Apple Blitzkrieg Aims to Kill Android Ice Cream Sandwich
February 13, 2012 12:59 PM
comment(s) - last by
Apple claims Google's unified search, word suggestions, slide unlocking, and data tapping features are illegal
Apple, Inc. (
) may have fared pretty badly of late, in terms of its lawsuit performance, scoring nothing but Pyrrhic victories and outright rejections [
]. But the electronics maker is determined to kill its arch-nemesis Google Inc. (
). It has now filed a new major suit which looks to cripple Android Ice Cream Sandwich.
I. Apple Latest Attack Hits Ice Cream Sandwich
The core panzer in this patent blitzkrieg -- brought against Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (
), and by proxy Google, in
United States District Court for the Northern District of California
U.S. Patent No. 8,086,604
. Filed in 2011, and granted just after Christmas (Dec. 27), it describes a "universal interface for retrieval of information in a computer system." Apple is using the patent to attack the search features found within Android Ice Cream Sandwich
The suit specifically calls out Samsung's
Galaxy Nexus smartphone
, which was the first smartphone to carry the new version of Android.
A copy of the lawsuit can be found
II. The Return of the Touch Unlocking Patent
In the suit Apple also brings some familiar weapons to the table. The four-patent suit is rounded out by
U.S. Patent No. 8,046,721
, which describes a method of "unlocking a device by performing gestures on an unlock image";
U.S. Patent No. 5,946,647
, which covers turnings phone numbers/addresses in actionable hyperlinks; and
U.S. Patent No. 8,074,172
, which covers voice search word suggestions.
We've discussed at length how a wealth of prior art with regard to slide unlock existed (and was seemingly ignored by the
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office
). It may be that the USPTO intended to only grant the patent on a narrow scope, but if that was the case, it will be crucial that the federal court recognize that and avoid giving Apple credit for a technology it
clearly did not invent
The data tapping patent was file in 1996 and granted in 1999. It was not originally targeted at the mobile space. Here, Google may again be able to defend itself via prior art. Microsoft Corp.'s (
) Word 1997 used a similar method to recognize and generate hyperlinks, though it remains to be seen whether this would be similar enough to invalidate the patent.
Apple has already succeeded in banning some of HTC's handsets using its double-tapping patent. Now it looks to do the same to Samsung. [Image Source: Droid-Life]
Both slide-to-unlock and the data tapping are relatively crucial, as they're features users have come to expect from smartphones. Apple's hope is clearly to drive these features out of Android, and thus drive users to the iPhone, slowly bleeding the life from Android.
Recall, also, that HTC Corp. (
forced to gimp its Android smartphones
, removing data tapping after Apple won a preliminary injunction against it, on the basis of that feature.
The third patent -- word suggestion -- was filed in 2007. Again, this was a feature that appeared as early as 2006 in Ford Motor Comp.'s (
. That said, this patent is less crucial. While
the quality voice search app, Siri,
is a major selling point of the iPhone 4S, it's not as big a deal in Android Ice Cream Sandwich. Still, being forced to remove the voice search app would be another setback for Android.
Apple hopes to force Google to remove voice search from Android.
[Image Source: Gadget Pdamu]
III. What's Next
Apple has already brought a preliminary injunction against the Galaxy Nexus, looking to ban it from sale in the U.S. Apple's new case appears very aggressive, but it remains to be seen if Apple will be able to achieve its fantasy of a Google-free world in court, when it has thus far struggled to scrape together many wins.
Google has a powerful second line of defense, via Motorola. Motorola has won key decisions abroad [
], thus far and may succeed in banning the iPhone, iPad, and iCloud in some regions. If it can do that, it may force Apple into an uneasy armistice, out of self-preservation.
Apple v. Samsung [PDF]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: FILE ALL THE PATENTS
2/14/2012 10:27:03 AM
Companies (large or small) have no obligations whatsoever other than to, their customers, shareholders, and the laws in the countries in which they are operating. It's the "Justice" department failing here, not Apple. Apple may be the company most blatantly taking advantage of a ridiculous legal situation, but you can pretty easily argue that Apple is just doing the best they can with the tools available - nostalgia (or "obligation to their home markets" if you want to call it that) is not necessarily a good way to run a business. With luck, though, Apple's flagrant use/abuse of the patent system will lead to IP law reform. ...I do consider myself an optimist, though.
Problems like this are certainly not specific to one "side" or the other in US politics. IP owners have seemingly bought themselves a pretty wide support base, which is made easier by the fact that, up until recently, this was not an issue that polarized voters ("polarizing" issues tend to get picked up by one side and demonized by the other in a two party system). Hopefully, (again being optimistic) people will become more concerned about IP issues going forward, and this will become more difficult for the big IP owners.
I believe that restrictive IP law is the number one threat to personal freedom in the world, right now (especially the "developed" world).
"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken
German Appeals Court Approves Galaxy 10.1N, Tells Apple "Deal With It"
February 9, 2012, 6:01 PM
Dutch Court Slaps Apple With Another Loss in its Anti-Android Crusade
January 24, 2012, 7:46 AM
Quick Note: Motorola Secures Legal Victory Against Apple in Patent Suit
January 13, 2012, 8:02 PM
The Empire Strikes Back: Apple Scores U.S. Ban on HTC's Low End Phones
December 19, 2011, 11:21 PM
Nexus LTE, World's First Android ICS Phone Lands on Verizon Today
December 15, 2011, 11:41 AM
Skrillex Releases Free Album Inside App, But Crashes Torture Fans
March 13, 2014, 8:04 PM
Microsoft Waives Windows Phone OS Licensing Fees for Two Hardware Makers in India
March 13, 2014, 1:07 PM
Huawei Says Windows Phone is "Low Priority", Relegates It to Dual OS
March 13, 2014, 11:21 AM
$1,200 Nikon 1 V3 Mirrorless Camera Offers 120fps Slow Motion Capture
March 13, 2014, 9:04 AM
Surface 2 LTE Tipped for AT&T, Power Cover Available for Pre-order
March 12, 2014, 9:15 AM
HTC One Leaks: LED Smart Cover, Carrier Models, Google Play Ed.
March 11, 2014, 5:30 PM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Windows 8.1 Update 1 Leaked Early
March 7, 2014, 9:30 AM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
Staples Closing 225 Stores Across North America
March 7, 2014, 1:24 PM
Vine Users No Longer Allowed to Post Pornographic Videos
March 7, 2014, 1:47 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information