Print 65 comment(s) - last by Bobby2000.. on Feb 1 at 12:30 PM

Foxconn factory in China  (Source:
According to Apple executives and Foxconn management, safety is the last thing on Apple's mind

For hardcore Apple fans, rushing out to buy the next iPhone or iPad is a top priority -- even if it means standing in line for hours. But in the words of an anonymous former Apple executive, most people would be disturbed if they knew where their iPhone came from.

Apple's history with suppliers that are abusive to their employees is no secret. Foxconn and Wintek are among Apple's electronics suppliers that have factories in China with horrible working conditions, but no matter how many times violations of Apple's supplier code of conduct are brought to light, the situation remains the same. Now, The New York Times has taken a closer look at the bleak environment that the employees of Apple's Asian suppliers are forced to deal with in its second installment of its iEconomy series.

Apple's supplier code of conduct, which was developed in 2005, states "that working conditions in Apple's supply chain are safe, that workers are treated with respect and dignity, and that manufacturing processes are environmentally responsible." While this code was made with good intentions, it is not being upheld entirely by Apple or some of Apple's suppliers. Employees have complained of working long hours, unsafe working conditions and little pay -- all in the name of assembling iPhones, iPads and iPods at a rapid pace.

"You can either manufacture in comfortable, worker-friendly factories, or you can reinvent the product every year, and make it better and faster and cheaper, which requires factories that seem harsh by American standards," said a current Apple executive, who requested anonymity due to the sensitive topic. "And right now, customers care more about a new iPhone than working conditions in China."

Foxconn, which is Apple's electronics supplier in Chengdu, China, is one of the worst offenders of Apple's supplier code of conduct. Employees and worker advocates have both described the horrible conditions that workers must endure. Many work over 60 hours per week, putting in an obscene amount of overtime. Some work 12 hours per day, six days or more per week. Signs on the walls of Foxconn offer reminders such as, "Work hard on the job today or work hard to find a job tomorrow." There are 24-hour shifts, and 70,000 of the employees are crammed into tiny dorms when they have some time off. At times, about 20 workers would be stuffed into a three-bedroom apartment. There were also issues with the employment of under-age workers.

As if exhaustion and crowded living spaces weren't enough, the conditions within the actual factory were well below satisfactory. Aluminum dust clouded the Foxconn factories due to machines that polished iPad cases, and the factories had poor ventilation systems. A Hong Kong advocacy group called Students and Scholars Against Corporate Misbehavior published a warning, which was sent to Apple, to let the company know about the potential dangers of aluminum dust buildup.

The warning clearly went unnoticed, since two Foxconn factories exploded as a result of the aluminum dust. The first occurred in May 2011 in Foxconn's Chengdu factory, which killed four people and injured another 77. The second occurred in Shanghai and ended up injuring 59 workers while hospitalizing another 23.

The explosions weren't Foxconn's only high-profile issues over the last few years. In 2010, Foxconn's Shenzhen factory, which is responsible for Apple's iPods, iPhones and iPads, experienced a series of employee suicides due to the stressful and exhausting working conditions. There were at least 12 suicides during this time period as well as a riot. To address the issue, Foxconn made employees promise not to kill themselves and installed anti-suicide nets at its facilities.

"Conditions at Foxconn are anything but harsh," wrote Foxconn in a statement after the riot. "All assembly line employees are given regular breaks, including one-hour lunch breaks. Foxconn has a very good safety record. Foxconn has come a long way in our efforts to lead our industry in China in areas such as workplace conditions and the care and treatment of our employees."

Even Apple seemed to defend its supplier's factories overseas. Steve Jobs, former Apple CEO, made the factories sound like theme parks.

"I actually think Apple does one of the best jobs of any companies in our industry, and maybe in any industry, of understanding the working conditions in our supply chain," said Jobs. "I mean, you go to this place, and, it's a factory, but, my gosh, I mean, they've got restaurants and movie theaters and hospitals and swimming pools, and I mean, for a factory, it's a pretty nice factory."

Jobs' statement seems to contradict the company's own audits, though. Apple has been publishing audits of its supplier's factories since 2007, and completed 396 walkthroughs by last year. Each year, there have been several and consistent violations to Apple's supplier code of conduct. For instance, in 2007, Apple completed three dozen audits where two-thirds demonstrated employees working over the 60 hour limit. There were also cases of underage workers, falsified records, improper disposal of hazardous waste and cases where workers were paid below minimum wage (or even nothing at all) as punishment.

"Apple never cared about anything other than increasing product quality and decreasing production cost," said Li Mingqi, a former Foxconn Technology manager at the Chengdu factory. "Workers' welfare has nothing to do with their interests."

Source: The New York Times

Comments     Threshold

This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

RE: Waiting for the ironic comment
By AnnihilatorX on 1/27/2012 9:57:01 AM , Rating: 5
That's being ignorant, of course Apple can do something, but Apple probably won't.

Apple is awash with money, Wall street is talking about how Apple should spend its vast cash reserve in paying stake holders.

Why not sign an agreement with Foxconn to give people a payrise on Apple's expense? No they won't do that, that's too generous. There is no problem in investing extra factories in China to cope with demand and in doing so lower the load of current factories, cutting working hour by an hour for example will do a lot of good. No they won't do that, it's too moral.

RE: Waiting for the ironic comment
By Reclaimer77 on 1/27/12, Rating: 0
By TroubledMacUser on 1/27/2012 10:11:19 PM , Rating: 5
This "there's nothing Apple can do about it" comment is patently and thoroughly false, and the best example disproving it is how much of a difference Nike made in improving third world factory conditions when it was pilloried for similar worker abuse.

Nike realized, after a period of making this same sort of "its globalization, there's little we can do" BS, that they were in danger of losing a priceless lifestyle brand that celebrated health and freedom, but that hardly gibed with brutal, unsafe and anti-labor conditions in harsh and poorly ventilated factories around Southeast Asia. Nike got in gear, read the riot act to their suppliers, brought in inspectors and worked closely with their suppliers to transform conditions around Asia. It was very influential and helped spur changes in the entire sector, as well as empowering workers to speak up and be able to organize. Nike largely got it done.

Apple has ten times the pull of Nike. If Apple threatened to pull their work out of Foxconn and its suppliers if this stuff continues to go on, things would change overnight, believe me. Apple should already start diversifying their manufacturing so no one supplier has them at any disadvantage. I'd like to see a lot more jobs in the US as well.

The consumers have the power to force Apple to act, and Apple can revolutionize working conditions to the benefit of everyone. Toxic materials in China are already blowing into Seattle and the West Coast. The whole thing needs to be done as a high tech, clean venture, not recreate the bad old days.

The idea we or Apple can't fix it is beyond preposterous, its patently false. People are smart, they can make factories safe, give workers good conditions and a voice. Nike did it.

By dark matter on 1/31/2012 2:36:31 AM , Rating: 3
Obviously you have no idea about economics, blatantly. Do you even understand anything about brand perception, and the effect it can have on your bottom line. Obviously not.

"Vista runs on Atom ... It's just no one uses it". -- Intel CEO Paul Otellini

Copyright 2015 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki