm concerned, Apple can reap the reputation it's sowed.
"We can't expect users to use common sense. That would eliminate the need for all sorts of legislation, committees, oversight and lawyers." -- Christopher Jennings
Quick Note: Kodak Bails on Digital Camera Market
February 9, 2012, 12:06 PM
Eastman Kodak Files for Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Protection
January 19, 2012, 9:40 AM
Australian Court Silences Apple's Cries, Allows Samsung Tablet to Launch
December 9, 2011, 1:18 PM
Kodak's Patents Maybe be Worth Five Times the Company's Market Cap.
August 17, 2011, 3:54 PM
Retiree Sues Apple For $7,500 for Wiping Honeymoon Photos From His iPhone
November 30, 2015, 10:23 AM
iPhone 7 May Pack 3-4 GB Memory, More Storage; 4-Inch Comeback is Rumored
November 20, 2015, 10:12 PM
OnePlus One, OnePlus 2 Will Receive Android Marshmallow in Q1 2016
November 16, 2015, 9:58 AM
Lenovo Whoa: Motorola Droid MAXX 2 and Turbo 2 Break Cover in Leaks
October 26, 2015, 3:12 PM
Leak: Apple Preps for First Real Android App Foray With New Apple Music App
October 24, 2015, 1:59 PM
Pepsi Smartphone? Empty Calories Coming Soon to the Midrange
October 12, 2015, 11:41 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information