Print 43 comment(s) - last by Qapa.. on Feb 19 at 11:12 AM

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers asked that some credits be given to automakers that improve technology to meet 2012-2016 requirements

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers approached the Obama Administration earlier this week to request the use of credits to meet the proposed fuel efficiency standards.

Last year, major automakers, the state of California, and the White House agreed on the new Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) proposal that would boost fleet wide fuel economy to 54.5 mpg by 2025. The effort aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and lessen the country's dependency on foreign oil. The new rules also included a mid-term review to make sure that the 2021-2025 requirements are probable, which the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers also addressed this week.

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, which represents Toyota Motor Corp., Detroit's Big Three automakers and eight other automakers, has requested that carmakers obtain some credits for improving technology to meet 2012-2016 requirements set by the new fuel efficiency standards proposal instead of automakers only receiving credits if they are "in use in a minimum percentage of its overall fleet."

"Providing this program feature in the earlier years improves the usefulness of the credit program and encourages manufacturers to introduce the listed technologies sooner," said the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers.

More specifically, the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers would like automakers to obtain some credits for improving active grill shutters, start-stop technology, air conditioning and high efficiency lights for the 2012-2016 technology requirements.

The Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers also asked that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) explain the mid-term evaluation process as well as the specifics that will be reviewed. In addition, automakers want to know that the "timeline and procedures for assuring that the studies relied upon by the agencies are appropriately peer reviewed."

Automakers added that they shouldn't be held responsible for emissions from electricity generation from EVs.

"Automakers may now be called on to not only make an unprecedented investment into vehicles with lower emissions, but to also fill the void between this rulemaking and a comprehensive national energy policy," said the automakers.

The new rules are expected to save drivers $1.7 trillion at the pump, but the National Automobile Dealers Association (NADA) said last month that the new proposal could add as much as $5,000 to the sticker price of a new vehicle in 2025.

Source: The Detroit News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Big Brother
By Dorkyman on 2/14/2012 2:39:22 PM , Rating: 2
I just love Big Brother. He knows what's best for all of us, and watches over us. I don't need to worry about anything or make decisions on my own.

I'm so grateful that our country has made the transition from rugged individualism and freedom to one where all those very smart and superior people in Washington determine what's best for all of us. When I go to sleep I dream of Obama smiling at me. He's just so GOOD!

RE: Big Brother
By retrospooty on 2/14/2012 4:50:09 PM , Rating: 3
I agree with you on the big brother thing. The nanny state thing sucks, but it didnt start with Obama. This crap has been going on for decades.

RE: Big Brother
By Spuke on 2/15/2012 12:23:49 PM , Rating: 1
This crap has been going on for decades.
Fueled mostly by idiots like you! LOL!

RE: Big Brother
By superstition on 2/15/2012 5:20:18 PM , Rating: 2
Rugged individualism like the Trail of Tears?

The level of mythology in your post is a lot more than waist high.

People have been scamming each other from the beginning. We aren't bonobos. We're an inferior species, with a big flamboyant sex appendage sitting atop our shoulders that we think makes us special.

"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki