Dutch Court Slaps Apple With Another Loss in its Anti-Android Crusade
January 24, 2012 7:46 AM
comment(s) - last by
EU court concludes that thorough review of prior art narrows Apple's design rights, vindicates Samsung
Apple, Inc. (
) has lost its latest round in its legal war against Android, as signs of a stalemate with Android continue to grow.
I. Android and Apple Reaching a Stalemate
All things considered, Apple should be pretty pleased at its recent results. It's managed to charge back to a
near tie in the U.S. market
, driven by pent up demand for a new iPhone, which was finally
fulfilled by the iPhone 4S
. Meanwhile Apple has successfully defended itself against arch-rival Samsung Electronics Comp., Ltd.'s (
in the Netherlands
, among other regions.
But that success has been soured by Apple's failure to win the legal fight it started.
On Tuesday, a Dutch court rejected Apple's appeal of a relatively pro-Samsung lower court ruling. The lower court ruled that the
numerous visual differences
between the iPad and Samsung's Galaxy Tab tablet line were compelling enough to rule out design infringement -- a key point Apple was trying to prove.
win on a single point
in the lower court case --
European Patent 2,059,868
-- a patent which covers features within a photo gallery app, features that the court found were too similar in Samsung's Android Gallery (pictures) app. This similarity was removed via a simple software update that overhauled the Gallery app, allowing Samsung to resume sales of its smartphones and tablets.
Lawyers for Apple filed an appeal, hoping a higher court might change their mind
about the design difference. But Apple had no such luck.
II. Dutch Court Complains Germans Didn't Consider Enough Prior Art
The Dutch court found Apple's design patent to be perfectly valid, but ruled that given the existence of at least two similar devices at the time of its launch (prior art), its design scope was narrow, and hence was not eligible for a blanket patent on all rectangular slab tablets.
The Dutch court considered the following examples of prior art in reaching this decision, as noted in the
U.S. Patent Application No. 2004/0041504 A1
the Knight Ridder tablet
the HP Compaq TC1000
Canadian Design Patent 89,155
Japanese design no. 887388
Japanese design no. 1142127
By contrast, the Düsseldorf Regional Court -- who will rule next week on whether to grant Apple a new preliminary injunction against Samsung's new German-specific Galaxy Tab 10,
complete with reworked case design
-- only considered the Knight Ridder tablet at the TC1000 in its determination that Apple should be granted a broader injunction over all "minimalist" rectangular tablets. In other words, the Dutch court says its German justice peers -- and perhaps Samsung's German lawyers --didn't do their homework very well.
But signs that the German court may be ready to change its mind as the preliminary ruling found that
Samsung's redesign was sufficient to escape infringement claims
III. Quick Peek: Do You Think These Products are the Same?
In the past we've highlighted the differences in design between the iPad, and the Galaxy Tab 10. This seems an appropriate time for a refresher. The difference include:
Only Galaxy Tab 10.1 has a camera (compared to the original iPad).
The thickness in the design patent doesn't match the thickness of the iPad or Galaxy Tab (please measure this in an imaging software, in pixels, if you don't believe us).
Bezel sizes don't match between any of the three designs.
Connectors and buttons on the side are different.
Screen sizes and aspect ratios are different.
Only the iPad has a home button.
All tablets are clearly and unambiguously branded.
The back color doesn't match.
IV. The Impact of the Prolonged Court Battle
The Dutch court has now rejected both Apple and Samsung's initial claims. Apple
continues to file new claims
, but one has to wonder how long it will continue before it tires of wasting energy and effort in what is increasingly a losing battle. The same goes for Samsung. Expect the German ruling to be pivotal in the future of this legal war. A win could embolden Apple, but a loss would make the lawsuit crusade look increasingly self-destructive for the American electronics firm.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab 10.1 (original design) [Images Source: 9to5Google]
In many ways the lawsuit crusade is part of late Apple CEO and co-founder Steven P. Jobs'
. But one has to wonder as these suits drag on, whether customers will slowly grow aware of these actions and tire of Apple's litigious ways.
Apple's desire to try to circumvent competition via the courts is puzzling, given that it seems to be doing alright already in terms of recent sales versus Android. While its suits have helped to
stifle the proliferation of Android tablets
slightly, they have mostly just left the Cupertino, Calif. company with
legal bills and negative publicity
. This stands in sharp contrast to Microsoft Corp.'s (
friendlier pro-licensing approach
, which has earned fat payouts on the wave of Android phonemakers' --
-- sales successes.
de Rechtspraak (Dutch Appeals Court)
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: HP should be suing Apple.
1/24/2012 9:19:02 PM
They basically invented the mass production automobile in the model t. That pretty much puts them as the industry founders but no they didn't invent first auto. Unlike apple who invented touchscreens the computer any product with the color black or white and the sky itself by the time its lawyers are done.
"I mean, if you wanna break down someone's door, why don't you start with AT&T, for God sakes? They make your amazing phone unusable as a phone!" -- Jon Stewart on Apple and the iPhone
Samsung Loses 3G Patent Case Against Apple in Germany
January 20, 2012, 8:42 AM
A Cupertino Comeback: Apple and Android are Almost Tied in U.S. Sales
January 18, 2012, 1:07 PM
Apple Dusts Itself Off and Tries Again, Targets 10 Samsung Smartphones in Germany
January 17, 2012, 9:01 AM
Advisors: Apple Should Drop Patent War, Seek Alliances with Android-Based Phone Makers
December 29, 2011, 10:26 AM
Germany Becomes Latest Court to Reject Apple's Android Assault
December 22, 2011, 3:17 PM
Man Who Shot Father for Texting During Movie Previews Was Also Texting
March 14, 2014, 2:25 PM
Sony's PS4 Outsells Microsoft's Xbox One for February
March 14, 2014, 12:36 PM
Skrillex Releases Free Album Inside App, But Crashes Torture Fans
March 13, 2014, 8:04 PM
Microsoft Waives Windows Phone OS Licensing Fees for Two Hardware Makers in India
March 13, 2014, 1:07 PM
Huawei Says Windows Phone is "Low Priority", Relegates It to Dual OS
March 13, 2014, 11:21 AM
$1,200 Nikon 1 V3 Mirrorless Camera Offers 120fps Slow Motion Capture
March 13, 2014, 9:04 AM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Hack Reveals Fallen Bitcoin CEO's Posh Tokyo Penthouse
March 10, 2014, 4:28 PM
Tesla Motors Calls New Jersey Out on New Rule Against Its Direct Sales Model
March 11, 2014, 12:01 PM
NASA Considering SpaceX "Red Dragon" for Returning Mars Samples to Earth
March 10, 2014, 2:43 PM
India Could Rock Google With Its Biggest Antitrust Fine Yet -- $5B USD
March 10, 2014, 8:12 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information