backtop


Print 55 comment(s) - last by n00bxqb.. on Jan 31 at 3:45 AM


  (Source: Gigaom)
Computer maker says no to progress, drops another shovel of dirt on webOS's grave

In a further blow to those hoping for a webOS revival Jon Rubinstein, the iconic Palm CEO who supervised the creation of the webOS-powered Pre, has been released from his executive post at Hewlett-Packard Comp. (HPQ).  

I. A Failure of Vision

HP has been on a mess roller coaster ride over the last year shuffling CEOs and even contemplating spinning off the heart of its company -- the consumer PC business.  The change in leadership has also led HP to effectively abandon its hope of being a viable player in the mobile tablet/smart phone space.

The company blew $1.2B USD to acquire Palm Inc. in April 2010, in what seemed like a promising move for both companies at the time.  Palm still had a legion of firm supporters, and while it was no longer the iPhone competitor it was once was (and which Android became) it still had a shot.

That shot was killed by HP's floundering board and hapless new executive leadership.  The webOS product line was officially discontinued in Aug. 2011.  Meanwhile HP seemed to be combing through its ranks removing all the one-time supporters [1][2][3] of webOS.

Seppuku wide
"I didn't know there was such a thing as corporate suicide, but now we know that there is.  It's just astonishing." -- Ex-HP Board Chairman Tom Perkins on the company's struggles
[Image Source: Euro-Synergies]

After HP became the second major company in two years to fire Léo Apotheker from its CEO spot for poor performace, new CEO Meg Whitman reported shopped around webOS to prospective buyers.  But her asking price of $1.2B USD -- what HP had paid for it before it desecrated the remains of Palm -- was reportedly considered laughable by serious buyer prospects like Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (KS:005930).

Unsurprisingly no buyer was found.

II. Jon Rubinstein Departs to More Fertile Shores

Today HP has open sourced webOS, essentially giving away for free the product that months before it had hope to get a billion dollars for.

HP was quiet about the departure of Mr. Rubinstein.  They would only say, when reached for comment by The Verge, "Jon has fulfilled his commitment and we wish him well."

Jon Rubinstein
Jon Rubinstein, father of the iPod and Palm Pre [Image Source: CellPassion]

Ultimately this is likely a smart career move for Mr. Rubinstein, who originally gained fame as the creator of the iPod at Apple, Inc. (AAPL).  Mr. Rubinstein has put out solid products at companies who have ambition, companies who have the willingness to take risks in the mobile space -- attributes that are sorely lacking at HP.

Sadly for webOS fans, this is one more sign that the beloved platform is taking its final ride into the glow of the twilight.  As HP reassigns the remainder of the webOS skeleton crew who weren't laid off yet, Mr. Rubinstein's departure serves as perhaps the final reminder that once there was a company named Palm, a company with two decades of bold mobile vision, a company whose final spark of life was extinguished by HP.

(AllThingsDigitals reports that Mr. Rubinstein has been absent from the office for months, in silent protest of Mr. Apotheker's decision to kill webOS, and that HP only now got around to clarifying his status.)

Sources: The Verge, AllThingsD



Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: sigh...
By zlandar on 1/27/2012 4:40:34 PM , Rating: 2
Actually it's Comcast residential service lol.

It peaks at 20MB and varies from 15-20MB testing through speakeasy. The 5MB up is pretty constant.


RE: sigh...
By JasonMick (blog) on 1/27/2012 4:48:07 PM , Rating: 2
quote:
It peaks at 20MB and varies from 15-20MB testing through speakeasy. The 5MB up is pretty constant.
They probably have a rival firm in your region, and are hence forced to perform...

There's long been no cable internet competitors in my region.

A couple of the local cities had municipal Wi-Fi and they were enjoying like 20-30 Mbps, but in the rest of the area we got like half that at best.

I tend to tether or use Wi-Fi connections, as I dropped Comcast's junk service pretty quickly.

Uverse just rolled into town, though, and they're starting to crank up some faster offerings, so I'm thinking of switching to them.

But yea, maybe Comcast in some regions chooses to be kind, but in my regional experience they'll give you the junkiest service they can get away with when there's no competition...


RE: sigh...
By retrospooty on 1/27/2012 5:03:34 PM , Rating: 2
If you are lucky enough to live where they have Cox cable, you can really soar... I have the 27mbps down - 6mbps up plan for $45. You can get the 55mbps down plan for $95. Way overkill, but Cox is really good. Always up, and never an issue.

http://ww2.cox.com/residential/arizona/internet/ul...


RE: sigh...
By Spuke on 1/27/2012 5:38:52 PM , Rating: 2
Cox has always been the shizzle.


RE: sigh...
By retrospooty on 1/27/2012 7:26:12 PM , Rating: 2
Yup, unlike Qwest, Comcast, and many others, you almost never hear a complaint about Cox. I have none. It works, its fast, and they never mess with you or do anything that pisses people off.


RE: sigh...
By Obujuwami on 1/27/2012 5:04:11 PM , Rating: 2
be careful with uverse, I was asking questions like "will I have fiber come directly into my house?" and the sales guys said yes. Instead they wanted to pull it from the 30+ year old 2-wire phone line. I told them to go stick it but in honesty, would it be so bad for them to offer FIOS like service? It would be getting ourselves ahead of the rest of the world and I know FIOS or its competitors are expanding along the east coast and Washington State (maybe even Portland area now).

Verizon has it right by pulling fiber to the house!


RE: sigh...
By Solandri on 1/28/2012 12:49:44 PM , Rating: 2
For very short runs, the old 2-wire Cat 3 phone lines can hit over 200 Mbps with current technology. I've heard 500 Mbps is in development. If the provider does it right, there's nothing wrong with doing the street-to-house hookup over copper. At least not until we start getting Internet speeds measured in Gbps.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_high_speed_digit...
VDSL2 is commonly used to network hotels and apartment buildings.

The problem with running fiber to the house is that it puts the transition from fiber back to copper (your network/phone/TV cables) inside your house. That box sits in your home (mine is in the garage) and requires a battery backup in case of power failure. And after the 1 year warranty, it's your responsibility to maintain and replace the battery (lead-acid batteries used as battery backups typically only last 2-3 years). If the box should stop working, I suspect I'd have to pay for it too.

If the fiber ends at the street and hooks up to your home via copper, that box sits underneath the street. It's then serviced by the ISP's battery backup or backup power lines. Maintaining and replacing the batteries and the unit is their responsibility and their cost. Maybe in the future we'll have cable-modems which plug directly into the fiber. But because FIOS carries Internet, TV, and phone service, you still need a box sitting in your garage to convert the fiber back to copper. As long as any one of those still relies on copper wires, you will need the box.


RE: sigh...
By icrf on 1/27/2012 10:26:39 PM , Rating: 2
I'm in Chattanooga with symmetric 30 Mbps municipal fiber. Comcast in the area has 25 down / 5? up, which I didn't have any complaints about when I had it. I've had DNS problems with both the fiber provider (EPB) and Comcast, but point to Google's DNS servers solves that quite well.

I also have a firesale TouchPad and the OS has a lot of good features, it just isn't polished or tuned. Everyone isn't ga-ga over what it is, but rather what it could have been if the investment were made. Faulting a double tap feature or loading speed in the browser doesn't take into account the OS itself and the whole card multitasking system, which was its real big feature. Android 4.0 is attempting something similar, but I don't think it's quite there.

While I don't hate WebOS, I don't love it, either. Once there's a nice, stable CM9 port available, I'm likely to jump ship. I'll probably end up putting CM9 on my HTC Thunderbolt, too.


RE: sigh...
By JediJeb on 1/27/2012 6:01:17 PM , Rating: 2
I wish I could get something like that. Where I live, 5 miles from a town of 20k people, the best offered is 1.5M down DSL from AT&T. My parents live out in the middle of nowhere 20 miles from the nearest town of 1500 people and the local independent phone service there is offering them 2M down DSL service for less than what I am paying. That little telco has been around for decades and has always offered service to 4 counties for less than half of what AT&T did and were the first to even put up cell towers for their independent cellphone service well before Cingular or anyone else provided service in that area. It just goes to show that AT&T is just too cheap to invest in good service to any area that isn't a metropolis.


"So if you want to save the planet, feel free to drive your Hummer. Just avoid the drive thru line at McDonalds." -- Michael Asher














botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki