Print 33 comment(s) - last by toyotabedzrock.. on Feb 1 at 5:22 PM

EU regulators grow tired of Samsung and Apple bickering in court

Europe has been a focal battleground in the international patent dispute between Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd. (KS:005930) and Apple, Inc. (AAPL).  Of late, justices in EU member states seem to be growing tired of the discourse and have been throwing the cases out of court.  Samsung has seen this happen several times [1][2][3] and Apple has also been on the receiving end [1][2][3].

Further evidence of European regulators' growing frustration came today when Samsung was slapped with a formal antitrust investigation.  The investigation follows an information-gathering phase, in which EU officials reached out to both Samsung and Apple.

An EU executive commented to Reuters, "The (European) Commission will investigate, in particular, whether in doing so (seeking injunctions on patent infringements in 2011) Samsung has failed to honor its irrevocable commitment given in 1998 to the European Telecommunications Standards."

Cartman probe
Samsung is getting probed. [Image Source: South Park Studios/Comedy Central]

The sticky mess Samsung finds itself in comes courtesy of the "fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory" (FRAND) rules, which the EU -- like the U.S. -- uses to govern patents on vital technology standards, such as 3G wireless communication technologies.    The FRAND rules mandate that the filer show willingness to license the patent.

The EU investigation will probe into whether Samsung broke the law by refusing to license these patents to Apple and suing it with them.  A key point of debate will perhaps be whether it is "fair" to deny a company that is trying to sue a firm out of business licensing.  Samsung may have a hard time making that case, given the offensive nature it took in the EU campaign, being the first to file in several regions.

The EU is fond of fines; it recently hit Microsoft Corp. (MSFT) and Intel Corp. (INTC) with fines of over a billion dollars [1][2].

Ballmer howling
Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer knows the pain of EU antitrust fines.
[Image Source: OReilly Media]

Apple may relish its rival's misfortune, but it has cause for concern as well.  The initial EU probe also targeted it.  Given Apple's serial filings in Europe, and overly broad claims ("Samsung says Galaxy Tab 10.1, we say any tablet device" -- Apple counsel) there may be cause for the EU to pursue a formal intellectual abuse investigation against Apple as well.

The EU tends to practice a stricter brand of antitrust law than the U.S.  However, the U.S. has increasingly followed in the EU's line, which may spell trouble for both Apple and Samsung.

Samsung's smartphone operating system partner Google Inc. (GOOG) was recently the subject of an EU antitrust probe.  Shortly thereafter U.S. regulators opened a similar probe into its dominant positions (although its U.S. Android position has weakened of late in the face of unexpectedly strong iPhone 4S sales).

Apple vs Samsung
Apple and Samsung have been warring for market dominance, both in stores and in court. [Image Source: PhoneBuff]

Like Google and Apple, Samsung and Apple enjoy an awkward relationship as business partners-turned-business rivals.  Samsung continues to manufacture chips that are used in Apple's smartphone, which is by far the best selling smartphone globally, in terms of single-model sales.

Samsung has targeted Apple with a taste of its own medicine of late -- airing commercials mocking Apple "fanboys" (extreme fans).  The two companies were in a dead heat in terms of smartphone sales in Q4 2012, with Samsung moving 36.5m units and Apple moving 37m.

Source: EU [press release]

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: long-term prognosis
By michael67 on 1/31/2012 2:48:15 PM , Rating: -1
Actually the original fine was 0.5B euro "only". 0_o

And before people are starting to say the EU are just money grabbing bastard's, that only doing to save there balance.
The EU year budget is about 150B euro, and these infractions spanned years of not following the law!

And actually a EU companies get often fined more then most US companies.

In Holland on April 18, 2007 the European commission fined Heineken for forming a cartel €219.3m / 17m citizens = €13 per citizen

The EU fined MS for a total of €1.7b / 0.5b citizens = €3.4 per citizen
And the initial fine was after some warnings that ware ignored, "only" €500m (is €1 per citizen) for not following the rules, but MS was thinking f**k you EU, we don't give a shit about your rules, we are a American company and don't give a shit about some perky local rules.

But the Commission upped the game and start fining MS €1.5m a day and still MS was not listening then they upped it to €3m, finally MS did what was ask of them by local law.

I am always amassed by some Americans complaining about the fining, and not one even bothered to even go to Wikipedia, and look up what really happened.

What would happen if i get in my Skyline drive to fast, get puled over and get a ticket, after i got the ticket, i trow it out of the window stick my middle finger up, and continue to keep on speeding, i ignore the next stop sign, maneuver pass a roadblock, and only stop after i am cornered and the only way out is over a spike strips.

That was basically what happened between MS and the Commission during the time the EU wanted MS to follow EU law.
Dont think that American companies are special that they don't have to follow local laws, because i am pretty sure that my company that's also have a US branch(*) follows local US law.


Just saying when in Rome, do do as the Romans do. (follow local law)

"If you look at the last five years, if you look at what major innovations have occurred in computing technology, every single one of them came from AMD. Not a single innovation came from Intel." -- AMD CEO Hector Ruiz in 2007

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki