backtop


Print 29 comment(s) - last by CZroe.. on Feb 15 at 7:41 AM


  (Source: blogcdn.com)
AT&T and Verizon are likely working to boost demand for their ultra-fast LTE networks by offering a new 4G-enabled iPad

As the introduction of the iPad 3 nears, it's iPad-mania as usual. Many are wondering what the new device will feature and what's next in the Apple line of gadgets. The Wall Street Journal has now answered both of those questions, reporting that the iPad 3 will run on 4G networks and that Apple is currently working on an iPad with a smaller screen.

It has been confirmed that AT&T and Verizon Wireless will both sell a version of the iPad 3 that has 4G capabilities. Both AT&T and Verizon are currently the only two carriers who sell the iPad.

At this point, it's uncertain if other carriers like Sprint Nextel Corp. or T-Mobile USA will also sell the new iPad.

AT&T and Verizon are likely working to boost demand for their ultra-fast LTE networks by offering a new 4G-enabled iPad. Carriers typically prefer that customers use LTE networks because they're 50 percent more efficient than 3G networks, according to Verizon. The latest LTE networks are just capable of handling data traffic more easily than 3G networks.

Verizon's LTE network covers approximately 200 million people while AT&T's LTE network covered 74 million people at the end of 2011. AT&T is working to cover 80 percent of the population in 2013.

The iPad 3 will test both carriers' LTE networks come March, as Apple plans to introduce the new gadget at an event during the first week of next month.

In addition to new iPad 3 features trickling into the news, Apple has some other iPad-related plans up its sleeve. According to The Wall Street Journal, Apple is working on creating an iPad with a smaller screen.

The iPad and iPad 2 both rocked a 9.7-inch screen. While the iPad 2 was about 33 percent thinner and 15 percent lighter than the original, the screen size remained the same. This was likely because former Apple CEO Steve Jobs once said that the 9.7-inch screen was the smallest possible size required to house top-of-the-line apps.

However, other tablet makers have proved otherwise. For instance, Samsung sells its Galaxy Tab in three different screen sizes, including 7 inches, 8.9 inches and 10.1 inches. Also, Amazon's Kindle Fire tablet has a 7-inch screen and has become one of the most popular tablets on the market (likely because of the $199 price tag, but the ultra-portable 7-inch feature hasn't generated any criticism either).

With competitors making smaller-screen options for customers, it appears Apple may be working to do the same. The tech giant is currently collaborating with component suppliers in Asia to test an 8-inch iPad.

For now, many reports are saying that the iPad 3 will have the same 9.7-inch screen as the previous two, but an 8-inch version could make an appearance later on. A smaller iPad could potentially make the device a bit more affordable and competitive with the likes of the $199 Kindle Fire, making the purchase of an iPad a more attainable effort.

Sources: The Wall Street Journal, The Wall Street Journal



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Rolling over in his grave...
By PrinceGaz on 2/14/2012 11:47:22 AM , Rating: 2
Personally I'm very happy with the existing 3.5" Apple tablet, aka the iPod touch. A slightly larger screen would be nice but definitely nowhere near as big as the 10" version which is the only other option currently available from Apple.

Something in between makes sense, like 7-8" if you don't want to lug around a 10" sized device, and 5" or so if you want a slightly larger screen than that of the iTouch that can still fit in a jacket pocket. Apple should fill those gaps in its range asap before someone else does (excluding those who already have).


RE: Rolling over in his grave...
By PrinceGaz on 2/14/2012 11:48:33 AM , Rating: 2
Sorry for the double post, there should be a delete option here.


RE: Rolling over in his grave...
By Solandri on 2/14/2012 12:10:05 PM , Rating: 3
It's been ~30 years since Usenet and BBSes showed up, and nearly 20 years since the first web forums were made. You would think someone would've come up with a script which searches for the previous post from a user, compares it to the newly submitted post, and if it's identical rejects it for being a dupe.

Hey! Maybe I should patent that. =p


By geddarkstorm on 2/14/2012 12:59:42 PM , Rating: 2
Are you ready to be a billionaire?


RE: Rolling over in his grave...
By theapparition on 2/14/2012 1:10:18 PM , Rating: 2
Most of the forums I'm on will do exactly that. It will block posts in quick succession (for both user double click error and spam bots) and will also block identical posts from a user to the same forum for X period of time.

DailyTech is the only quasi forum I use that doesn't use the same vBulletin software everyone else does :(


RE: Rolling over in his grave...
By Mitch101 on 2/14/2012 1:47:46 PM , Rating: 2
Craigslist prevents dupes.

My request is still for a e-mail when someone responds to certain posts.


"We don't know how to make a $500 computer that's not a piece of junk." -- Apple CEO Steve Jobs














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki