Obama Admin. Declares War on SOPA; SOPA Author Caught Stealing Work
January 16, 2012 9:40 AM
comment(s) - last by
Big media continues to push Congress to repay their millions in bribes with punitive legislation
While U.S. President Barack Obama and his advisors
haven't always seen eye to eye with digital freedom advocates
, they have joined forces with the advocacies on one critical issue. They are at last speaking out against the proposed
Orwellian "Stop Online Piracy Act"
) and its Senate counterpart the "PROTECT IP Act" (PIPA) (
I. White House Blasts Big Media's Anti-Internet Bill
The bills have many controversial provisions. Some of the provisions are controversial due to the outrageous approach they take with online businesses. For example, in a provision likened to an internet death penalty by
-- the bills would look to create a takedown system where any site found to be hosting user generated content pointing to infringing content (say a URL to a torrent) could be immediately taken down.
This would be a crippling blow to Amazon.com, Inc. (
), Google Inc. (
), online news, and any other site that allows user-generated content, as a malicious user (e.g. a prankster or competitor) could intentionally plant an offending URL and then contact the regulators to take down the site for weeks at a time. The measure would essentially end all American online commerce, online searching, and online news if enforced.
Other measures of the bill are criticized for their heavy-handed approach. The bill would look to
put members of the American proletariat in prison
for rebroadcasting (the language is ambiguous about the criminality of
) via streaming copyrighted content. An example of this would be if a sporting event was blacked out locally (this often occurs in professional sports like the NFL if tickets go unsold) and a friend from out-of-town broadcasts the game to you by streaming their view of the game (not blacked out, as it's not the local market).
Even though your friend is giving you access to content you have no easy way of legally accessing, your friend who sent you the stream is now going to prison if they get caught. America already imprisons more of its proletariat than any other nation -- including North Korea and Iran -- and spends an estimated $80B USD annually to keep up this record imprisonment. Thus such measures are at least somewhat controversial.
The U.S. already spends $80B USD in federal debt to imprison more of its citizens than any other nation in the world. Now it's looking to add more proles to the galleys.
[Source: David Sanders for
The New York Times
a post on White House blog
White House cyber-security czar Howard Schmidt and two other key officials echoed criticisms of firms like Google and Amazon, in questioning wasn't cyber equivalent of amputating a limb to combat an ingrown nail.
Writes Mr. Schmidt, "Any effort to combat online piracy must guard against the risk of online censorship of lawful activity and must not inhibit innovation by our dynamic businesses large and small."
President Obama's advisors' decisions to publicly speak out against SOPA/PIPA have raised hopes that the President might veto the bill, preventing catastrophic damage to America's high-tech economy. [Image Source: Associated Press]
nearly unanimous opposition from America's top online innovators
-- Google, Amazon, Yahoo! Inc. (YHOO), Facebook, Twitter and eBay Inc. (EBAY) -- Congress people have vowed to ignore their economic leaders and public outcry and forge ahead with the Orwellian measures.
Rep. Lamar Smith (R- Tex.) who co-wrote SOPA,
, "It is not censorship to enforce the law against foreign thieves."
He claims that 19 million jobs and 60 percent of American exports are at stake in the war to protect intellectual property.
II. SOPA Author Caught Infringing, Feels Above the Law he Pushes on the Proles
Rep. Smith's comment seems slightly misleading, given that the bill contains many provisions that are equally punitive to American businesses and individuals as they are to foreign ones. And there's a strong irony in his hardline towards copyright infringement as the office of Rep. Smith was itself recently caught by the blog
Rep. Lamar Smith feels he's above the laws he's looking to subject his lowly proles to.
[Image Source: Lamar Smith]
While Rep. Smith's office has tried to keep this offense quiet, by offering a newer, cleaner version of the Representative's webpage,
was able to locate older version using web tools like the WayBack Engine.
Rep. Smith infringes a hard working artist's work to promote his election campaign.
[Image Source: Lamar Smith]
It was found that the office of Rep. Smith had illegally used a photograph from artist
as a background, without proper citation (and hence without permission).
DJ Schulte is an artist who deserves credit for his work, but the office of SOPA author Rep. Lamar Smith stole the work without attribution. [Image Source: DJ Schulte]
States Mr. Schulte to
I switched my images from traditional copyright protection to be protected under the Creative Commons license a few years ago, which simply states that they can use my images as long as they attribute the image to me and do not use it for commercial purposes."
I do not see anywhere on the screen capture that you have provided that the image was attributed to the source (me). So my conclusion would be that Lamar Smith's organization did improperly use my image. So according to the SOPA bill, should it pass, maybe I could petition the court to take action against www.texansforlamarsmith.com.
(To be clear
can legally repost the image, as we are not reselling it and are properly citing the artist, unlike Rep. Smith.)
The offensive infringement isn't exactly surprising. Recent surveys of active torrents have revealed the offices of members of Congress
downloading infringed content, including pornographic films
Furthermore, SOPA/PIPA's big media backers aren't exactly foreign to the realm of hypocrisy themselves. Major record labels yearly claim access to scores of "unclaimed" independent works in the U.S. and abroad, thanks to favorable laws. Independent artists often find their work stolen by the major labels and are forced to navigate a maze of roadblocks designed to stymie them from recouping the profits the
major labels are stealing through wanton infringement
. It is estimated that such theft on behalf of major media labels accounts for
tens, if not hundreds of millions in lost revenue
annually for independent artists.
III. Big Media Looks to Collect on Their Congressional Bribes
U.S. Recording Industry Association of America
notorious copyright abuser
known for suing dead people and other extreme measures, blasted the White House's opposition to the bills, stating, "[It is illegal for websites] to direct law-abiding consumers to unlawful and dangerous sites. Hyperbole, hysteria and hypotheticals cannot change the fact that stealing is wrong, costing jobs and must be contained."
Motion Picture Association of America
, another famous enforcement firm, states, "Protecting American jobs is important too, particularly in these difficult economic times for our nation."
These statements are parroted near verbatim by the U.S. Senate Chamber of Commerce, who comments, "Given the broad consensus that this issue needs to be addressed, it is time to come together and adopt strong legislation that ends the ability of foreign criminals to prey on innocent consumers and steal American jobs."
This Congressional echo of America's most notorious and abusive media copyright watchdogs is not terribly surprising. After all, media lobbyists paid approximately
10 percent of active U.S. Senators'
, and donated generously to members of the U.S. House of Representatives, as well.
At the 2012 Consumer Electronics Show, Consumer Electronics Association President Gary Shapiro, an active technology advisor to federal policy makers,
attacked these bribes
, stating, "[SOPA is championed by] politicians who are proudly unfamiliar with how the internet works, but who are well familiar with favors from well-heeled copyright extremists."
It remains to be seen, amidst this sweeping bribery of public officials, if the Obama administration would truly be willing to veto a bill like SOPA/PIPA. The administration faces the challenge of trying to push back against an issue that enjoys broad bipartisan support on account of the sweeping bribery. But the administration must weigh the value of its big media benefactors against the value of its legacy -- after all, it could go down in history as the administration that killed the internet economy if PIPA/SOPA passes on its watch.
Most policy makers and critics of SOPA/PIPA agree -- infringement is wrong and needs to be stopped. But as the Obama administration and countless others are stated -- there are less self-destructive, reasonable approaches to fighting piracy. Such positive solutions stands in sharp contrast to the harsh totalitarian policies pushed by big media onto their paid employees, members of Congress.
IV. Who is Fighting For SOPA/PIPA
The U.S. Senators spon
sored the PIPA bill:
The following U.S. Representatives sponsored the SOPA bill:
Lamar Smith (R-TX)
John Conyers (D-MI)
Bob Goodlatte (R-VA)
Howard L. Berman (D-CA)
Tim Griffin (R-AR)
Elton Gallegly (R-CA)
Theodore E. Deutch (D-FL)
Steve Chabot (R-OH)
Dennis Ross (R-FL)
Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
Mary Bono Mack (R-CA)
Lee Terry (R-NE)
Adam B. Schiff (D-CA)
Mel Watt (D-NC)
John Carter (R-TX)
Karen Bass (D-CA)
Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL)
Peter King (R-NY)
Mark E. Amodei (R-NV)
Tom Marino (R-PA)
Alan Nunnelee (R-MS)
John Barrow (D-GA)
Steve Scalise (R-LA)
Ben Ray Luján (D-NM)
William L. Owens (D-NY)
If you have thoughts on this issue, please email your local representatives and let them know how you feel, and consider your incumbent Senator/Representative's actions come election time.
We The People [Obama admin.]
This article is over a month old, voting and posting comments is disabled
RE: It is just common sense to give credit
1/16/2012 9:05:05 PM
Current US law says all new works are copyrighted unless the copyright holder explicitly opts out as was done by the artist whose work was used without attribution.
Simply put, if you cannot prove it is Public Domain or under a license that allows you to use it, it is illegal period.
I am sure that if the websites of public officials were checked, there are many other copyright violations. Especially of material that is protected by default copyright. That is, unregistered and unlicensed, and therefore fully restricted without written permission from the creator.
"Nowadays you can buy a CPU cheaper than the CPU fan." -- Unnamed AMD executive
CES 2012: CEA Prez. Blasts "Copyright Extremists", Stop Online Piracy Act
January 10, 2012, 3:50 PM
Congress Plugs Anti-Piracy Legislation By Day, Pirates Porn by Night
December 29, 2011, 10:41 AM
Guilty Until Proven Innocent: U.S. House Proposes Internet Inquisition, Pt. I
November 16, 2011, 6:50 PM
Obama Admin. Fights to Renew Warrantless Wiretaps, Block Transparency
July 31, 2011, 1:50 PM
Report: Anti-Streaming Lobbyists Paid Off Senators Handsomely
June 18, 2011, 3:50 PM
Amazon's Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 Drops to $299 (30 Percent Off) for a Day
December 22, 2014, 10:57 AM
Mississippi AG Drops Anti-Google Subpoena After Dirty MPAA Ties Are Revealed
December 22, 2014, 9:51 AM
Paramount Bans Team America Screenings, Cowers Submissively to North Korea
December 18, 2014, 10:26 PM
News Corp's Fox is Terrified of North Korea, Kills Upcoming Steve Carell Film
December 18, 2014, 4:09 PM
NPD: Online Shopping is up in 2014, But Brick & Mortar Retail is Booming Too
December 12, 2014, 9:09 AM
Amazon Joins 4K Arms Race, With Free 4K Streaming for Prime Members
December 10, 2014, 10:49 AM
Most Popular Articles
Miyamoto: Nintendo is Prepping Successor to Troubled Wii U
December 22, 2014, 6:28 PM
Amazon's Kindle Fire HDX 8.9 Drops to $299 (30 Percent Off) for a Day
December 22, 2014, 10:57 AM
Airbus A350 XWB Passenger Jet Takes Off, First Unit Delivered to Qatar Airlines
December 22, 2014, 1:22 PM
Microsoft, Google Back The Interview, North Korea Vows Attacks on America
December 24, 2014, 4:25 PM
Nokia's Sweet $250 Android Lollipop N1 Tablet is Rumored for Jan. 7 China Launch
December 24, 2014, 1:45 PM
Latest Blog Posts
Sceptre Airs 27", 120 Hz. 1080p Monitor/HDTV w/ 5 ms Response Time for $220
Dec 3, 2014, 10:32 PM
Costco Gives Employees Thanksgiving Off; Wal-Mart Leads "Black Thursday" Charge
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 PM
"Bear Selfies" Fad Could Turn Deadly, Warn Nevada Wildlife Officials
Oct 28, 2014, 12:00 PM
The Surface Mini That Was Never Released Gets "Hands On" Treatment
Sep 26, 2014, 8:22 AM
ISIS Imposes Ban on Teaching Evolution in Iraq
Sep 17, 2014, 5:22 PM
More Blog Posts
Copyright 2014 DailyTech LLC. -
Terms, Conditions & Privacy Information