Samsung Loses 3G Patent Case Against Apple in Germany
January 20, 2012 8:42 AM
comment(s) - last by
The ruling comes only days after Apple filed another lawsuit to ban the Galaxy S II smartphone in Germany
A judge from the Mannheim Regional Court in Germany ruled that Samsung's claim regarding Apple's 3G/UMTS wireless communication patent violation is not valid.
Apple and Samsung's patent war began back in April 2011 when Apple claimed Samsung was an
"iPhone, iPad copycat."
More specifically, Apple said the Galaxy S 4G, Epic 4G and Nexus smartphones infringed on Apple patents.
Apple worked its fingers to the bone to ban Samsung's smartphones and tablets around the world, and successfully did so in countries like Australia and Germany. However, Samsung began launching a few patent suits of its own to retaliate and keep its property safe from Apple's harm. Samsung was able to
lift the ban on its popular Galaxy Tab 10.1 in Australia
in December 2011.
The two tech giants flung lawsuits back and forth through much of 2011, and it doesn't look like 2012 will be much different. Today, Judge Andreas Voss of the Mannheim Regional Court ruled that Samsung's claim against Apple, which is one of three pertaining to the 3G/UMTS wireless communication patent violation complaints in Germany, is invalid. Judge Voss did not mention why the claim was void. According to Florian Mueller, independent patent expert, two possible reasons could be that Apple's products didn't infringe on the patent in a technical sense or that the court believes Samsung's rights are "exhausted," while Apple has a technical license by extension.
"We are disappointed that the court did not share our views regarding the infringement by Apple of this specific patent in Germany," said Samsung.
The other two patent infringement claims against Apple regarding 3G/UMTS wireless communication will be determined on January 27 and March 2.
"This ruling related to only one of 13 patents that are currently in suit
between those parties
in Germany, and dozens of patents on a worldwide basis," said Mueller. "It's not the first rejection of a complaint involving these two players, and barring a major surprise, it won't be the last."
However, Samsung's technology isn't the only one at stake with these Apple-related patent wars. Android, which is Google's mobile operating system that runs on Samsung's mobile hardware, could stand to lose too. Just last month, the United States International Trade Commission ruled that some smartphone features are protected by Apple, such as the ability to tap a phone number within a text or email and call that person directly, and the ability to schedule a calendar appointment with the tap of a finger on a date in an email. These features, which are common throughout most smartphones now, could really hurt Android if Apple succeeds. However, most of these features require trivial changes that can work around Apple's constant griping.
The latest patent ruling comes only days after Apple filed its most recent lawsuit against Samsung in Germany, asking that the court ban Samsung's Galaxy S ll smartphone as well as nine other smartphones and five tablets.
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: Here we go again..
1/21/2012 12:01:34 AM
You completely missed the point while saying that you agree with the comment on iBooks right at the beginning of your disagreement.
The iBooks authoring system is proprietary. Any work created using the iBooks authoring system cannot be sold without permission from Apple. Also iBooks authoring system uses a proprietary ebook standard that is supported only by the iBook reader. So you also need permission from Apple to read the books created. If a reader cannot obtain an iBook app they cannot use iBook content.
Yes, you can create an equivalent work, using industry standard tools, that can be used with industry standard readers, but then they wouldn't be iBook.
RE: Here we go again..
1/21/2012 6:34:11 AM
The fact of the matter is the ibook authoring system is a revolutionary idea, but honestly trying to cut out the publishers and the other vendors will kill apple in the long run.
I honestly think an open format for this should be done for textbooks and other books making it easier for authors to publish their work and keep more of the profits
It will never work for something as broad as books if you cut out the ability to publish it anywhere else it just would never be cost effective for an author.
Apple shouldn't be stupid enough to challenge amazon and the big publishers on this they might be able to team up with amazon and b/n and cut out the publishers but trying to fight the other book retailers and the publishers is just suicide.
Honestly though I do love the idea but they really do need to realize that such an isolated system does not work all the time if you want to get above the 5-10% marketshare.
RE: Here we go again..
1/21/2012 11:09:38 AM
Ok, what revenue stream is Apple going to achieve under your scenario? They give the tool away for free, allowing the product to be published in other venues means they do not get paid.
"What would I do? I'd shut it down and give the money back to the shareholders." -- Michael Dell, after being asked what to do with Apple Computer in 1997
Samsung Now Making Apple's Smartphone/Tablet Chips in Texas
December 16, 2011, 1:01 PM
Australian Court Silences Apple's Cries, Allows Samsung Tablet to Launch
December 9, 2011, 1:18 PM
Apple Labels Samsung an iPhone, iPad Copycat in New Lawsuit
April 18, 2011, 4:56 PM
Apple Releases iOS 7.1, The First Major Update to Its "Rethought" Mobile OS
March 10, 2014, 1:52 PM
BlackBerry CEO Jokes that iPhone Users are "Wall Huggers"
March 10, 2014, 12:20 PM
Average Mobile Phone Bill in U.S. is Growing Despite Competition
March 10, 2014, 10:25 AM
Aussie Tried to Drop Drugs into a Prison Using an Aerial Drone
March 10, 2014, 9:32 AM
Quick Note: New Generation HTC One (M8) Photos Turn Up on Weibo
March 10, 2014, 9:04 AM
Sony, Panasonic Announce Archival Disc Standard Coming in 2015
March 10, 2014, 8:50 AM
Most Popular Articles
Bitcoin King Pt. II: Mt. Gox's Dictator Karpelès Proves Tragically Flawed
March 7, 2014, 1:12 PM
Bitcoin King: Mt. Gox CEO Mark Karpelès' History of Arrests, Firings
March 5, 2014, 9:05 AM
USAF Moves Forward With Long Range Bomber Program Despite Budget Crunch
March 4, 2014, 9:44 AM
Windows 8.1 Update 1 Leaked Early
March 7, 2014, 9:30 AM
Apple Won't Let UK Sons Unlock Their Deceased Mother's iPad
March 6, 2014, 12:44 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Tesla vs. BMW: Who Has the Safer EV?
Feb 1, 2014, 2:56 PM
Justice Leaks Details of Next HTC One Two Flagship Phone
Dec 5, 2013, 4:04 PM
Global Cyber Espionage Concerns Reveal Growing Cyber Armies
Nov 29, 2013, 11:04 AM
Is The Period Becoming an Expression of Anger?
Nov 26, 2013, 2:02 PM
NSA and Congress -- You Will Never Kill the Constitution, It's an Idea
Nov 10, 2013, 2:00 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information