backtop


Print 43 comment(s) - last by vanka.. on May 19 at 6:20 PM

RIAA wants $150,000 from XM for every song that XM listeners download

The Recording Industry Association of America has now taken one of its biggest targets to court, and it's not a leader of a big underground MP3 release group. It's XM Satellite Radio. The company, which released its Inno XM2go portable XM player. The issue with the new player from XM is that it allows the user to save tunes that the service broadcasts onto the player. The RIAA says that the player infringes on copyright laws.

The RIAA is looking to charge XM $150,000 for every song that a user downloads into the player. The ironic thing is that there are systems and players out there that have been out there for decades that allow customers to copy songs that are played over traditional radio, but not truely digital to digital as with XM.  The law has allowed for such "analog loopholes" since the inventions of such devices.

For XM, the company says that while users are able to download the tunes they listen to, the songs are then stored on the portable player and users are not able to transfer the songs over as files. XM says that its download feature is not an on-demand service like Apple's iTunes, in that users can pick the songs they want when they want it. XM says that the RIAA's actions are stiffling innovation and that it will fight the lawsuit on behalf of consumers.


Comments     Threshold


This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled

By Scrogneugneu on 5/18/2006 12:40:43 AM , Rating: 2
Are they kind of trying to create a new iTunes, but with a 150 000 times higher price? And on top of that, the user doesn't pay, it's the provider that pays?


I wonder if we could do something against them. Other than boycott, as they use that as numbers for money lost due to piracy. Some weird law has to exists. How is it called, psychological harassment? What if 2 million people were intending a lawsuit against them for that?

I mean, even if we lose, it would still be funny, and would stay forever in history... as well as costing very little to everyone (1$ per person = 2 millions to pay lawyers).




"Game reviewers fought each other to write the most glowing coverage possible for the powerhouse Sony, MS systems. Reviewers flipped coins to see who would review the Nintendo Wii. The losers got stuck with the job." -- Andy Marken











botimage
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. - RSS Feed | Advertise | About Us | Ethics | FAQ | Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information | Kristopher Kubicki