Print 68 comment(s) - last by toyotabedzrock.. on Feb 3 at 11:10 AM

Ener1's EnerDel subsidiary, which is wholly owned, won an $118.5 million grant in August 2009 from the U.S. Department of Energy to develop electric batteries

The Obama administration has had some horrible luck when it comes to dealing out energy loans. In 2011 alone, two energy companies filed for bankruptcy after receiving hefty sums from the government. Now, the administration can add a third strike to its list of bad deals.

Ener1 Inc., a company that provides efficient technology for the auto industry, filed for bankruptcy protection yesterday. The company's EnerDel subsidiary, which is wholly owned, won an $118.5 million grant in August 2009 from the U.S. Department of Energy to develop electric batteries for a Volvo electric vehicle and Think models. So far, EnerDel has spent $55 million of the $118.5 million.

"This was a difficult, but necessary, decision for our company," said Alex Sorokin, Ener1 CEO. "We are extremely pleased to have the strong support of our primary investors and lenders to substantially reduce the company's debt. Their support demonstrates that our business partners have an appreciation for our future business opportunities in proving energy storage solutions for electric grid, transportation and industrial applications. We expect the new funding to provide ample liquidity for our subsidiaries to meet their ongoing obligations to employees, customers and suppliers."

Ener1 is looking to jump on a restructuring plan that will provide $81 million to recapitalize the company and reduce its debt. Also, the company's existing common stock will be canceled, long-term debt holders will receive a new term loan, cash and new common stock in exchange for claims, new preferred stock will be given to the provider of the post-petition and exit funding, and Ener1's general creditors will be paid under the restructuring plan.

Vice President Joe Biden toured Ener1, located in Greenfield, Indiana, in January 2011. Biden believed the loan still seemed like a good move at the time, since Obama was pushing to put 1 million electric vehicles on the road by 2015 and needed electric batteries to do so. But in June 2011, its largest customer, Think Global, which filed for bankruptcy, affected Ener1. It has since been a downhill battle for Ener1, which was delisted from NASDAQ in December 2011.

"The Department of Energy's grant to EnerDel is supporting a cutting edge battery manufacturing plant that is producing batteries in America that are being sold across the country and around the world," said Jen Stutsman, spokesperson for the Energy Department. "This grant is part of the department's efforts to commercialize promising vehicle technologies that will help America to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and ensure U.S. companies can compete in the global auto industry. While it's unfortunate that Ener1, the parent company, has entered a restructuring process, the new infusion of $80 million in private capital demonstrates that the technology has merit. As the company has said, the restructuring is not expected to impact EnerDel's operations and they do not expect to reduce employment at the site."

Despite the bankruptcy filing, the Department of Energy said the program is still moving forward and Ener1 will continue to operate normally. Employees are also expected to keep their jobs.

In addition to the $118.5 million grant from government, EnerDel also received $10 million in grants from the Bush administration and another $7.1 million in tax credits from Gov. Mitch Daniels (R-IN) to create the electric batteries.

Electric batteries for EVs have recently fallen under the spotlight due to General Motors' Chevrolet Volt, which had battery fire issues throughout 2011. Four different Volts participated in side-impact crash tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), and three of them sparked or caught fire. This led to an investigation, which resulted in GM CEO Dan Akerson being called to testify in front of Congress this week. Thousands of Volts were also recalled to receive a steel piece that would better protect the lithium batteries.

Ener1's failure marks the third bad energy loan dealt by the Department of Energy. In September 2011, Silicon Valley-based solar panel company Solyndra filed for bankruptcy after receiving a $535 million loan from the DOE in 2009. Government officials reportedly warned the administration of the viability of Solyndra, saying the company would go bankrupt in a matter of two years. The warnings were put aside in order to meet political deadlines.

Later in November 2011, Beacon Power, a company that creates flywheels to store power and increase grid efficiency by preventing blackouts, filed for bankruptcy after receiving a $43 million loan guarantee from the Department of Energy in August 2010.

Sources: Businessweek, The Detroit News

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

Hopes and Dreams
By FITCamaro on 1/27/2012 10:12:55 AM , Rating: 4
Don't make good business plans. Too bad the government considers them valid ones. But when you have a president creating policy with nothing but hopes and dreams as a basis, it's not surprising.

RE: Hopes and Dreams
By Shig on 1/27/2012 1:07:09 PM , Rating: 2
It'd be nice for a change for you to cite some precedent for your rhetoric, but you never do :(

I respect your opinion, but c'mon man, cite something once in a while, provide these DT readers with SOMETHING other than your politicized viewpoint.

It must clearly be hopes and dreams powering my laptop while I write this, it's clearly not a battery.

RE: Hopes and Dreams
By FITCamaro on 1/27/2012 2:04:16 PM , Rating: 2
The article is my citation. As it points out, in less than 6 months there have been three bankruptcies of companies the DOE has lended very large sums of taxpayer money. All because they want to push "green" energy. It doesn't seem to matter either if the companies have a failing business plan/model. In the case of Solyndra, it was known that the company had a high probability of failure. Yet they were not only given half a billion dollars, when their failure was even more imminent, the terms were rewritten so that the investors got their money before the taxpayers.

RE: Hopes and Dreams
By Shig on 1/27/2012 4:05:43 PM , Rating: 2
You constantly cite "green" energy as being evil.

Can you please cite the failed fossil fuel based companies over the past 120 years that have failed and have used tax payer money?

In a fair debate you must present these facts when you mention Solyndra so many times.

RE: Hopes and Dreams
By Masospaghetti on 1/28/2012 9:34:59 AM , Rating: 1
As it points out, in less than 6 months there have been three bankruptcies of companies the DOE has lended very large sums of taxpayer money.

What is important here is not the actual number of failures, but the % of failures. 3 out of 50,000 would be pretty damn good. 3 out of get the idea.

How many energy start-ups were invested in?

"This is about the Internet.  Everything on the Internet is encrypted. This is not a BlackBerry-only issue. If they can't deal with the Internet, they should shut it off." -- RIM co-CEO Michael Lazaridis

Copyright 2016 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki