Print 30 comment(s) - last by SPOOFE.. on Feb 10 at 1:31 PM

Nikon D800  (Source:

Nikon D800  (Source:
The D800 will be released in March while the D800E will ship in April

After announcing the new D4 flagship D-SLR at the Consumer Electronics Show (CES) last month, Nikon is now announcing its second full frame D-SLR of the year: the D800 Digital SLR.

The new D800 doesn't quite match up to the high-end D4, but is instead the smaller and less expensive relative. However, it still packs a pretty mean catalogue of features and is meant for professional use. The D800, according to Nikon, is intended for shooting multimedia content, weddings and high fashion.

The D800 features a 36.3-megapixel FX-format CMOS sensor capturing 7360 x 4912 resolution, a 91,000-pixel RGB Matrix Metering System, full HD 1080p video, Nikon's latest EXPEED 3 image processing engine, Advanced Scene Recognition System, and a 51-point AF system for quality images. The D800 also offers minimal noise in many different lighting environments, with a native ISO range of 100-6400, expandable to 50 (Lo-1) -25,600 (Hi-2).

“Whatever the project, visionaries need a tool that is going to help them stay on-time and on-task,” said Bo Kajiwara, director of marketing, Nikon Inc. “The Nikon D800 re-imagines what is possible from this level of D-SLR, to address the needs of an emerging and ever changing market; this is the camera that is going to bridge the gap for the most demanding imaging professionals, and provide never before seen levels of SLR image and video quality. The D800 is the right tool for today’s creative image makers, affording photographers, filmmakers and videographers a versatile option for capturing the ultimate in still image quality or full HD content, with maximum control.”

The D800 will likely be a hit with video enthusiasts due to its manual exposure controls in video mode and 1080p recording at 30, 25 and 24 fps. Users can also send uncompressed video to a monitor through HDMI as the video is being captured.

New D800 buyers can expect a high-speed USB 3.0 connector, which is also compatible with USB 2.0 cables at slower transfer rates, and two card slots, where one is for CompactFlash cards and the other is for SDHC/SDXC cards.

The D800 is both smaller and cheaper than the D4, with a size of 5.7 inches wide, 4.8 inches tall and 3.2 inches deep (compared to the D4 with 6.3 inches wide, 6.2 inches tall and 3.6 inches deep) and a price of $2,999.95 (compared to the D4's $6,000 price tag).

In addition to the D800, Nikon will also release the D800E, which eliminates the D800's integrated low-pass filter. The price for the D800E is $3,299.95.

The D800 will be available in March while the D800E will be released in April. The D4 ships in February.

Source: Nikon

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: gap?
By Iaiken on 2/7/2012 12:18:14 PM , Rating: 3
this simple technology should have been built in

Eye-Fi cards are not compatible with CF-adapters. Period.

Further, Eye-Fi has over 200 patents on every conceivable implementation and refuses to license out the tech. The SD Association published a Wi-Fi standard based on their insider knowledge of Eye-Fi technology, but it is likely that any company implementing the standard would get sued to hell and back, so nobody has yet tried.

RE: gap?
By Nortel on 2/7/2012 1:53:25 PM , Rating: 2
Nikon WT-1, WT-3A, WT-4A wireless transmitters came onto the market well before Eye-Fi cards. Are you trying to say Nikon cannot implement its own technology in its products?

I looked it up and it looks like everyone is begging Eye-Fi to create a CF version or a SD -> CF adapter with a different controller but they refuse. You can use an adapter but they are not officially supported; you have reduced range and corruption is a possibility.

RE: gap?
By Iaiken on 2/7/2012 2:32:49 PM , Rating: 3
WT-1, WT-3A, WT-4A wireless transmitters

These are a really clumsy implementation in order to get around the eye-fi patents. While the Eye-Fi Pro serves as a wireless N hotspot that the other device pulls from, the WT-series serves as a G client and as such is fraught with problems and pitfalls.

1. The WT series is reliant on there being an accessible Wi-Fi network already in place for it to traverse to the other machine. In many location shoots, this will not be the case and you will have to set up your own.

2. Uses a push configuration without handshaking or validation before deleting the file. This can result in files being corrupted during sending or otherwise vanishing into thin air.

3. Destination machine must be set up correctly to recieve or else you will simply lose all your files to the above idiocy.

4. No geotagging.

5. Cannot transfer files in RAW format, they must be pushed in some other format.

6. Cannot transfer files to more than one device.

None of these are problems with the Eye-Fi. It can be set up in a push-pull configuration using a Zeroconf client on multiple devices and formats (RAW to laptop, jpg to tablet). You can administer it remotely the way you would a wireless router at home to lock down permissions. If it loses connection to the other devices, it will store up the backlog until it comes back in range. You can even interact with the device using only your web browser. Did I mention that it costs 10x less than the inferior Nikon solution.

I don't disagree that things like this should be a de facto standard feature in high priced cameras, but that can't happen until Eye-Fi starts licensing the tech. The company is privately owned and this puts it in a very strong position as it is safe from being taken over and can exploit it's monopolistic position. After it's partnership with SanDisk, Eye-fi is in a better position than ever before.

RE: gap?
By anactoraaron on 2/7/2012 2:33:42 PM , Rating: 2
Yes and all of the Nikon wireless transmitters have cost quite a bit. You can't compare a WT-4A $700+ to a ~$75 8GB eye-fi card with wireless n. Eye-Fi seized an opportunity to make a less expensive product.

But with UHS-1 SD cards at 45MB/sec (and I'm lovin my Sandisk Extreme's getting a constant 27MB/sec write) and UHS-2 spec at 312MB/sec will we even need CF soon? If there's a 'low end' UHS-2 100MB/sec 8GB/16GB SD card and the price is right will anyone still use CF?

"The whole principle [of censorship] is wrong. It's like demanding that grown men live on skim milk because the baby can't have steak." -- Robert Heinlein
Related Articles

Latest Headlines
Inspiron Laptops & 2-in-1 PCs
September 25, 2016, 9:00 AM
The Samsung Galaxy S7
September 14, 2016, 6:00 AM
Apple Watch 2 – Coming September 7th
September 3, 2016, 6:30 AM
Apple says “See you on the 7th.”
September 1, 2016, 6:30 AM

Most Popular ArticlesAre you ready for this ? HyperDrive Aircraft
September 24, 2016, 9:29 AM
Leaked – Samsung S8 is a Dream and a Dream 2
September 25, 2016, 8:00 AM
Yahoo Hacked - Change Your Passwords and Security Info ASAP!
September 23, 2016, 5:45 AM
A is for Apples
September 23, 2016, 5:32 AM
Walmart may get "Robot Shopping Carts?"
September 17, 2016, 6:01 AM

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki